Cargando…

An in vitro study to compare the influence of two different primers on the peel bond strength between a maxillofacial silicone material and an acrylic resin material versus a composite resin material

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the peel bond strength of an autopolymerizing acrylic resin and a fiberreinforced composite (FRC) resin to a heat temperature vulcanizing maxillofacial silicone (M511) using two different primers. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vitro - comparative stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farooqui, Ruksana, Aras, Meena Ajay, Chitre, Vidya, Rajagopal, Praveen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380817
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_80_21
_version_ 1783749837825507328
author Farooqui, Ruksana
Aras, Meena Ajay
Chitre, Vidya
Rajagopal, Praveen
author_facet Farooqui, Ruksana
Aras, Meena Ajay
Chitre, Vidya
Rajagopal, Praveen
author_sort Farooqui, Ruksana
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the peel bond strength of an autopolymerizing acrylic resin and a fiberreinforced composite (FRC) resin to a heat temperature vulcanizing maxillofacial silicone (M511) using two different primers. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vitro - comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Autopolymerizing acrylic resin and FRC resin specimens with a dimension of 75 mm (length) ×10 mm (width) × 3 mm (height) were fabricated. A total of 60 samples were split into six categories based on the substructure material and primers (A330G primer and Sofreliner tough primer) used to bond the maxillofacial silicone to the FRC and acrylic resin specimens. In a universal testing machine, the peel bond strength was conducted at a 10 mm/min crosshead speed until bonding failure occurred. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and the Tukey's honest significant difference (post hoc test) tests were used to statistically assess the values. RESULTS: The Sofreliner tough primer produced the greatest peel bond strength in both the acrylic resin (0.89690 N/mm) and the FRC resin groups (3.19860 N/mm). Adhesive failures predominated in the acrylic resin group regardless of the primer used. The FRC group showed predominantly cohesive failures with both the A330G primer and Sofreliner tough primer. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that FRC resin combined with Sofreliner tough primer can significantly enhance the peel bond strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8425365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84253652022-07-01 An in vitro study to compare the influence of two different primers on the peel bond strength between a maxillofacial silicone material and an acrylic resin material versus a composite resin material Farooqui, Ruksana Aras, Meena Ajay Chitre, Vidya Rajagopal, Praveen J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the peel bond strength of an autopolymerizing acrylic resin and a fiberreinforced composite (FRC) resin to a heat temperature vulcanizing maxillofacial silicone (M511) using two different primers. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vitro - comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Autopolymerizing acrylic resin and FRC resin specimens with a dimension of 75 mm (length) ×10 mm (width) × 3 mm (height) were fabricated. A total of 60 samples were split into six categories based on the substructure material and primers (A330G primer and Sofreliner tough primer) used to bond the maxillofacial silicone to the FRC and acrylic resin specimens. In a universal testing machine, the peel bond strength was conducted at a 10 mm/min crosshead speed until bonding failure occurred. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and the Tukey's honest significant difference (post hoc test) tests were used to statistically assess the values. RESULTS: The Sofreliner tough primer produced the greatest peel bond strength in both the acrylic resin (0.89690 N/mm) and the FRC resin groups (3.19860 N/mm). Adhesive failures predominated in the acrylic resin group regardless of the primer used. The FRC group showed predominantly cohesive failures with both the A330G primer and Sofreliner tough primer. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that FRC resin combined with Sofreliner tough primer can significantly enhance the peel bond strength. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8425365/ /pubmed/34380817 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_80_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Farooqui, Ruksana
Aras, Meena Ajay
Chitre, Vidya
Rajagopal, Praveen
An in vitro study to compare the influence of two different primers on the peel bond strength between a maxillofacial silicone material and an acrylic resin material versus a composite resin material
title An in vitro study to compare the influence of two different primers on the peel bond strength between a maxillofacial silicone material and an acrylic resin material versus a composite resin material
title_full An in vitro study to compare the influence of two different primers on the peel bond strength between a maxillofacial silicone material and an acrylic resin material versus a composite resin material
title_fullStr An in vitro study to compare the influence of two different primers on the peel bond strength between a maxillofacial silicone material and an acrylic resin material versus a composite resin material
title_full_unstemmed An in vitro study to compare the influence of two different primers on the peel bond strength between a maxillofacial silicone material and an acrylic resin material versus a composite resin material
title_short An in vitro study to compare the influence of two different primers on the peel bond strength between a maxillofacial silicone material and an acrylic resin material versus a composite resin material
title_sort in vitro study to compare the influence of two different primers on the peel bond strength between a maxillofacial silicone material and an acrylic resin material versus a composite resin material
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380817
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_80_21
work_keys_str_mv AT farooquiruksana aninvitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceoftwodifferentprimersonthepeelbondstrengthbetweenamaxillofacialsiliconematerialandanacrylicresinmaterialversusacompositeresinmaterial
AT arasmeenaajay aninvitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceoftwodifferentprimersonthepeelbondstrengthbetweenamaxillofacialsiliconematerialandanacrylicresinmaterialversusacompositeresinmaterial
AT chitrevidya aninvitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceoftwodifferentprimersonthepeelbondstrengthbetweenamaxillofacialsiliconematerialandanacrylicresinmaterialversusacompositeresinmaterial
AT rajagopalpraveen aninvitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceoftwodifferentprimersonthepeelbondstrengthbetweenamaxillofacialsiliconematerialandanacrylicresinmaterialversusacompositeresinmaterial
AT farooquiruksana invitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceoftwodifferentprimersonthepeelbondstrengthbetweenamaxillofacialsiliconematerialandanacrylicresinmaterialversusacompositeresinmaterial
AT arasmeenaajay invitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceoftwodifferentprimersonthepeelbondstrengthbetweenamaxillofacialsiliconematerialandanacrylicresinmaterialversusacompositeresinmaterial
AT chitrevidya invitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceoftwodifferentprimersonthepeelbondstrengthbetweenamaxillofacialsiliconematerialandanacrylicresinmaterialversusacompositeresinmaterial
AT rajagopalpraveen invitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceoftwodifferentprimersonthepeelbondstrengthbetweenamaxillofacialsiliconematerialandanacrylicresinmaterialversusacompositeresinmaterial