Cargando…
Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study
The rapid rise of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has necessitated an efficient and standardized training curriculum. Cognitive training (CT) can significantly improve skills, such as attention, working memory and problem solving, and can enhance surgical capacity and support RAS training. This pilot...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33185847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01167-3 |
_version_ | 1783749518936768512 |
---|---|
author | Schönburg, Sandra Anheuser, Petra Kranz, Jennifer Fornara, Paolo Oubaid, Viktor |
author_facet | Schönburg, Sandra Anheuser, Petra Kranz, Jennifer Fornara, Paolo Oubaid, Viktor |
author_sort | Schönburg, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rapid rise of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has necessitated an efficient and standardized training curriculum. Cognitive training (CT) can significantly improve skills, such as attention, working memory and problem solving, and can enhance surgical capacity and support RAS training. This pilot study was carried out between 02/2019 and 04/2019. The participants included 33 student volunteers, randomized into 3 groups: group 1 received training using the da Vinci training simulator, group 2 received computer-based cognitive training, and group 3 was the control group without training. Before (T1) and after-training (T2), performance was measured. Additionally, expert ratings and self-evaluations were collected. Subjective evaluations of performance were supplemented by evaluations based on three scales from the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). In total, 25 probands remained with complete data for further analyses: n = 8 (group 1), n = 7 (group 2) and n = 10 (group 3). There were no significant differences in T1 and T2 among all three groups. The average training gain of group 1 and 2 was 15.87% and 24.6%, respectively, (a restricting condition is the loss of the last training session in group 2). Analyses of semi-structured psychological interviews (SPIs) revealed no significant differences for T1, but in T2, significance occurred at ‘self-reflection’ for group 2 (F(2.22) = 8.56; p < .005). The efficacy of CT in training highly complex and difficult procedures, such as RAS, is a proven and accepted fact. Further investigation involving higher numbers of training trials (while also being cost effective) should be performed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8423692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84236922021-09-09 Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study Schönburg, Sandra Anheuser, Petra Kranz, Jennifer Fornara, Paolo Oubaid, Viktor J Robot Surg Original Article The rapid rise of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has necessitated an efficient and standardized training curriculum. Cognitive training (CT) can significantly improve skills, such as attention, working memory and problem solving, and can enhance surgical capacity and support RAS training. This pilot study was carried out between 02/2019 and 04/2019. The participants included 33 student volunteers, randomized into 3 groups: group 1 received training using the da Vinci training simulator, group 2 received computer-based cognitive training, and group 3 was the control group without training. Before (T1) and after-training (T2), performance was measured. Additionally, expert ratings and self-evaluations were collected. Subjective evaluations of performance were supplemented by evaluations based on three scales from the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). In total, 25 probands remained with complete data for further analyses: n = 8 (group 1), n = 7 (group 2) and n = 10 (group 3). There were no significant differences in T1 and T2 among all three groups. The average training gain of group 1 and 2 was 15.87% and 24.6%, respectively, (a restricting condition is the loss of the last training session in group 2). Analyses of semi-structured psychological interviews (SPIs) revealed no significant differences for T1, but in T2, significance occurred at ‘self-reflection’ for group 2 (F(2.22) = 8.56; p < .005). The efficacy of CT in training highly complex and difficult procedures, such as RAS, is a proven and accepted fact. Further investigation involving higher numbers of training trials (while also being cost effective) should be performed. Springer London 2020-11-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8423692/ /pubmed/33185847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01167-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Schönburg, Sandra Anheuser, Petra Kranz, Jennifer Fornara, Paolo Oubaid, Viktor Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study |
title | Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study |
title_full | Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study |
title_short | Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study |
title_sort | cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33185847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01167-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schonburgsandra cognitivetrainingforroboticsurgeryachancetooptimizesurgicaltrainingapilotstudy AT anheuserpetra cognitivetrainingforroboticsurgeryachancetooptimizesurgicaltrainingapilotstudy AT kranzjennifer cognitivetrainingforroboticsurgeryachancetooptimizesurgicaltrainingapilotstudy AT fornarapaolo cognitivetrainingforroboticsurgeryachancetooptimizesurgicaltrainingapilotstudy AT oubaidviktor cognitivetrainingforroboticsurgeryachancetooptimizesurgicaltrainingapilotstudy |