Cargando…

Evaluating the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens program

BACKGROUND: Physical activity guidelines recommend young people engage in regular muscle-strengthening activities (e.g., resistance training [RT]). However, few school-based physical activity interventions have been delivered at-scale or promoted RT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reach,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kennedy, Sarah G., Smith, Jordan J., Estabrooks, Paul A., Nathan, Nicole, Noetel, Mike, Morgan, Philip J., Salmon, Jo, Dos Santos, Gessika C., Lubans, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34496861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01195-8
_version_ 1783749780723204096
author Kennedy, Sarah G.
Smith, Jordan J.
Estabrooks, Paul A.
Nathan, Nicole
Noetel, Mike
Morgan, Philip J.
Salmon, Jo
Dos Santos, Gessika C.
Lubans, David R.
author_facet Kennedy, Sarah G.
Smith, Jordan J.
Estabrooks, Paul A.
Nathan, Nicole
Noetel, Mike
Morgan, Philip J.
Salmon, Jo
Dos Santos, Gessika C.
Lubans, David R.
author_sort Kennedy, Sarah G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical activity guidelines recommend young people engage in regular muscle-strengthening activities (e.g., resistance training [RT]). However, few school-based physical activity interventions have been delivered at-scale or promoted RT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens (RT for Teens) program. METHODS: Data were collected between August 2015 and October 2020. RE-AIM was operationalized as: (i) Reach: number and characteristics of students estimated to be exposed to the program; (ii) Effectiveness: impact of the program on student-level outcomes measured in a subsample of 750 students from 17 schools; (iii) Adoption: number and representativeness of schools with one or more teachers trained to deliver the program; (iv) Implementation: extent to which the program was delivered as intended; and (v) Maintenance: extent to which the program was sustained in schools. RESULTS: The estimated program reach was ~ 10,000 students, out of a total student population of ~ 200,000 (~ 5%). Students were from diverse socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds. Improvements in muscular fitness, RT self-efficacy, perceived cardiorespiratory fitness and flexibility, and participation in muscle-strengthening physical activities were documented. A total of 30 workshops were delivered, involving 468 teachers from 249 schools from diverse geographical regions. Implementation varied considerably, with teachers adapting the program to suit the context of their school and student cohorts. However, RT skill development and the promotion of muscular fitness were the session components delivered most during sessions. Teachers’ adherence to the SAAFE (Supportive, Active, Autonomous, Fair and Enjoyable) teaching principles was high. Approximately 30% of teachers (144/476) registered to use the RT for Teens app. At the school-level, 37% (93/249) of schools had at least one registered user (teacher and/or student). A total of 2,336 workouts and 3,116 fitness tests were completed by registered users. Of the 249 schools represented, 51 (20.5%) sent an additional (previously untrained) teacher to a second workshop. CONCLUSIONS: The RT for Teens program had broad reach and adoption. However, intervention delivery varied considerably across schools and additional support strategies are required to optimize intervention implementation and maintain program delivery over time. Future studies will benefit from the utilization of accepted frameworks, recommendations and guidelines for implementation research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000352808), retrospectively registered 1(st) February 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01195-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8425054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84250542021-09-10 Evaluating the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens program Kennedy, Sarah G. Smith, Jordan J. Estabrooks, Paul A. Nathan, Nicole Noetel, Mike Morgan, Philip J. Salmon, Jo Dos Santos, Gessika C. Lubans, David R. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Physical activity guidelines recommend young people engage in regular muscle-strengthening activities (e.g., resistance training [RT]). However, few school-based physical activity interventions have been delivered at-scale or promoted RT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens (RT for Teens) program. METHODS: Data were collected between August 2015 and October 2020. RE-AIM was operationalized as: (i) Reach: number and characteristics of students estimated to be exposed to the program; (ii) Effectiveness: impact of the program on student-level outcomes measured in a subsample of 750 students from 17 schools; (iii) Adoption: number and representativeness of schools with one or more teachers trained to deliver the program; (iv) Implementation: extent to which the program was delivered as intended; and (v) Maintenance: extent to which the program was sustained in schools. RESULTS: The estimated program reach was ~ 10,000 students, out of a total student population of ~ 200,000 (~ 5%). Students were from diverse socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds. Improvements in muscular fitness, RT self-efficacy, perceived cardiorespiratory fitness and flexibility, and participation in muscle-strengthening physical activities were documented. A total of 30 workshops were delivered, involving 468 teachers from 249 schools from diverse geographical regions. Implementation varied considerably, with teachers adapting the program to suit the context of their school and student cohorts. However, RT skill development and the promotion of muscular fitness were the session components delivered most during sessions. Teachers’ adherence to the SAAFE (Supportive, Active, Autonomous, Fair and Enjoyable) teaching principles was high. Approximately 30% of teachers (144/476) registered to use the RT for Teens app. At the school-level, 37% (93/249) of schools had at least one registered user (teacher and/or student). A total of 2,336 workouts and 3,116 fitness tests were completed by registered users. Of the 249 schools represented, 51 (20.5%) sent an additional (previously untrained) teacher to a second workshop. CONCLUSIONS: The RT for Teens program had broad reach and adoption. However, intervention delivery varied considerably across schools and additional support strategies are required to optimize intervention implementation and maintain program delivery over time. Future studies will benefit from the utilization of accepted frameworks, recommendations and guidelines for implementation research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000352808), retrospectively registered 1(st) February 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01195-8. BioMed Central 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8425054/ /pubmed/34496861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01195-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kennedy, Sarah G.
Smith, Jordan J.
Estabrooks, Paul A.
Nathan, Nicole
Noetel, Mike
Morgan, Philip J.
Salmon, Jo
Dos Santos, Gessika C.
Lubans, David R.
Evaluating the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens program
title Evaluating the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens program
title_full Evaluating the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens program
title_fullStr Evaluating the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens program
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens program
title_short Evaluating the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens program
title_sort evaluating the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the resistance training for teens program
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34496861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01195-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kennedysarahg evaluatingthereacheffectivenessadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftheresistancetrainingforteensprogram
AT smithjordanj evaluatingthereacheffectivenessadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftheresistancetrainingforteensprogram
AT estabrookspaula evaluatingthereacheffectivenessadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftheresistancetrainingforteensprogram
AT nathannicole evaluatingthereacheffectivenessadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftheresistancetrainingforteensprogram
AT noetelmike evaluatingthereacheffectivenessadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftheresistancetrainingforteensprogram
AT morganphilipj evaluatingthereacheffectivenessadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftheresistancetrainingforteensprogram
AT salmonjo evaluatingthereacheffectivenessadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftheresistancetrainingforteensprogram
AT dossantosgessikac evaluatingthereacheffectivenessadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftheresistancetrainingforteensprogram
AT lubansdavidr evaluatingthereacheffectivenessadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftheresistancetrainingforteensprogram