Cargando…

Comment: Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Deora, Surender, Choudhary, Rahul, Kaushik, Atul
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Elsevier 2021
Materias:	Letter to the Editor
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34474774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2021.06.015

Ejemplares similares

Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Rana, Naresh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Anatomical snuff box approach for percutaneous coronary interventions – Current status
por: Deora, Surender, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization
por: Deora, Surender, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Origin of all Three Coronaries from Single Ostium: A Rare Case Report
por: Deora, Surender, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Association Between Radial Versus Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Long‐Term Mortality
por: Ng, Andrew Kei‐Yan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Single Coronary Artery with Superdominant Left Circumflex Artery: A Rare Coronary Anomaly
por: Choudhary, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Design and Rationale of the Femoral Closure versus Radial Compression Devices Related to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (FERARI) Study
por: Behnes, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Radial or femoral access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): Does the choice matters?
por: Batra, Mahesh Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Analysis of safety outcomes for radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention from a large clinical registry
por: Dobies, David R, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Acute kidney injury in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using radial versus femoral access
por: Kanic, Vojko, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Chest pain and exercise induced left bundle branch block – A clinical dilemma
por: Deora, Surender, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Differences of bleedings after percutaneous coronary intervention using femoral closure and radial compression devices
por: Kim, Seung-Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Noninvasive assessment of pulmonary congestion in heart failure: Need of the hour
por: Deora, Surender, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Saphenous Vein Graft Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - A Nightmare to be Avoided
por: Deora, Surender, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Impact of Covid-19 outbreak on clinical presentation of patients admitted for acute heart failure in India
por: Choudhary, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Patient preference for radial versus femoral vascular access for elective coronary procedures: The PREVAS study
por: Kok, Marlies M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparison between radial versus femoral percutaneous coronary intervention access in Indonesian hospitals, 2017–2018: A prospective observational study of a national registry
por: Alkatiri, Amir Aziz, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Acceptance and safety of femoral versus radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): results from a large monitor-controlled German registry (QuIK)
por: Reifart, Jörg, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Incidence of Radial Artery Occlusion in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Trans Radial Access
por: Bukhari, Syed Naseem, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Radial Approach Expertise and Clinical Outcomes of Percutanous Coronary Interventions Performed Using Femoral Approach
por: Tokarek, Tomasz, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Vascular Access for Percutaneous Coronary and Structural Interventions
por: Xenogiannis, Iosif, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Single Coronary Artery from Right Sinus: Radial Route is Right
por: Mahla, Rakesh, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Femoral versus Radial Access in Primary Angioplasty. Analysis of the ACCEPT Registry
por: de Andrade, Pedro Beraldo, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Left Distal Radial Artery Access Site in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is It Safe?
por: Soydan, Elton, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures
por: Basu, Dev, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Hemostatic agents for access tract in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Is it worth?
por: Sepulveda, Francisco, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A comparative assessment of Dorsal radial artery access versus classical radial artery access for percutaneous coronary angiography-a randomized control trial (DORA trial)
por: Sharma, Awadhesh Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Predictive Factors for Access-Site Pain Chronicity after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Radial Artery Access
por: Brogiene, Liuda, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of Radial Artery Occlusion Following Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Sheath-based versus Sheathless Technique
por: Mohsen, Ala, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through the Left Radial Artery is Associated with Less Vascular Complications than Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through the Femoral Artery
por: Qi, Guoqing, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Feasibility of the Radial Artery as a Vascular Access Route in Performing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Kim, Jang-Young, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Lessons from transulnar access for repeat percutaneous coronary intervention after radial artery occlusion
por: Bi, Xi-Le, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Distal Radial Artery Access for Superficial Femoral Artery Interventions
por: Ruzsa, Zoltán, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Radial access for percutaneous coronary procedure: relationship between operator expertise and complications
por: Susanu, Simona, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reply to letter to Editor written by Deora S, et al, regarding publication entitled “Rana N, Vijayvergiya R, Kasinadhuni G, et al. Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention. Indian Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2021.04.006”
por: Vijayvergiya, Rajesh
Publicado: (2021)

Trans-radial approach versus trans-femoral approach in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Senguttuvan, Nagendra Boopathy, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Safety of RADial comPRESSion Devices: A Multi-Center Trial of Patent Hemostasis following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from Conventional Radial Access (RAD-PRESS Trial)
por: Nemeth, Balazs T., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Transradial versus transfemoral approach in STEMI: Choice is with the operator
por: Deora, Surender
Publicado: (2020)

Comment on: Anesthesiologists and Job Satisfaction in Cardiac Cath lab: Do we need Guidelines?
por: Deora, Surender, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Outcomes of a Modified Technique for Deflation of Distal Radial Artery Occlusion Device on Radial Artery Patency After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Habib, Aatika, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_p7pptsehse5atera029raidajj