Cargando…

Conventional oxygen therapy versus CPAP as a ceiling of care in ward-based patients with COVID-19: a multi-centre cohort evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is commonly used for respiratory failure due to severe COVID-19 pneumonitis, including in patients deemed not likely to benefit from invasive mechanical ventilation (nIMV). Little evidence exists demonstrating superiority over convention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradley, P, Wilson, J, Taylor, R, Nixon, J, Redfern, J, Whittemore, P, Gaddah, M, Kavuri, K, Haley, A, Denny, P, Withers, C, Robey, RC, Logue, C, Dahanayake, N, Min, D Siaw Hui, Coles, J, Deshmukh, M S, Ritchie, S, Malik, M, Abdelaal, H, Sivabalah, K, Hartshorne, MD, Gopikrishna, D, Ashish, A, Nuttall, E, Bentley, A, Bongers, T, Gatheral, T, Felton, TW, Chaudhuri, N, Pearmain, L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101122
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is commonly used for respiratory failure due to severe COVID-19 pneumonitis, including in patients deemed not likely to benefit from invasive mechanical ventilation (nIMV). Little evidence exists demonstrating superiority over conventional oxygen therapy, whilst ward-level delivery of CPAP presents practical challenges. We sought to compare clinical outcomes of oxygen therapy versus CPAP therapy in patients with COVID-19 who were nIMV. METHODS: This retrospective multi-centre cohort evaluation included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who were nIMV, had a treatment escalation plan of ward-level care and clinical frailty scale ≤ 6. Recruitment occurred during the first two waves of the UK COVID-19 pandemic in 2020; from 1(st) March to May 31(st), and from 1(st) September to 31(st) December. Patients given CPAP were compared to patients receiving oxygen therapy that required FiO(2) ≥0(.)4 for more than 12 hours at hospitals not providing ward-level CPAP. Logistic regression modelling was performed to compare 30-day mortality between treatment groups, accounting for important confounders and within-hospital clustering. FINDINGS: Seven hospitals provided data for 479 patients during the UK COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Overall 30-day mortality was 75.6% in the oxygen group (186/246 patients) and 77.7% in the CPAP group (181/233 patients). A lack of evidence for a treatment effect persisted in the adjusted model (adjusted odds ratio 0.84 95% CI 0.57-1.23, p=0.37). 49.8% of patients receiving CPAP-therapy (118/237) chose to discontinue it. INTERPRETATION: No survival difference was found between using oxygen alone or CPAP to treat patients with severe COVID-19 who were nIMV. A high patient-initiated discontinuation rate for CPAP suggests a significant treatment burden. Further reflection is warranted on the current treatment guidance and widespread application of CPAP in this setting. FUNDING: L Pearmain is supported by the MRC (MR/R00191X/1). TW Felton is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.