Cargando…
Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg(−1) over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial
PURPOSE: A number of studies performed in the operating room evaluated the hemodynamic effects of the fluid challenge (FC), solely considering the effect before and after the infusion. Few studies have investigated the pharmacodynamic effect of the FC on hemodynamic flow and pressure variables. We d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34494204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00756-3 |
_version_ | 1783749498905821184 |
---|---|
author | Messina, Antonio Palandri, Chiara De Rosa, Silvia Danzi, Vinicio Bonaldi, Efrem Montagnini, Claudia Baino, Sara Villa, Federico Sala, Francesca Zito, Paola Negri, Katerina Della Corte, Francesco Cammarota, Gianmaria Saderi, Laura Sotgiu, Giovanni Monge García, Manuel Ignacio Cecconi, Maurizio |
author_facet | Messina, Antonio Palandri, Chiara De Rosa, Silvia Danzi, Vinicio Bonaldi, Efrem Montagnini, Claudia Baino, Sara Villa, Federico Sala, Francesca Zito, Paola Negri, Katerina Della Corte, Francesco Cammarota, Gianmaria Saderi, Laura Sotgiu, Giovanni Monge García, Manuel Ignacio Cecconi, Maurizio |
author_sort | Messina, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: A number of studies performed in the operating room evaluated the hemodynamic effects of the fluid challenge (FC), solely considering the effect before and after the infusion. Few studies have investigated the pharmacodynamic effect of the FC on hemodynamic flow and pressure variables. We designed this trial aiming at describing the pharmacodynamic profile of two different FC infusion times, of a fixed dose of 4 ml kg(−1). METHODS: Forty-nine elective neurosurgical patients received two consecutive FCs of 4 ml kg(−1) of crystalloids in 10 (FC(10)) or 20 (FC(20)) minutes, in a random order. Fluid responsiveness was defined as stroke volume index increase ≥ 10%. We assessed the net area under the curve (AUC), the maximal percentage difference from baseline (d(max)), time when the d(max) was observed (t(max)), change from baseline at 1-min (d(1)) and 5-min (d(5)) after FC end. RESULTS: After FC(10) and FC(20,) 25 (51%) and 14 (29%) of 49 patients were classified as fluid responders (p = 0.001). With the exception of the AUCs of SAP and MAP, the AUCs of all the considered hemodynamic variables were comparable. The d(max) and the t(max) were overall comparable. In both groups, the hemodynamic effects on flow variables were dissipated within 5 min after FC end. CONCLUSIONS: The infusion time of FC administration affects fluid responsiveness, being higher for FC(10) as compared to FC(20). The effect on flow variables of either FCs fades 5 min after the end of infusion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10877-021-00756-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8423602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84236022021-09-08 Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg(−1) over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial Messina, Antonio Palandri, Chiara De Rosa, Silvia Danzi, Vinicio Bonaldi, Efrem Montagnini, Claudia Baino, Sara Villa, Federico Sala, Francesca Zito, Paola Negri, Katerina Della Corte, Francesco Cammarota, Gianmaria Saderi, Laura Sotgiu, Giovanni Monge García, Manuel Ignacio Cecconi, Maurizio J Clin Monit Comput Original Research PURPOSE: A number of studies performed in the operating room evaluated the hemodynamic effects of the fluid challenge (FC), solely considering the effect before and after the infusion. Few studies have investigated the pharmacodynamic effect of the FC on hemodynamic flow and pressure variables. We designed this trial aiming at describing the pharmacodynamic profile of two different FC infusion times, of a fixed dose of 4 ml kg(−1). METHODS: Forty-nine elective neurosurgical patients received two consecutive FCs of 4 ml kg(−1) of crystalloids in 10 (FC(10)) or 20 (FC(20)) minutes, in a random order. Fluid responsiveness was defined as stroke volume index increase ≥ 10%. We assessed the net area under the curve (AUC), the maximal percentage difference from baseline (d(max)), time when the d(max) was observed (t(max)), change from baseline at 1-min (d(1)) and 5-min (d(5)) after FC end. RESULTS: After FC(10) and FC(20,) 25 (51%) and 14 (29%) of 49 patients were classified as fluid responders (p = 0.001). With the exception of the AUCs of SAP and MAP, the AUCs of all the considered hemodynamic variables were comparable. The d(max) and the t(max) were overall comparable. In both groups, the hemodynamic effects on flow variables were dissipated within 5 min after FC end. CONCLUSIONS: The infusion time of FC administration affects fluid responsiveness, being higher for FC(10) as compared to FC(20). The effect on flow variables of either FCs fades 5 min after the end of infusion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10877-021-00756-3. Springer Netherlands 2021-09-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8423602/ /pubmed/34494204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00756-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Messina, Antonio Palandri, Chiara De Rosa, Silvia Danzi, Vinicio Bonaldi, Efrem Montagnini, Claudia Baino, Sara Villa, Federico Sala, Francesca Zito, Paola Negri, Katerina Della Corte, Francesco Cammarota, Gianmaria Saderi, Laura Sotgiu, Giovanni Monge García, Manuel Ignacio Cecconi, Maurizio Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg(−1) over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial |
title | Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg(−1) over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg(−1) over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg(−1) over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg(−1) over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg(−1) over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg(−1) over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34494204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00756-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT messinaantonio pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT palandrichiara pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT derosasilvia pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT danzivinicio pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT bonaldiefrem pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT montagniniclaudia pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT bainosara pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT villafederico pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT salafrancesca pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT zitopaola pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT negrikaterina pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT dellacortefrancesco pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT cammarotagianmaria pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT saderilaura pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT sotgiugiovanni pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT mongegarciamanuelignacio pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial AT cecconimaurizio pharmacodynamicanalysisofafluidchallengewith4mlkg1over10or20minamulticentercrossoverrandomizedclinicaltrial |