Cargando…
Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter
Correcting misconceptions and false beliefs are important for injecting reliable information about COVID-19 into public discourse, but what impact does this have on the continued proliferation of misinforming claims? Fact-checking organisations produce content with the aim of reducing misinformation...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102732 |
_version_ | 1783749776710303744 |
---|---|
author | Burel, Grégoire Farrell, Tracie Alani, Harith |
author_facet | Burel, Grégoire Farrell, Tracie Alani, Harith |
author_sort | Burel, Grégoire |
collection | PubMed |
description | Correcting misconceptions and false beliefs are important for injecting reliable information about COVID-19 into public discourse, but what impact does this have on the continued proliferation of misinforming claims? Fact-checking organisations produce content with the aim of reducing misinformation spread, but our knowledge of its impact on misinformation for particular topics and demographics is limited. In this article, we explore the relation between misinformation and fact-checking spread during the COVID-19 pandemic for different topics, user demographics and attributes. We specifically follow misinformation and fact-checks emerging from December 2019 until the 4th of January 2021 on Twitter. Using a combination of spread variance analysis, impulse response modelling and causal analysis, we highlight the bidirectional, weak causation spread behaviour between misinformation and fact-checks. Although we observe that fact-checks about COVID-19 are appearing fairly quickly after misinformation is circulated, its ability to reduce overall misinformation spread appears to be limited. This is especially visible for misinformation about conspiracy theories and the causes of the virus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8425034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84250342021-09-08 Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter Burel, Grégoire Farrell, Tracie Alani, Harith Inf Process Manag Article Correcting misconceptions and false beliefs are important for injecting reliable information about COVID-19 into public discourse, but what impact does this have on the continued proliferation of misinforming claims? Fact-checking organisations produce content with the aim of reducing misinformation spread, but our knowledge of its impact on misinformation for particular topics and demographics is limited. In this article, we explore the relation between misinformation and fact-checking spread during the COVID-19 pandemic for different topics, user demographics and attributes. We specifically follow misinformation and fact-checks emerging from December 2019 until the 4th of January 2021 on Twitter. Using a combination of spread variance analysis, impulse response modelling and causal analysis, we highlight the bidirectional, weak causation spread behaviour between misinformation and fact-checks. Although we observe that fact-checks about COVID-19 are appearing fairly quickly after misinformation is circulated, its ability to reduce overall misinformation spread appears to be limited. This is especially visible for misinformation about conspiracy theories and the causes of the virus. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-11 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8425034/ /pubmed/34511703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102732 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Burel, Grégoire Farrell, Tracie Alani, Harith Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter |
title | Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter |
title_full | Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter |
title_fullStr | Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter |
title_full_unstemmed | Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter |
title_short | Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter |
title_sort | demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of covid-19 misinformation and fact-checks on twitter |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102732 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burelgregoire demographicsandtopicsimpactonthecospreadofcovid19misinformationandfactchecksontwitter AT farrelltracie demographicsandtopicsimpactonthecospreadofcovid19misinformationandfactchecksontwitter AT alaniharith demographicsandtopicsimpactonthecospreadofcovid19misinformationandfactchecksontwitter |