Cargando…

Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is the most common disease in the cervical spine, affecting patients around 50–55 year of age. An operative treatment is common clinical praxis when non-operative treatment fails. The controversy is in the choice of operative treatment, conducting either anterior c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holy, Marek, MacDowall, Anna, Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti, Olerud, Class
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34496941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05492-2
_version_ 1783749772933332992
author Holy, Marek
MacDowall, Anna
Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti
Olerud, Class
author_facet Holy, Marek
MacDowall, Anna
Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti
Olerud, Class
author_sort Holy, Marek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is the most common disease in the cervical spine, affecting patients around 50–55 year of age. An operative treatment is common clinical praxis when non-operative treatment fails. The controversy is in the choice of operative treatment, conducting either anterior cervical decompression and fusion or posterior foraminotomy. The study objective is to evaluate short- and long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and posterior foraminotomy (PF) METHODS: A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial with 1:1 randomization, ACDF vs. PF including 110 patients. The primary aim is to evaluate if PF is non-inferior to ACDF using a non-inferiority design with ACDF as “active control.” The neck disability index (NDI) is the primary outcome measure, and duration of follow-up is 2 years. DISCUSSION: Due to absence of high level of evidence, the authors believe that a RCT will improve the evidence for using the different surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy and strengthen current surgical treatment recommendation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04177849. Registered on November 26, 2019
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8425018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84250182021-09-10 Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Holy, Marek MacDowall, Anna Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti Olerud, Class Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is the most common disease in the cervical spine, affecting patients around 50–55 year of age. An operative treatment is common clinical praxis when non-operative treatment fails. The controversy is in the choice of operative treatment, conducting either anterior cervical decompression and fusion or posterior foraminotomy. The study objective is to evaluate short- and long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and posterior foraminotomy (PF) METHODS: A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial with 1:1 randomization, ACDF vs. PF including 110 patients. The primary aim is to evaluate if PF is non-inferior to ACDF using a non-inferiority design with ACDF as “active control.” The neck disability index (NDI) is the primary outcome measure, and duration of follow-up is 2 years. DISCUSSION: Due to absence of high level of evidence, the authors believe that a RCT will improve the evidence for using the different surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy and strengthen current surgical treatment recommendation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04177849. Registered on November 26, 2019 BioMed Central 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8425018/ /pubmed/34496941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05492-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Holy, Marek
MacDowall, Anna
Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti
Olerud, Class
Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34496941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05492-2
work_keys_str_mv AT holymarek operativetreatmentofcervicalradiculopathyanteriorcervicaldecompressionandfusioncomparedwithposteriorforaminotomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT macdowallanna operativetreatmentofcervicalradiculopathyanteriorcervicaldecompressionandfusioncomparedwithposteriorforaminotomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sigmundssonfreyrgauti operativetreatmentofcervicalradiculopathyanteriorcervicaldecompressionandfusioncomparedwithposteriorforaminotomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT olerudclass operativetreatmentofcervicalradiculopathyanteriorcervicaldecompressionandfusioncomparedwithposteriorforaminotomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial