A study of unprotected left main intervention in the ACS population 2013–2018

OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to evaluate the outcomes of left main percutaneous coronary interventions in Acute Coronary Syndrome population. METHODS: This is a retrospective& observational study. Primary endpoint is a composite of death, stent thrombosis/MI, target lesion revascularization....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarma, Venkata R.S. Subrahmanya, Gopalakrishna, K., Purnachandra rao, K., Somasekahr, G., Chowdary, P.S.S., Raghuram, P., Boochibabu, M., Sasidhar, Y., Prasad, M., Karthik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Research Brief
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34474764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2021.06.010
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to evaluate the outcomes of left main percutaneous coronary interventions in Acute Coronary Syndrome population. METHODS: This is a retrospective& observational study. Primary endpoint is a composite of death, stent thrombosis/MI, target lesion revascularization. Secondary endpoints include individual components of the primary events analyzed separately. RESULTS: Seventy five patients, two year follow – up data was analyzed. The primary event analysis showed that the Elective Double Stent (EDS) group had a higher primary events (36% vs. 14%, p value – 0.008, Hazard ratio – 0.76 (0.51–1.15, 95% CI), in secondary event analysis stent thrombosis (ST)/Myocardial infarction (MI) rates were higher in EDS group (8% Vs 36%, p Value – 0.008, Hazard ratio- 0.63(0.35–1.14, 95%CI), there is no difference in target lesion revascularization (TLR)and death rates in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The provisional strategy is better than EDS in treatment of left main bifurcation lesions in the ACS population.

Ejemplares similares