Cargando…
Comparison of Rat Connective Tissue Response to BioMTA, Angelus MTA, and Root MTA
Due to the widespread use of MTA in dentistry and various brands of this product, we decided to compare the three brands available in the country market by their biocompatibility. We divided 20 male Wistar rats into four groups. After local anesthesia and washing, we made two incisions on both sides...
Autores principales: | Alimohammadi, Marzieh, Mirzaee-Rad, Sina, Feizi, Farideh, Shirzad Juybari, Hadi, Saeidi, Akam, Gholinia, Hemmat |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7415302 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Deconvolution of the particle size distribution of ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus
por: Ha, William Nguyen, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
X-ray diffraction analysis of MTA-Plus, MTA-Angelus and DiaRoot BioAggregate
por: Guven, Yeliz, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of Bio-C Repair, Endosequence BC Root Repair, MTA Angelus and MTA Repair HP
por: Abrão, Suene Moçato Siguematsu, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Effect of Fluorohydroxyapatite on Biological and Physical Properties of MTA Angelus
por: Bolhari, Behnam, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Histopathological Biocompatibility Evaluation of TheraCal PT, NeoMTA, and MTA Angelus in a Murine Model
por: Quiñonez-Ruvalcaba, Francelia, et al.
Publicado: (2023)