Cargando…

Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Performance in a Pediatric In Situ Simulation Using Multi-Source Feedback

Introduction Multi-source feedback (MSF) is an evaluation method mandated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The Queen’s Simulation Assessment Tool (QSAT) has been validated as being able to distinguish between resident performances in a simulation setting. The QSAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Michael C, Elliott, Nicole C, Begany, Diane P, Best, Katie M, Cook, Matthew D, Jong, Michael R, Matuzsan, Zachary M, Morolla, Louis A, Partington, Suzanne S, Kane, Bryan G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522472
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16812
_version_ 1783749782817210368
author Nguyen, Michael C
Elliott, Nicole C
Begany, Diane P
Best, Katie M
Cook, Matthew D
Jong, Michael R
Matuzsan, Zachary M
Morolla, Louis A
Partington, Suzanne S
Kane, Bryan G
author_facet Nguyen, Michael C
Elliott, Nicole C
Begany, Diane P
Best, Katie M
Cook, Matthew D
Jong, Michael R
Matuzsan, Zachary M
Morolla, Louis A
Partington, Suzanne S
Kane, Bryan G
author_sort Nguyen, Michael C
collection PubMed
description Introduction Multi-source feedback (MSF) is an evaluation method mandated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The Queen’s Simulation Assessment Tool (QSAT) has been validated as being able to distinguish between resident performances in a simulation setting. The QSAT has also been demonstrated to have excellent MSF agreement when used in an adult simulation performed in a simulation lab. Using the QSAT, this study sought to determine the degree of agreement of MSF in a single pediatric (Peds) simulation case conducted in situ in a Peds emergency department (ED). Methods This Institutional Review Board-approved study was conducted in a four-year emergency medicine residency. A Peds resuscitation case was developed with specific behavioral anchors on the QSAT, which uses a 1-5 scale in each of five categories: Primary Assessment, Diagnostic Actions, Therapeutic Actions, Communication, and Overall Assessment. Data was gathered from six participants for each simulation. The lead resident self-evaluated and received MSF from a junior peer resident, a fixed Peds ED nurse, a random ED nurse, and two faculty (one fixed, the other from a dyad). The agreement was calculated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results The simulation was performed on 35 separate days over two academic years. A total of 106 MSF participants were enrolled. Enrollees included three faculty members, 35 team leaders, 34 peers, 33 ED registered nurses (RN), and one Peds RN; 50% of the enrollees were female (n=53). Mean QSAT scores ranged from 20.7 to 23.4. A fair agreement was demonstrated via ICC; there was no statistically significant difference between sources of MSF. Removing self-evaluation led to the highest ICC. ICC for any single or grouped non-faculty source of MSF was poor. Conclusion Using the QSAT, the findings from this single-site cohort suggest that faculty must be included in MSF. Self-evaluation appears to be of limited value in MSF with the QSAT. The degree of MSF agreement as gathered by the QSAT was lower in this cohort than previously reported for adult simulation cases performed in the simulation lab. This may be due to either the pediatric nature of the case, the location of the simulation, or both.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8425063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84250632021-09-13 Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Performance in a Pediatric In Situ Simulation Using Multi-Source Feedback Nguyen, Michael C Elliott, Nicole C Begany, Diane P Best, Katie M Cook, Matthew D Jong, Michael R Matuzsan, Zachary M Morolla, Louis A Partington, Suzanne S Kane, Bryan G Cureus Emergency Medicine Introduction Multi-source feedback (MSF) is an evaluation method mandated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The Queen’s Simulation Assessment Tool (QSAT) has been validated as being able to distinguish between resident performances in a simulation setting. The QSAT has also been demonstrated to have excellent MSF agreement when used in an adult simulation performed in a simulation lab. Using the QSAT, this study sought to determine the degree of agreement of MSF in a single pediatric (Peds) simulation case conducted in situ in a Peds emergency department (ED). Methods This Institutional Review Board-approved study was conducted in a four-year emergency medicine residency. A Peds resuscitation case was developed with specific behavioral anchors on the QSAT, which uses a 1-5 scale in each of five categories: Primary Assessment, Diagnostic Actions, Therapeutic Actions, Communication, and Overall Assessment. Data was gathered from six participants for each simulation. The lead resident self-evaluated and received MSF from a junior peer resident, a fixed Peds ED nurse, a random ED nurse, and two faculty (one fixed, the other from a dyad). The agreement was calculated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results The simulation was performed on 35 separate days over two academic years. A total of 106 MSF participants were enrolled. Enrollees included three faculty members, 35 team leaders, 34 peers, 33 ED registered nurses (RN), and one Peds RN; 50% of the enrollees were female (n=53). Mean QSAT scores ranged from 20.7 to 23.4. A fair agreement was demonstrated via ICC; there was no statistically significant difference between sources of MSF. Removing self-evaluation led to the highest ICC. ICC for any single or grouped non-faculty source of MSF was poor. Conclusion Using the QSAT, the findings from this single-site cohort suggest that faculty must be included in MSF. Self-evaluation appears to be of limited value in MSF with the QSAT. The degree of MSF agreement as gathered by the QSAT was lower in this cohort than previously reported for adult simulation cases performed in the simulation lab. This may be due to either the pediatric nature of the case, the location of the simulation, or both. Cureus 2021-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8425063/ /pubmed/34522472 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16812 Text en Copyright © 2021, Nguyen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Nguyen, Michael C
Elliott, Nicole C
Begany, Diane P
Best, Katie M
Cook, Matthew D
Jong, Michael R
Matuzsan, Zachary M
Morolla, Louis A
Partington, Suzanne S
Kane, Bryan G
Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Performance in a Pediatric In Situ Simulation Using Multi-Source Feedback
title Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Performance in a Pediatric In Situ Simulation Using Multi-Source Feedback
title_full Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Performance in a Pediatric In Situ Simulation Using Multi-Source Feedback
title_fullStr Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Performance in a Pediatric In Situ Simulation Using Multi-Source Feedback
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Performance in a Pediatric In Situ Simulation Using Multi-Source Feedback
title_short Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Performance in a Pediatric In Situ Simulation Using Multi-Source Feedback
title_sort assessment of emergency medicine resident performance in a pediatric in situ simulation using multi-source feedback
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522472
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16812
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenmichaelc assessmentofemergencymedicineresidentperformanceinapediatricinsitusimulationusingmultisourcefeedback
AT elliottnicolec assessmentofemergencymedicineresidentperformanceinapediatricinsitusimulationusingmultisourcefeedback
AT beganydianep assessmentofemergencymedicineresidentperformanceinapediatricinsitusimulationusingmultisourcefeedback
AT bestkatiem assessmentofemergencymedicineresidentperformanceinapediatricinsitusimulationusingmultisourcefeedback
AT cookmatthewd assessmentofemergencymedicineresidentperformanceinapediatricinsitusimulationusingmultisourcefeedback
AT jongmichaelr assessmentofemergencymedicineresidentperformanceinapediatricinsitusimulationusingmultisourcefeedback
AT matuzsanzacharym assessmentofemergencymedicineresidentperformanceinapediatricinsitusimulationusingmultisourcefeedback
AT morollalouisa assessmentofemergencymedicineresidentperformanceinapediatricinsitusimulationusingmultisourcefeedback
AT partingtonsuzannes assessmentofemergencymedicineresidentperformanceinapediatricinsitusimulationusingmultisourcefeedback
AT kanebryang assessmentofemergencymedicineresidentperformanceinapediatricinsitusimulationusingmultisourcefeedback