Cargando…
When numbers fail: do researchers agree on operationalization of published research?
Current discussions on improving the reproducibility of science often revolve around statistical innovations. However, equally important for improving methodological rigour is a valid operationalization of phenomena. Operationalization is the process of translating theoretical constructs into measur...
Autores principales: | Haucke, Matthias, Hoekstra, Rink, van Ravenzwaaij, Don |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191354 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The effect of preregistration on trust in empirical research findings: results of a registered report
por: Field, Sarahanne M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
How best to quantify replication success? A simulation study on the comparison of replication success metrics
por: Muradchanian, Jasmine, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
What do participants think of our research practices? An examination of behavioural psychology participants' preferences
por: Bottesini, Julia G., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences
por: Dougherty, Michael R., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The role of results in deciding to publish: A direct comparison across authors, reviewers, and editors based on an online survey
por: Muradchanian, Jasmine, et al.
Publicado: (2023)