Cargando…

Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification?

INTRODUCTION: Pre‐operative templating using digital radiography is an effective method of planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and requires a generalised fixed magnification factor (MF) or external calibration markers (ECM). The effect on image magnification when changing source‐to‐image dista...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holliday, Mia, Steward, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.461
_version_ 1783749653455437824
author Holliday, Mia
Steward, Adam
author_facet Holliday, Mia
Steward, Adam
author_sort Holliday, Mia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pre‐operative templating using digital radiography is an effective method of planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and requires a generalised fixed magnification factor (MF) or external calibration markers (ECM). The effect on image magnification when changing source‐to‐image distance (SID), object‐to‐image distance (OID) and different imaging conditions is not well described. This study aims to quantify the range of effects manipulation of radiographic parameters can have on image magnification across different body habitus and imaging conditions. METHODS: A simple phantom study was performed. A 25 mm ECM was placed at eight different OID values along the anterior–posterior phantom plane at three different SID values and imaging conditions, and X‐rays were obtained. On each radiograph, the ECM was measured using a line calliper tool by three radiographers and recorded. The MF was calculated and recorded. RESULTS: The smallest observed image MF was 1.16, for an 8 cm OID, 120 cm SID with the ECM placed within the central ray and the X‐ray detector in bucky underneath the X‐ray table. The largest image MF was 1.40 for a 15 cm OID, 100 cm SID with the X‐ray detector placed underneath an emergency department imaging trolley. CONCLUSIONS: Digital pre‐operative templating for THA relies on accurate radiographic positioning and is dependent of the patient body habitus, radiographic parameters and imaging conditions selected by the radiographer. The use of appropriately positioned ECMs – placed medially between the patient’s internally rotated legs at the level of the greater trochanter, lowers the potential for magnification inaccuracies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8424328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84243282021-09-13 Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification? Holliday, Mia Steward, Adam J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Pre‐operative templating using digital radiography is an effective method of planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and requires a generalised fixed magnification factor (MF) or external calibration markers (ECM). The effect on image magnification when changing source‐to‐image distance (SID), object‐to‐image distance (OID) and different imaging conditions is not well described. This study aims to quantify the range of effects manipulation of radiographic parameters can have on image magnification across different body habitus and imaging conditions. METHODS: A simple phantom study was performed. A 25 mm ECM was placed at eight different OID values along the anterior–posterior phantom plane at three different SID values and imaging conditions, and X‐rays were obtained. On each radiograph, the ECM was measured using a line calliper tool by three radiographers and recorded. The MF was calculated and recorded. RESULTS: The smallest observed image MF was 1.16, for an 8 cm OID, 120 cm SID with the ECM placed within the central ray and the X‐ray detector in bucky underneath the X‐ray table. The largest image MF was 1.40 for a 15 cm OID, 100 cm SID with the X‐ray detector placed underneath an emergency department imaging trolley. CONCLUSIONS: Digital pre‐operative templating for THA relies on accurate radiographic positioning and is dependent of the patient body habitus, radiographic parameters and imaging conditions selected by the radiographer. The use of appropriately positioned ECMs – placed medially between the patient’s internally rotated legs at the level of the greater trochanter, lowers the potential for magnification inaccuracies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-15 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8424328/ /pubmed/33590673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.461 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Holliday, Mia
Steward, Adam
Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification?
title Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification?
title_full Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification?
title_fullStr Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification?
title_full_unstemmed Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification?
title_short Pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification?
title_sort pre‐operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: how does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.461
work_keys_str_mv AT hollidaymia preoperativetemplatingfortotalhiparthroplastyhowdoesradiographictechniqueandcalibrationmarkerplacementaffectimagemagnification
AT stewardadam preoperativetemplatingfortotalhiparthroplastyhowdoesradiographictechniqueandcalibrationmarkerplacementaffectimagemagnification