Cargando…

Acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies

OBJECTIVE: Overview on risks of acupuncture-related adverse events (AEs). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus and Embase from inception date to 15 September 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Prospective studies assessing AE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bäumler, Petra, Zhang, Wenyue, Stübinger, Theresa, Irnich, Dominik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045961
_version_ 1783749295173795840
author Bäumler, Petra
Zhang, Wenyue
Stübinger, Theresa
Irnich, Dominik
author_facet Bäumler, Petra
Zhang, Wenyue
Stübinger, Theresa
Irnich, Dominik
author_sort Bäumler, Petra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Overview on risks of acupuncture-related adverse events (AEs). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus and Embase from inception date to 15 September 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Prospective studies assessing AEs caused by needle acupuncture in humans as primary outcome published in English or German. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent researchers selected articles, extracted the data and assessed study quality. Overall risks and risks for different AE categories were obtained from random effects meta-analyses. MAIN OUTCOMES: Overall risk of minor AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) per patients and per treatments. RESULTS: A total of 7679 publications were identified. Twenty-two articles reporting on 21 studies were included. Meta-analyses suggest at least one AE occurring in 9.31% (95% CI 5.10% to 14.62%, 11 studies) of patients undergoing an acupuncture series and in 7.57% (95% CI 1.43% to 17.95%, 5 studies) of treatments. Summary risk estimates for SAEs were 1.01 (95% CI 0.23 to 2.33, 11 studies) per 10 000 patients and 7.98 (95% CI 1.39 to 20.00, 14 studies) per one million treatments, for AEs requiring treatment 1.14 (95% CI 0.00 to 7.37, 8 studies) per 1000 patients. Heterogeneity was substantial (I(2) >80%). On average, 9.4 AEs occurred in 100 treatments. Half of the AEs were bleeding, pain or flare at the needle site that are argued to represent intended acupuncture reaction. AE definitions and assessments varied largely. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture can be considered among the safer treatments in medicine. SAEs are rare, and the most common minor AEs are very mild. AEs requiring medical management are uncommon but necessitate medical competence to assure patient safety. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity call for standardised AE assessments tools, clear criteria for differentiating acupuncture-related AEs from therapeutically desired reactions, and identification of patient-related risk factors for AEs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020151930.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8422480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84224802021-09-22 Acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies Bäumler, Petra Zhang, Wenyue Stübinger, Theresa Irnich, Dominik BMJ Open Anaesthesia OBJECTIVE: Overview on risks of acupuncture-related adverse events (AEs). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus and Embase from inception date to 15 September 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Prospective studies assessing AEs caused by needle acupuncture in humans as primary outcome published in English or German. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent researchers selected articles, extracted the data and assessed study quality. Overall risks and risks for different AE categories were obtained from random effects meta-analyses. MAIN OUTCOMES: Overall risk of minor AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) per patients and per treatments. RESULTS: A total of 7679 publications were identified. Twenty-two articles reporting on 21 studies were included. Meta-analyses suggest at least one AE occurring in 9.31% (95% CI 5.10% to 14.62%, 11 studies) of patients undergoing an acupuncture series and in 7.57% (95% CI 1.43% to 17.95%, 5 studies) of treatments. Summary risk estimates for SAEs were 1.01 (95% CI 0.23 to 2.33, 11 studies) per 10 000 patients and 7.98 (95% CI 1.39 to 20.00, 14 studies) per one million treatments, for AEs requiring treatment 1.14 (95% CI 0.00 to 7.37, 8 studies) per 1000 patients. Heterogeneity was substantial (I(2) >80%). On average, 9.4 AEs occurred in 100 treatments. Half of the AEs were bleeding, pain or flare at the needle site that are argued to represent intended acupuncture reaction. AE definitions and assessments varied largely. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture can be considered among the safer treatments in medicine. SAEs are rare, and the most common minor AEs are very mild. AEs requiring medical management are uncommon but necessitate medical competence to assure patient safety. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity call for standardised AE assessments tools, clear criteria for differentiating acupuncture-related AEs from therapeutically desired reactions, and identification of patient-related risk factors for AEs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020151930. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8422480/ /pubmed/34489268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045961 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Bäumler, Petra
Zhang, Wenyue
Stübinger, Theresa
Irnich, Dominik
Acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies
title Acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies
title_full Acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies
title_fullStr Acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies
title_full_unstemmed Acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies
title_short Acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies
title_sort acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045961
work_keys_str_mv AT baumlerpetra acupuncturerelatedadverseeventssystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofprospectiveclinicalstudies
AT zhangwenyue acupuncturerelatedadverseeventssystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofprospectiveclinicalstudies
AT stubingertheresa acupuncturerelatedadverseeventssystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofprospectiveclinicalstudies
AT irnichdominik acupuncturerelatedadverseeventssystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofprospectiveclinicalstudies