Cargando…

Adecuación de la prescripción en pacientes mayores polimedicados en atención primaria. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado por grupos PHARM-PC

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led systematic review of medications on: potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), health outcomes and costs. DESIGN: Prospective, open, controlled and cluster-randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Six primary care clinics from Balearic Island...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martínez-Sotelo, Jesús, Pinteño-Blanco, Manuel, García-Ramos, Rosario, Cadavid-Torres, María Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102124
_version_ 1783749677537034240
author Martínez-Sotelo, Jesús
Pinteño-Blanco, Manuel
García-Ramos, Rosario
Cadavid-Torres, María Isabel
author_facet Martínez-Sotelo, Jesús
Pinteño-Blanco, Manuel
García-Ramos, Rosario
Cadavid-Torres, María Isabel
author_sort Martínez-Sotelo, Jesús
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led systematic review of medications on: potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), health outcomes and costs. DESIGN: Prospective, open, controlled and cluster-randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Six primary care clinics from Balearic Islands. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two clusters (21 per group), and 549 patients aged ≥65 years and ≥5 chronic medications were included; of which 277 were allocated to Intervention Group (IG) and 272 to Control Group (CG). Patients were excluded if they were: institutionalized, temporarily displaced, routinely monitored under private healthcare, or home care. INTERVENTION: PIM detection by the pharmacist using a combination of explicit and implicit methods; and communication of the most appropriate therapeutic strategies to the physician. MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of patients with PIM and mean number of PIM/patient (main outcomes); and morbidity, mortality, and costs (secondary outcomes) were assessed. STATISTICAL PLAN: Following an intention-to-treat approach, quantitative and qualitative outcomes variables were compared by T-Student and Chi-square tests, respectively. Results were providing as difference in proportions for qualitative outcomes and difference in means for quantitative outcomes with respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: After intervention, proportion of patients with PIM decreased by 13.7% (95% CI: 9.3; 18.2) more in IG than CG. Mean number of PIM/patient and mean cost of PIM/patient decreased by 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32; 0.54) and 72.11€ (95% CI: 26.15; 118.06) more in IG than CG, respectively. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in morbidity, mortality or costs of healthcare resources. CONCLUSIONS: PIM detection and recommendations provided by pharmacist could contribute to reduce significantly PIM and drug expenditure; but without reaching statistically significant differences in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resources costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8424444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84244442021-09-13 Adecuación de la prescripción en pacientes mayores polimedicados en atención primaria. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado por grupos PHARM-PC Martínez-Sotelo, Jesús Pinteño-Blanco, Manuel García-Ramos, Rosario Cadavid-Torres, María Isabel Aten Primaria Original OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led systematic review of medications on: potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), health outcomes and costs. DESIGN: Prospective, open, controlled and cluster-randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Six primary care clinics from Balearic Islands. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two clusters (21 per group), and 549 patients aged ≥65 years and ≥5 chronic medications were included; of which 277 were allocated to Intervention Group (IG) and 272 to Control Group (CG). Patients were excluded if they were: institutionalized, temporarily displaced, routinely monitored under private healthcare, or home care. INTERVENTION: PIM detection by the pharmacist using a combination of explicit and implicit methods; and communication of the most appropriate therapeutic strategies to the physician. MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of patients with PIM and mean number of PIM/patient (main outcomes); and morbidity, mortality, and costs (secondary outcomes) were assessed. STATISTICAL PLAN: Following an intention-to-treat approach, quantitative and qualitative outcomes variables were compared by T-Student and Chi-square tests, respectively. Results were providing as difference in proportions for qualitative outcomes and difference in means for quantitative outcomes with respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: After intervention, proportion of patients with PIM decreased by 13.7% (95% CI: 9.3; 18.2) more in IG than CG. Mean number of PIM/patient and mean cost of PIM/patient decreased by 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32; 0.54) and 72.11€ (95% CI: 26.15; 118.06) more in IG than CG, respectively. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in morbidity, mortality or costs of healthcare resources. CONCLUSIONS: PIM detection and recommendations provided by pharmacist could contribute to reduce significantly PIM and drug expenditure; but without reaching statistically significant differences in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resources costs. Elsevier 2021-12 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8424444/ /pubmed/34488034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102124 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original
Martínez-Sotelo, Jesús
Pinteño-Blanco, Manuel
García-Ramos, Rosario
Cadavid-Torres, María Isabel
Adecuación de la prescripción en pacientes mayores polimedicados en atención primaria. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado por grupos PHARM-PC
title Adecuación de la prescripción en pacientes mayores polimedicados en atención primaria. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado por grupos PHARM-PC
title_full Adecuación de la prescripción en pacientes mayores polimedicados en atención primaria. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado por grupos PHARM-PC
title_fullStr Adecuación de la prescripción en pacientes mayores polimedicados en atención primaria. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado por grupos PHARM-PC
title_full_unstemmed Adecuación de la prescripción en pacientes mayores polimedicados en atención primaria. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado por grupos PHARM-PC
title_short Adecuación de la prescripción en pacientes mayores polimedicados en atención primaria. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado por grupos PHARM-PC
title_sort adecuación de la prescripción en pacientes mayores polimedicados en atención primaria. ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado por grupos pharm-pc
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102124
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezsotelojesus adecuaciondelaprescripcionenpacientesmayorespolimedicadosenatencionprimariaensayoclinicocontroladoaleatorizadoporgrupospharmpc
AT pintenoblancomanuel adecuaciondelaprescripcionenpacientesmayorespolimedicadosenatencionprimariaensayoclinicocontroladoaleatorizadoporgrupospharmpc
AT garciaramosrosario adecuaciondelaprescripcionenpacientesmayorespolimedicadosenatencionprimariaensayoclinicocontroladoaleatorizadoporgrupospharmpc
AT cadavidtorresmariaisabel adecuaciondelaprescripcionenpacientesmayorespolimedicadosenatencionprimariaensayoclinicocontroladoaleatorizadoporgrupospharmpc