Cargando…

A Roadmap for Successful State Sepsis Regulations—Lessons From New York

New York state implemented the first state-level sepsis regulations in 2013. These regulations were associated with improved mortality, leading other states to consider similar steps. Our objective was to provide insight into New York state’s sepsis policy making process, creating a roadmap for poli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gigli, Kristin Hittle, Rak, Kimberly J., Hershey, Tina Batra, Martsolf, Grant R., Kahn, Jeremy M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000521
_version_ 1783749457175642112
author Gigli, Kristin Hittle
Rak, Kimberly J.
Hershey, Tina Batra
Martsolf, Grant R.
Kahn, Jeremy M.
author_facet Gigli, Kristin Hittle
Rak, Kimberly J.
Hershey, Tina Batra
Martsolf, Grant R.
Kahn, Jeremy M.
author_sort Gigli, Kristin Hittle
collection PubMed
description New York state implemented the first state-level sepsis regulations in 2013. These regulations were associated with improved mortality, leading other states to consider similar steps. Our objective was to provide insight into New York state’s sepsis policy making process, creating a roadmap for policymakers in other states considering similar regulations. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. SETTING: We recruited key stakeholders who had knowledge of the New York state sepsis regulations. SUBJECTS: Thirteen key stakeholders from three groups included four New York state policymakers and seven clinicians and hospital association leaders involved in the creation and implementation of the 2013 New York state sepsis regulations, as well as two members of patient advocacy groups engaged in sepsis advocacy. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used iterative, inductive thematic analysis to identify themes related to participant perceptions of the New York state sepsis policy, factors that influenced the policy’s perceived successes, and opportunities for improvement. We identified several factors that facilitated success. Among these were that policymakers engaged a diverse array of stakeholders in development, allowing them to address potential barriers to implementation and create early buy-in. Policymakers also paid specific attention to the balance between the desire for comprehensive reporting and the burden of data collection, narrowly focusing on “essential” sepsis-related data elements to reduce the burden on hospitals. In addition, the regulations touched on all three major domains of sepsis quality—structure, process, and outcomes—going beyond a data collection to give hospitals tools to improve sepsis care. CONCLUSIONS: We identified factors that distinguish the New York sepsis regulations from less successful sepsis polices at the federal level. Ultimately, lessons from New York state provide valuable guidance to policymakers and hospital officials seeking to develop and implement policies that will improve sepsis quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8423398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84233982021-09-09 A Roadmap for Successful State Sepsis Regulations—Lessons From New York Gigli, Kristin Hittle Rak, Kimberly J. Hershey, Tina Batra Martsolf, Grant R. Kahn, Jeremy M. Crit Care Explor Original Clinical Report New York state implemented the first state-level sepsis regulations in 2013. These regulations were associated with improved mortality, leading other states to consider similar steps. Our objective was to provide insight into New York state’s sepsis policy making process, creating a roadmap for policymakers in other states considering similar regulations. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. SETTING: We recruited key stakeholders who had knowledge of the New York state sepsis regulations. SUBJECTS: Thirteen key stakeholders from three groups included four New York state policymakers and seven clinicians and hospital association leaders involved in the creation and implementation of the 2013 New York state sepsis regulations, as well as two members of patient advocacy groups engaged in sepsis advocacy. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used iterative, inductive thematic analysis to identify themes related to participant perceptions of the New York state sepsis policy, factors that influenced the policy’s perceived successes, and opportunities for improvement. We identified several factors that facilitated success. Among these were that policymakers engaged a diverse array of stakeholders in development, allowing them to address potential barriers to implementation and create early buy-in. Policymakers also paid specific attention to the balance between the desire for comprehensive reporting and the burden of data collection, narrowly focusing on “essential” sepsis-related data elements to reduce the burden on hospitals. In addition, the regulations touched on all three major domains of sepsis quality—structure, process, and outcomes—going beyond a data collection to give hospitals tools to improve sepsis care. CONCLUSIONS: We identified factors that distinguish the New York sepsis regulations from less successful sepsis polices at the federal level. Ultimately, lessons from New York state provide valuable guidance to policymakers and hospital officials seeking to develop and implement policies that will improve sepsis quality. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8423398/ /pubmed/34514423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000521 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Report
Gigli, Kristin Hittle
Rak, Kimberly J.
Hershey, Tina Batra
Martsolf, Grant R.
Kahn, Jeremy M.
A Roadmap for Successful State Sepsis Regulations—Lessons From New York
title A Roadmap for Successful State Sepsis Regulations—Lessons From New York
title_full A Roadmap for Successful State Sepsis Regulations—Lessons From New York
title_fullStr A Roadmap for Successful State Sepsis Regulations—Lessons From New York
title_full_unstemmed A Roadmap for Successful State Sepsis Regulations—Lessons From New York
title_short A Roadmap for Successful State Sepsis Regulations—Lessons From New York
title_sort roadmap for successful state sepsis regulations—lessons from new york
topic Original Clinical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000521
work_keys_str_mv AT giglikristinhittle aroadmapforsuccessfulstatesepsisregulationslessonsfromnewyork
AT rakkimberlyj aroadmapforsuccessfulstatesepsisregulationslessonsfromnewyork
AT hersheytinabatra aroadmapforsuccessfulstatesepsisregulationslessonsfromnewyork
AT martsolfgrantr aroadmapforsuccessfulstatesepsisregulationslessonsfromnewyork
AT kahnjeremym aroadmapforsuccessfulstatesepsisregulationslessonsfromnewyork
AT giglikristinhittle roadmapforsuccessfulstatesepsisregulationslessonsfromnewyork
AT rakkimberlyj roadmapforsuccessfulstatesepsisregulationslessonsfromnewyork
AT hersheytinabatra roadmapforsuccessfulstatesepsisregulationslessonsfromnewyork
AT martsolfgrantr roadmapforsuccessfulstatesepsisregulationslessonsfromnewyork
AT kahnjeremym roadmapforsuccessfulstatesepsisregulationslessonsfromnewyork