Cargando…

Visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning

INTRODUCTION: The prostatic urethra is an organ at risk for prostate radiotherapy with genitourinary toxicities a common side effect. Many external beam radiation therapy protocols call for urethral sparing, and with modulated radiotherapy techniques, the radiation dose distribution can be controlle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richardson, Matthew, Skehan, Kate, Wilton, Lee, Sams, Joshua, Samuels, Justin, Goodwin, Jonathan, Greer, Peter, Sridharan, Swetha, Martin, Jarad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.485
_version_ 1783749650609602560
author Richardson, Matthew
Skehan, Kate
Wilton, Lee
Sams, Joshua
Samuels, Justin
Goodwin, Jonathan
Greer, Peter
Sridharan, Swetha
Martin, Jarad
author_facet Richardson, Matthew
Skehan, Kate
Wilton, Lee
Sams, Joshua
Samuels, Justin
Goodwin, Jonathan
Greer, Peter
Sridharan, Swetha
Martin, Jarad
author_sort Richardson, Matthew
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The prostatic urethra is an organ at risk for prostate radiotherapy with genitourinary toxicities a common side effect. Many external beam radiation therapy protocols call for urethral sparing, and with modulated radiotherapy techniques, the radiation dose distribution can be controlled so that maximum doses do not fall within the prostatic urethral volume. Whilst traditional diagnostic MRI sequences provide excellent delineation of the prostate, uncertainty often remains as to the true path of the urethra within the gland. This study aims to assess if a high‐resolution isotropic 3D T2 MRI series can reduce inter‐observer variability in urethral delineation for radiotherapy planning. METHODS: Five independent observers contoured the prostatic urethra for ten patients on three data sets; a 2 mm axial CT, a diagnostic 3 mm axial T2 TSE MRI and a 0.9 mm isotropic 3D T2 SPACE MRI. The observers were blinded from each other’s contours. A Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) score was calculated using the intersection and union of the five observer contours vs an expert reference contour for each data set. RESULTS: The mean DSC of the observer vs reference contours was 0.47 for CT, 0.62 for T2 TSE and 0.78 for T2 SPACE (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a 0.9 mm isotropic 3D T2 SPACE MRI for treatment planning provides improved urethral visualisation and can lead to a significant reduction in inter‐observer variation in prostatic urethral contouring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8424315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84243152021-09-13 Visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning Richardson, Matthew Skehan, Kate Wilton, Lee Sams, Joshua Samuels, Justin Goodwin, Jonathan Greer, Peter Sridharan, Swetha Martin, Jarad J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: The prostatic urethra is an organ at risk for prostate radiotherapy with genitourinary toxicities a common side effect. Many external beam radiation therapy protocols call for urethral sparing, and with modulated radiotherapy techniques, the radiation dose distribution can be controlled so that maximum doses do not fall within the prostatic urethral volume. Whilst traditional diagnostic MRI sequences provide excellent delineation of the prostate, uncertainty often remains as to the true path of the urethra within the gland. This study aims to assess if a high‐resolution isotropic 3D T2 MRI series can reduce inter‐observer variability in urethral delineation for radiotherapy planning. METHODS: Five independent observers contoured the prostatic urethra for ten patients on three data sets; a 2 mm axial CT, a diagnostic 3 mm axial T2 TSE MRI and a 0.9 mm isotropic 3D T2 SPACE MRI. The observers were blinded from each other’s contours. A Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) score was calculated using the intersection and union of the five observer contours vs an expert reference contour for each data set. RESULTS: The mean DSC of the observer vs reference contours was 0.47 for CT, 0.62 for T2 TSE and 0.78 for T2 SPACE (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a 0.9 mm isotropic 3D T2 SPACE MRI for treatment planning provides improved urethral visualisation and can lead to a significant reduction in inter‐observer variation in prostatic urethral contouring. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-24 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8424315/ /pubmed/34028976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.485 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Richardson, Matthew
Skehan, Kate
Wilton, Lee
Sams, Joshua
Samuels, Justin
Goodwin, Jonathan
Greer, Peter
Sridharan, Swetha
Martin, Jarad
Visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning
title Visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning
title_full Visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning
title_fullStr Visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning
title_full_unstemmed Visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning
title_short Visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning
title_sort visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.485
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsonmatthew visualisingtheurethraforprostateradiotherapyplanning
AT skehankate visualisingtheurethraforprostateradiotherapyplanning
AT wiltonlee visualisingtheurethraforprostateradiotherapyplanning
AT samsjoshua visualisingtheurethraforprostateradiotherapyplanning
AT samuelsjustin visualisingtheurethraforprostateradiotherapyplanning
AT goodwinjonathan visualisingtheurethraforprostateradiotherapyplanning
AT greerpeter visualisingtheurethraforprostateradiotherapyplanning
AT sridharanswetha visualisingtheurethraforprostateradiotherapyplanning
AT martinjarad visualisingtheurethraforprostateradiotherapyplanning