Cargando…

Feasibility of portable capnometer for mechanically ventilated preterm infants in the delivery room

This study aimed to determine whether a specific portable capnometer (EMMA™) can facilitate the maintenance of an appropriate partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) in intubated preterm infants in the delivery room. This study included preterm infants with a gestational age of 26 + 0...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hotta, Masashi, Hirata, Katsuya, Nozaki, Masatoshi, Mochizuki, Narutaka, Hirano, Shinya, Wada, Kazuko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34494159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-04246-1
_version_ 1783749447342096384
author Hotta, Masashi
Hirata, Katsuya
Nozaki, Masatoshi
Mochizuki, Narutaka
Hirano, Shinya
Wada, Kazuko
author_facet Hotta, Masashi
Hirata, Katsuya
Nozaki, Masatoshi
Mochizuki, Narutaka
Hirano, Shinya
Wada, Kazuko
author_sort Hotta, Masashi
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to determine whether a specific portable capnometer (EMMA™) can facilitate the maintenance of an appropriate partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) in intubated preterm infants in the delivery room. This study included preterm infants with a gestational age of 26 + 0 to 31 + 6 weeks who required intubation in the delivery room. We prospectively identified 40 infants who underwent the EMMA™ monitoring intervention group and 43 infants who did not undergo monitoring (historical control group). PaCO(2) was evaluated either at admission in the neonatal intensive care unit or at 2 h after birth. The proportion of infants with an appropriate PaCO(2) (35–60 mmHg) was greater in the intervention group than in the control group (80% vs. 42%; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rate of accidental extubation (5.0% vs. 7.0%, p = 1.00) or in the proportion of infants with an appropriate PaCO(2) among infants whose birth weight was < 1000 g (54% vs. 40%, p = 0.49). However, among infants whose birth weight was ≥ 1000 g, the PaCO(2) tended to be more appropriate in the intervention group than in the control group (93% vs. 44%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The EMMA™ facilitated the maintenance of an appropriate PaCO(2) for mechanically ventilated preterm infants, especially infants with birth weight ≥1000 g, in the delivery room. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00431-021-04246-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8423335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84233352021-09-08 Feasibility of portable capnometer for mechanically ventilated preterm infants in the delivery room Hotta, Masashi Hirata, Katsuya Nozaki, Masatoshi Mochizuki, Narutaka Hirano, Shinya Wada, Kazuko Eur J Pediatr Original Article This study aimed to determine whether a specific portable capnometer (EMMA™) can facilitate the maintenance of an appropriate partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) in intubated preterm infants in the delivery room. This study included preterm infants with a gestational age of 26 + 0 to 31 + 6 weeks who required intubation in the delivery room. We prospectively identified 40 infants who underwent the EMMA™ monitoring intervention group and 43 infants who did not undergo monitoring (historical control group). PaCO(2) was evaluated either at admission in the neonatal intensive care unit or at 2 h after birth. The proportion of infants with an appropriate PaCO(2) (35–60 mmHg) was greater in the intervention group than in the control group (80% vs. 42%; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rate of accidental extubation (5.0% vs. 7.0%, p = 1.00) or in the proportion of infants with an appropriate PaCO(2) among infants whose birth weight was < 1000 g (54% vs. 40%, p = 0.49). However, among infants whose birth weight was ≥ 1000 g, the PaCO(2) tended to be more appropriate in the intervention group than in the control group (93% vs. 44%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The EMMA™ facilitated the maintenance of an appropriate PaCO(2) for mechanically ventilated preterm infants, especially infants with birth weight ≥1000 g, in the delivery room. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00431-021-04246-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8423335/ /pubmed/34494159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-04246-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hotta, Masashi
Hirata, Katsuya
Nozaki, Masatoshi
Mochizuki, Narutaka
Hirano, Shinya
Wada, Kazuko
Feasibility of portable capnometer for mechanically ventilated preterm infants in the delivery room
title Feasibility of portable capnometer for mechanically ventilated preterm infants in the delivery room
title_full Feasibility of portable capnometer for mechanically ventilated preterm infants in the delivery room
title_fullStr Feasibility of portable capnometer for mechanically ventilated preterm infants in the delivery room
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of portable capnometer for mechanically ventilated preterm infants in the delivery room
title_short Feasibility of portable capnometer for mechanically ventilated preterm infants in the delivery room
title_sort feasibility of portable capnometer for mechanically ventilated preterm infants in the delivery room
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34494159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-04246-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hottamasashi feasibilityofportablecapnometerformechanicallyventilatedpreterminfantsinthedeliveryroom
AT hiratakatsuya feasibilityofportablecapnometerformechanicallyventilatedpreterminfantsinthedeliveryroom
AT nozakimasatoshi feasibilityofportablecapnometerformechanicallyventilatedpreterminfantsinthedeliveryroom
AT mochizukinarutaka feasibilityofportablecapnometerformechanicallyventilatedpreterminfantsinthedeliveryroom
AT hiranoshinya feasibilityofportablecapnometerformechanicallyventilatedpreterminfantsinthedeliveryroom
AT wadakazuko feasibilityofportablecapnometerformechanicallyventilatedpreterminfantsinthedeliveryroom