Cargando…
Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists
OBJECTIVES: Many chronic eye conditions are managed within public hospital ophthalmology clinics resulting in encumbered wait lists. Integrated care schemes can increase system capacity. In order to direct implementation of a public hospital-based integrated eye care model, this study aims to evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34493511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047246 |
_version_ | 1783749743866806272 |
---|---|
author | Khou, Vincent Ly, Angelica Moore, Lindsay Markoulli, Maria Kalloniatis, Michael Yapp, Michael Hennessy, Michael Zangerl, Barbara |
author_facet | Khou, Vincent Ly, Angelica Moore, Lindsay Markoulli, Maria Kalloniatis, Michael Yapp, Michael Hennessy, Michael Zangerl, Barbara |
author_sort | Khou, Vincent |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Many chronic eye conditions are managed within public hospital ophthalmology clinics resulting in encumbered wait lists. Integrated care schemes can increase system capacity. In order to direct implementation of a public hospital-based integrated eye care model, this study aims to evaluate the quality of referrals for new patients through information content, assess triage decisions of newly referred patients and evaluate the consistency of referral content for new patients referred multiple times. DESIGN: A retrospective and prospective review of all referral forms for new patients referred to a public hospital ophthalmology clinic between January 2016 and September 2017, and September 2017 and August 2018, respectively. SETTING: A referral-only public hospital ophthalmology clinic in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 418 new patients on existing non-urgent wait lists waiting to be allocated an initial appointment, and 528 patients who were newly referred. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the information content of referrals for new patients. The secondary outcomes were triage outcomes for new incoming referrals, and the number of new patients with multiple referrals. RESULTS: Of the wait-listed referrals, 0.2% were complete in referral content compared with 9.8% of new incoming referrals (p<0.001). Of new incoming referrals, 56.7% were triaged to a non-urgent clinic. Multiple referrals were received for 49 patients, with no change in the amount of referral content. CONCLUSIONS: Most referrals were incomplete in content, leading to triage based on limited clinical information. Some new patients were referred multiple times with their second referral containing a similar amount of content as their first. Lengthy wait lists could be prevented by improving administrative processes and communication between the referral centre and referrers. The future implementation of an integrated eye care model at the study setting could sustainably cut wait lists for patients with chronic eye conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8424861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84248612021-09-29 Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists Khou, Vincent Ly, Angelica Moore, Lindsay Markoulli, Maria Kalloniatis, Michael Yapp, Michael Hennessy, Michael Zangerl, Barbara BMJ Open Ophthalmology OBJECTIVES: Many chronic eye conditions are managed within public hospital ophthalmology clinics resulting in encumbered wait lists. Integrated care schemes can increase system capacity. In order to direct implementation of a public hospital-based integrated eye care model, this study aims to evaluate the quality of referrals for new patients through information content, assess triage decisions of newly referred patients and evaluate the consistency of referral content for new patients referred multiple times. DESIGN: A retrospective and prospective review of all referral forms for new patients referred to a public hospital ophthalmology clinic between January 2016 and September 2017, and September 2017 and August 2018, respectively. SETTING: A referral-only public hospital ophthalmology clinic in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 418 new patients on existing non-urgent wait lists waiting to be allocated an initial appointment, and 528 patients who were newly referred. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the information content of referrals for new patients. The secondary outcomes were triage outcomes for new incoming referrals, and the number of new patients with multiple referrals. RESULTS: Of the wait-listed referrals, 0.2% were complete in referral content compared with 9.8% of new incoming referrals (p<0.001). Of new incoming referrals, 56.7% were triaged to a non-urgent clinic. Multiple referrals were received for 49 patients, with no change in the amount of referral content. CONCLUSIONS: Most referrals were incomplete in content, leading to triage based on limited clinical information. Some new patients were referred multiple times with their second referral containing a similar amount of content as their first. Lengthy wait lists could be prevented by improving administrative processes and communication between the referral centre and referrers. The future implementation of an integrated eye care model at the study setting could sustainably cut wait lists for patients with chronic eye conditions. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8424861/ /pubmed/34493511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047246 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Ophthalmology Khou, Vincent Ly, Angelica Moore, Lindsay Markoulli, Maria Kalloniatis, Michael Yapp, Michael Hennessy, Michael Zangerl, Barbara Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists |
title | Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists |
title_full | Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists |
title_fullStr | Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists |
title_short | Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists |
title_sort | review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists |
topic | Ophthalmology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34493511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khouvincent reviewofreferralsrevealtheimpactofreferralcontentonthetriageandmanagementofophthalmologywaitlists AT lyangelica reviewofreferralsrevealtheimpactofreferralcontentonthetriageandmanagementofophthalmologywaitlists AT moorelindsay reviewofreferralsrevealtheimpactofreferralcontentonthetriageandmanagementofophthalmologywaitlists AT markoullimaria reviewofreferralsrevealtheimpactofreferralcontentonthetriageandmanagementofophthalmologywaitlists AT kalloniatismichael reviewofreferralsrevealtheimpactofreferralcontentonthetriageandmanagementofophthalmologywaitlists AT yappmichael reviewofreferralsrevealtheimpactofreferralcontentonthetriageandmanagementofophthalmologywaitlists AT hennessymichael reviewofreferralsrevealtheimpactofreferralcontentonthetriageandmanagementofophthalmologywaitlists AT zangerlbarbara reviewofreferralsrevealtheimpactofreferralcontentonthetriageandmanagementofophthalmologywaitlists |