Cargando…
Interferon-γ release assays for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis: a meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is still a great challenge to global public health. As conventional diagnostic methods for TBM are unsatisfactory, interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) have been introduced for TBM diagnosis tentatively. However, the role of IGRAs for diagnosing TBM remains...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522253 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2019.86994 |
_version_ | 1783749818247544832 |
---|---|
author | Lan, You Chen, Wei Yan, Qun Liu, Wenen |
author_facet | Lan, You Chen, Wei Yan, Qun Liu, Wenen |
author_sort | Lan, You |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is still a great challenge to global public health. As conventional diagnostic methods for TBM are unsatisfactory, interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) have been introduced for TBM diagnosis tentatively. However, the role of IGRAs for diagnosing TBM remains unclear. Thus, we systematically evaluated the diagnostic performance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral blood (PB) IGRAs in TBM to fill this blank. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Relevant studies were systematically searched in both foreign and Chinese databases up to March 2018. Studies in which TBM diagnosis was based on microbiological or clinical criteria were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed through the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Main outcome measures, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), were pooled statistically using random effects models. The potential heterogeneity was explored by threshold effect analysis, subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to test the potential publication bias. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata and Meta-DiSc software. RESULTS: Twenty-six out of 656 publications were eligible for meta-analysis, including 1892 participants in total. The pooled estimates of PB IGRAs for TBM diagnosis are as follows: sensitivity: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78–0.84); specificity: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73–0.78); PLR: 4.23 (95% CI: 2.95–6.07); NLR: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.19–0.32) and DOR: 21.06 (11.91-37.24). The corresponding estimates for CSF IGRAs were obtained: sensitivity: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76–0.85); specificity: 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.92); PLR: 7.87 (95% CI: 4.98–12.46); NLR: 0.19 (95% CI: 0.13–0.29); and DOR: 47.74 (25.02–91.12). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of IGRAs is suboptimal. In terms of cost, turn-around time and accessibility, these assays are unsuitable for use as biomarkers for TBM diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8425237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84252372021-09-13 Interferon-γ release assays for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis: a meta-analysis Lan, You Chen, Wei Yan, Qun Liu, Wenen Arch Med Sci Systematic review/Meta-analysis INTRODUCTION: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is still a great challenge to global public health. As conventional diagnostic methods for TBM are unsatisfactory, interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) have been introduced for TBM diagnosis tentatively. However, the role of IGRAs for diagnosing TBM remains unclear. Thus, we systematically evaluated the diagnostic performance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral blood (PB) IGRAs in TBM to fill this blank. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Relevant studies were systematically searched in both foreign and Chinese databases up to March 2018. Studies in which TBM diagnosis was based on microbiological or clinical criteria were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed through the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Main outcome measures, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), were pooled statistically using random effects models. The potential heterogeneity was explored by threshold effect analysis, subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to test the potential publication bias. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata and Meta-DiSc software. RESULTS: Twenty-six out of 656 publications were eligible for meta-analysis, including 1892 participants in total. The pooled estimates of PB IGRAs for TBM diagnosis are as follows: sensitivity: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78–0.84); specificity: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73–0.78); PLR: 4.23 (95% CI: 2.95–6.07); NLR: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.19–0.32) and DOR: 21.06 (11.91-37.24). The corresponding estimates for CSF IGRAs were obtained: sensitivity: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76–0.85); specificity: 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.92); PLR: 7.87 (95% CI: 4.98–12.46); NLR: 0.19 (95% CI: 0.13–0.29); and DOR: 47.74 (25.02–91.12). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of IGRAs is suboptimal. In terms of cost, turn-around time and accessibility, these assays are unsuitable for use as biomarkers for TBM diagnosis. Termedia Publishing House 2020-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8425237/ /pubmed/34522253 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2019.86994 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Termedia & Banach https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Systematic review/Meta-analysis Lan, You Chen, Wei Yan, Qun Liu, Wenen Interferon-γ release assays for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis: a meta-analysis |
title | Interferon-γ release assays for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Interferon-γ release assays for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Interferon-γ release assays for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Interferon-γ release assays for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Interferon-γ release assays for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | interferon-γ release assays for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis: a meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic review/Meta-analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522253 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2019.86994 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lanyou interferongreleaseassaysfortuberculousmeningitisdiagnosisametaanalysis AT chenwei interferongreleaseassaysfortuberculousmeningitisdiagnosisametaanalysis AT yanqun interferongreleaseassaysfortuberculousmeningitisdiagnosisametaanalysis AT liuwenen interferongreleaseassaysfortuberculousmeningitisdiagnosisametaanalysis |