Cargando…

Exploring experiences of implementing standardized cancer patient pathways within investigatory units – a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: In the implementation of standardized cancer patient pathways (CPPs), the investigatory units, endoscopy, radiology and pathology, are crucial to ensure an eventual cancer diagnosis. However, when evaluating the implementation of CPPs, little attention has been paid to the healthcare pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winterling, Jeanette, Delilovic, Sara, Dervish, Jessica, Gunarsson, Malin, Åhström, Mårten, Hasson, Henna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34493265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06915-1
_version_ 1783749786959085568
author Winterling, Jeanette
Delilovic, Sara
Dervish, Jessica
Gunarsson, Malin
Åhström, Mårten
Hasson, Henna
author_facet Winterling, Jeanette
Delilovic, Sara
Dervish, Jessica
Gunarsson, Malin
Åhström, Mårten
Hasson, Henna
author_sort Winterling, Jeanette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the implementation of standardized cancer patient pathways (CPPs), the investigatory units, endoscopy, radiology and pathology, are crucial to ensure an eventual cancer diagnosis. However, when evaluating the implementation of CPPs, little attention has been paid to the healthcare professionals working in these units. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of the implementation of CPPs among health professionals in investigatory units. METHODS: This descriptive qualitative study included 55 health professionals working in investigatory units. Participants were interviewed in 2017–2018, and data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The health professionals reported benefits, facilitators and challenges when describing their experiences of implementing CPPs. Benefits included that CPP improved collaboration and increased focus on the patients. Facilitators in the implementation process included pre-existing well-functioning work processes and having supportive functions (e.g. coordinators). Challenges included the lack of staff and clinical equipment, as well as unjustified time-slots and incorrect referrals. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that most health professionals working in investigatory units’ experience benefits with the implementation of CPP, but the lack of resources was especially hard to overcome. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06915-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8425083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84250832021-09-10 Exploring experiences of implementing standardized cancer patient pathways within investigatory units – a qualitative study Winterling, Jeanette Delilovic, Sara Dervish, Jessica Gunarsson, Malin Åhström, Mårten Hasson, Henna BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In the implementation of standardized cancer patient pathways (CPPs), the investigatory units, endoscopy, radiology and pathology, are crucial to ensure an eventual cancer diagnosis. However, when evaluating the implementation of CPPs, little attention has been paid to the healthcare professionals working in these units. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of the implementation of CPPs among health professionals in investigatory units. METHODS: This descriptive qualitative study included 55 health professionals working in investigatory units. Participants were interviewed in 2017–2018, and data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The health professionals reported benefits, facilitators and challenges when describing their experiences of implementing CPPs. Benefits included that CPP improved collaboration and increased focus on the patients. Facilitators in the implementation process included pre-existing well-functioning work processes and having supportive functions (e.g. coordinators). Challenges included the lack of staff and clinical equipment, as well as unjustified time-slots and incorrect referrals. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that most health professionals working in investigatory units’ experience benefits with the implementation of CPP, but the lack of resources was especially hard to overcome. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06915-1. BioMed Central 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8425083/ /pubmed/34493265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06915-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Winterling, Jeanette
Delilovic, Sara
Dervish, Jessica
Gunarsson, Malin
Åhström, Mårten
Hasson, Henna
Exploring experiences of implementing standardized cancer patient pathways within investigatory units – a qualitative study
title Exploring experiences of implementing standardized cancer patient pathways within investigatory units – a qualitative study
title_full Exploring experiences of implementing standardized cancer patient pathways within investigatory units – a qualitative study
title_fullStr Exploring experiences of implementing standardized cancer patient pathways within investigatory units – a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring experiences of implementing standardized cancer patient pathways within investigatory units – a qualitative study
title_short Exploring experiences of implementing standardized cancer patient pathways within investigatory units – a qualitative study
title_sort exploring experiences of implementing standardized cancer patient pathways within investigatory units – a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34493265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06915-1
work_keys_str_mv AT winterlingjeanette exploringexperiencesofimplementingstandardizedcancerpatientpathwayswithininvestigatoryunitsaqualitativestudy
AT delilovicsara exploringexperiencesofimplementingstandardizedcancerpatientpathwayswithininvestigatoryunitsaqualitativestudy
AT dervishjessica exploringexperiencesofimplementingstandardizedcancerpatientpathwayswithininvestigatoryunitsaqualitativestudy
AT gunarssonmalin exploringexperiencesofimplementingstandardizedcancerpatientpathwayswithininvestigatoryunitsaqualitativestudy
AT ahstrommarten exploringexperiencesofimplementingstandardizedcancerpatientpathwayswithininvestigatoryunitsaqualitativestudy
AT hassonhenna exploringexperiencesofimplementingstandardizedcancerpatientpathwayswithininvestigatoryunitsaqualitativestudy