Cargando…
Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action
BACKGROUND: In several recent articles, authors have called for aligning the fields of implementation and improvement science. In this paper, we call for implementation science to also align with improvement practice. Multiple implementation scholars have highlighted the importance of designing impl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34496978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00201-1 |
_version_ | 1783749618499059712 |
---|---|
author | Leeman, Jennifer Rohweder, Catherine Lee, Matthew Brenner, Alison Dwyer, Andrea Ko, Linda K. O’Leary, Meghan C. Ryan, Grace Vu, Thuy Ramanadhan, Shoba |
author_facet | Leeman, Jennifer Rohweder, Catherine Lee, Matthew Brenner, Alison Dwyer, Andrea Ko, Linda K. O’Leary, Meghan C. Ryan, Grace Vu, Thuy Ramanadhan, Shoba |
author_sort | Leeman, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In several recent articles, authors have called for aligning the fields of implementation and improvement science. In this paper, we call for implementation science to also align with improvement practice. Multiple implementation scholars have highlighted the importance of designing implementation strategies to fit the existing culture, infrastructure, and practice of a healthcare system. Worldwide, healthcare systems are adopting improvement models as their primary approach to improving healthcare delivery and outcomes. The prevalence of improvement models raises the question of how implementation scientists might best align their efforts with healthcare systems’ existing improvement infrastructure and practice. MAIN BODY: We describe three challenges and five benefits to aligning implementation science and improvement practice. Challenges include (1) use of different models, terminology, and methods, (2) a focus on generalizable versus local knowledge, and (3) limited evidence in support of the effectiveness of improvement tools and methods. We contend that implementation science needs to move beyond these challenges and work toward greater alignment with improvement practice. Aligning with improvement practice would benefit implementation science by (1) strengthening research/practice partnerships, (2) fostering local ownership of implementation, (3) generating practice-based evidence, (4) developing context-specific implementation strategies, and (5) building practice-level capacity to implement interventions and improve care. Each of these potential benefits is illustrated in a case study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network. CONCLUSION: To effectively integrate evidence-based interventions into routine practice, implementation scientists need to align their efforts with the improvement culture and practice that is driving change within healthcare systems worldwide. This paper provides concrete examples of how researchers have aligned implementation science with improvement practice across five implementation projects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00201-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8424169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84241692021-09-08 Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action Leeman, Jennifer Rohweder, Catherine Lee, Matthew Brenner, Alison Dwyer, Andrea Ko, Linda K. O’Leary, Meghan C. Ryan, Grace Vu, Thuy Ramanadhan, Shoba Implement Sci Commun Debate BACKGROUND: In several recent articles, authors have called for aligning the fields of implementation and improvement science. In this paper, we call for implementation science to also align with improvement practice. Multiple implementation scholars have highlighted the importance of designing implementation strategies to fit the existing culture, infrastructure, and practice of a healthcare system. Worldwide, healthcare systems are adopting improvement models as their primary approach to improving healthcare delivery and outcomes. The prevalence of improvement models raises the question of how implementation scientists might best align their efforts with healthcare systems’ existing improvement infrastructure and practice. MAIN BODY: We describe three challenges and five benefits to aligning implementation science and improvement practice. Challenges include (1) use of different models, terminology, and methods, (2) a focus on generalizable versus local knowledge, and (3) limited evidence in support of the effectiveness of improvement tools and methods. We contend that implementation science needs to move beyond these challenges and work toward greater alignment with improvement practice. Aligning with improvement practice would benefit implementation science by (1) strengthening research/practice partnerships, (2) fostering local ownership of implementation, (3) generating practice-based evidence, (4) developing context-specific implementation strategies, and (5) building practice-level capacity to implement interventions and improve care. Each of these potential benefits is illustrated in a case study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network. CONCLUSION: To effectively integrate evidence-based interventions into routine practice, implementation scientists need to align their efforts with the improvement culture and practice that is driving change within healthcare systems worldwide. This paper provides concrete examples of how researchers have aligned implementation science with improvement practice across five implementation projects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00201-1. BioMed Central 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8424169/ /pubmed/34496978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00201-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Debate Leeman, Jennifer Rohweder, Catherine Lee, Matthew Brenner, Alison Dwyer, Andrea Ko, Linda K. O’Leary, Meghan C. Ryan, Grace Vu, Thuy Ramanadhan, Shoba Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action |
title | Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action |
title_full | Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action |
title_fullStr | Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action |
title_full_unstemmed | Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action |
title_short | Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action |
title_sort | aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34496978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00201-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leemanjennifer aligningimplementationsciencewithimprovementpracticeacalltoaction AT rohwedercatherine aligningimplementationsciencewithimprovementpracticeacalltoaction AT leematthew aligningimplementationsciencewithimprovementpracticeacalltoaction AT brenneralison aligningimplementationsciencewithimprovementpracticeacalltoaction AT dwyerandrea aligningimplementationsciencewithimprovementpracticeacalltoaction AT kolindak aligningimplementationsciencewithimprovementpracticeacalltoaction AT olearymeghanc aligningimplementationsciencewithimprovementpracticeacalltoaction AT ryangrace aligningimplementationsciencewithimprovementpracticeacalltoaction AT vuthuy aligningimplementationsciencewithimprovementpracticeacalltoaction AT ramanadhanshoba aligningimplementationsciencewithimprovementpracticeacalltoaction |