Cargando…
Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification?
INTRODUCTION: Pre‐operative templating using digital radiography is an effective method of planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and requires a generalised fixed magnification factor (MF) or external calibration markers (ECM). The effect on image magnification when changing source‐to‐image dista...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.461 |
_version_ | 1783749653455437824 |
---|---|
author | Holliday, Mia Steward, Adam |
author_facet | Holliday, Mia Steward, Adam |
author_sort | Holliday, Mia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pre‐operative templating using digital radiography is an effective method of planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and requires a generalised fixed magnification factor (MF) or external calibration markers (ECM). The effect on image magnification when changing source‐to‐image distance (SID), object‐to‐image distance (OID) and different imaging conditions is not well described. This study aims to quantify the range of effects manipulation of radiographic parameters can have on image magnification across different body habitus and imaging conditions. METHODS: A simple phantom study was performed. A 25 mm ECM was placed at eight different OID values along the anterior–posterior phantom plane at three different SID values and imaging conditions, and X‐rays were obtained. On each radiograph, the ECM was measured using a line calliper tool by three radiographers and recorded. The MF was calculated and recorded. RESULTS: The smallest observed image MF was 1.16, for an 8 cm OID, 120 cm SID with the ECM placed within the central ray and the X‐ray detector in bucky underneath the X‐ray table. The largest image MF was 1.40 for a 15 cm OID, 100 cm SID with the X‐ray detector placed underneath an emergency department imaging trolley. CONCLUSIONS: Digital pre‐operative templating for THA relies on accurate radiographic positioning and is dependent of the patient body habitus, radiographic parameters and imaging conditions selected by the radiographer. The use of appropriately positioned ECMs – placed medially between the patient’s internally rotated legs at the level of the greater trochanter, lowers the potential for magnification inaccuracies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8424328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84243282021-09-13 Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification? Holliday, Mia Steward, Adam J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Pre‐operative templating using digital radiography is an effective method of planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and requires a generalised fixed magnification factor (MF) or external calibration markers (ECM). The effect on image magnification when changing source‐to‐image distance (SID), object‐to‐image distance (OID) and different imaging conditions is not well described. This study aims to quantify the range of effects manipulation of radiographic parameters can have on image magnification across different body habitus and imaging conditions. METHODS: A simple phantom study was performed. A 25 mm ECM was placed at eight different OID values along the anterior–posterior phantom plane at three different SID values and imaging conditions, and X‐rays were obtained. On each radiograph, the ECM was measured using a line calliper tool by three radiographers and recorded. The MF was calculated and recorded. RESULTS: The smallest observed image MF was 1.16, for an 8 cm OID, 120 cm SID with the ECM placed within the central ray and the X‐ray detector in bucky underneath the X‐ray table. The largest image MF was 1.40 for a 15 cm OID, 100 cm SID with the X‐ray detector placed underneath an emergency department imaging trolley. CONCLUSIONS: Digital pre‐operative templating for THA relies on accurate radiographic positioning and is dependent of the patient body habitus, radiographic parameters and imaging conditions selected by the radiographer. The use of appropriately positioned ECMs – placed medially between the patient’s internally rotated legs at the level of the greater trochanter, lowers the potential for magnification inaccuracies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-15 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8424328/ /pubmed/33590673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.461 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Holliday, Mia Steward, Adam Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification? |
title | Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification? |
title_full | Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification? |
title_fullStr | Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification? |
title_full_unstemmed | Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification? |
title_short | Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification? |
title_sort | pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: how does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.461 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollidaymia preoperativetemplatingfortotalhiparthroplastyhowdoesradiographictechniqueandcalibrationmarkerplacementaffectimagemagnification AT stewardadam preoperativetemplatingfortotalhiparthroplastyhowdoesradiographictechniqueandcalibrationmarkerplacementaffectimagemagnification |