Cargando…
Comparative prospective clinical evaluation of computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing milled BioHPP PEEK inlays and Zirconia inlays
AIM: The aim of the present study was to clinically assess the performance of BioHPP PEEK material when used for inlay restoration and to compare it with widely used zirconia inlays. This clinical study was undertaken to evaluate their performance in terms of retention, colour matching, marginal dis...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380810 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_57_21 |
_version_ | 1783749839487500288 |
---|---|
author | Rajamani, Vijaya Kumar Reyal, Sandeep Singh Gowda, Eraiah Mahesh Shashidhar, Muttige Parameshwara |
author_facet | Rajamani, Vijaya Kumar Reyal, Sandeep Singh Gowda, Eraiah Mahesh Shashidhar, Muttige Parameshwara |
author_sort | Rajamani, Vijaya Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of the present study was to clinically assess the performance of BioHPP PEEK material when used for inlay restoration and to compare it with widely used zirconia inlays. This clinical study was undertaken to evaluate their performance in terms of retention, colour matching, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, surface texture, wear-anatomic form, postoperative sensitivity and fracture resistance using the modified Ryge's criteria. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vivo - prospective clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria requiring inlays. The patients were further divided in two groups: Group A - Consisted of 20 permanent maxillary and mandibular carious posterior teeth restored with BioHPP PEEK inlays and Group B - Consisted of 20 permanent maxillary and mandibular carious posterior teeth restored with CAD/CAM zirconia inlays (sintered monolithic zirconia, Zolid, Amann Girrbach AG, Koblach, Austria). Two prosthodontists, who were blinded to the study groups, evaluated the restorations. In cases of widely different scores, the observers re-evaluated the restorations and reached a consensus. Restorations were evaluated at the end of 1 week (base line), 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, using modified Ryge's criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi- square' test, 'Fisher's exact' test and 'z' test. RESULTS: 90% of the BioHPP PEEK inlays were rated satisfactory in comparison to 95% of zirconia inlays. Sensitivity score was 10% in BioHPP PEEK inlays and 15% in zirconia inlays. No significant difference was encountered with other parameters in this study. CONCLUSION: The BioHPP PEEK when used as indirect aesthetic restorations was found to be satisfactory with relatively low rate of fracture over an observation period of one year in comparison to zirconia inlays in posterior teeth. The BioHPP PEEK can be a suitable alternative with high level of accuracy in terms of retention, marginal quality and aesthetics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8425372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84253722022-07-01 Comparative prospective clinical evaluation of computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing milled BioHPP PEEK inlays and Zirconia inlays Rajamani, Vijaya Kumar Reyal, Sandeep Singh Gowda, Eraiah Mahesh Shashidhar, Muttige Parameshwara J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIM: The aim of the present study was to clinically assess the performance of BioHPP PEEK material when used for inlay restoration and to compare it with widely used zirconia inlays. This clinical study was undertaken to evaluate their performance in terms of retention, colour matching, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, surface texture, wear-anatomic form, postoperative sensitivity and fracture resistance using the modified Ryge's criteria. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vivo - prospective clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria requiring inlays. The patients were further divided in two groups: Group A - Consisted of 20 permanent maxillary and mandibular carious posterior teeth restored with BioHPP PEEK inlays and Group B - Consisted of 20 permanent maxillary and mandibular carious posterior teeth restored with CAD/CAM zirconia inlays (sintered monolithic zirconia, Zolid, Amann Girrbach AG, Koblach, Austria). Two prosthodontists, who were blinded to the study groups, evaluated the restorations. In cases of widely different scores, the observers re-evaluated the restorations and reached a consensus. Restorations were evaluated at the end of 1 week (base line), 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, using modified Ryge's criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi- square' test, 'Fisher's exact' test and 'z' test. RESULTS: 90% of the BioHPP PEEK inlays were rated satisfactory in comparison to 95% of zirconia inlays. Sensitivity score was 10% in BioHPP PEEK inlays and 15% in zirconia inlays. No significant difference was encountered with other parameters in this study. CONCLUSION: The BioHPP PEEK when used as indirect aesthetic restorations was found to be satisfactory with relatively low rate of fracture over an observation period of one year in comparison to zirconia inlays in posterior teeth. The BioHPP PEEK can be a suitable alternative with high level of accuracy in terms of retention, marginal quality and aesthetics. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8425372/ /pubmed/34380810 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_57_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rajamani, Vijaya Kumar Reyal, Sandeep Singh Gowda, Eraiah Mahesh Shashidhar, Muttige Parameshwara Comparative prospective clinical evaluation of computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing milled BioHPP PEEK inlays and Zirconia inlays |
title | Comparative prospective clinical evaluation of computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing milled BioHPP PEEK inlays and Zirconia inlays |
title_full | Comparative prospective clinical evaluation of computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing milled BioHPP PEEK inlays and Zirconia inlays |
title_fullStr | Comparative prospective clinical evaluation of computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing milled BioHPP PEEK inlays and Zirconia inlays |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative prospective clinical evaluation of computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing milled BioHPP PEEK inlays and Zirconia inlays |
title_short | Comparative prospective clinical evaluation of computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing milled BioHPP PEEK inlays and Zirconia inlays |
title_sort | comparative prospective clinical evaluation of computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing milled biohpp peek inlays and zirconia inlays |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380810 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_57_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajamanivijayakumar comparativeprospectiveclinicalevaluationofcomputeraideddesigncomputeraidedmanufacturingmilledbiohpppeekinlaysandzirconiainlays AT reyalsandeepsingh comparativeprospectiveclinicalevaluationofcomputeraideddesigncomputeraidedmanufacturingmilledbiohpppeekinlaysandzirconiainlays AT gowdaeraiahmahesh comparativeprospectiveclinicalevaluationofcomputeraideddesigncomputeraidedmanufacturingmilledbiohpppeekinlaysandzirconiainlays AT shashidharmuttigeparameshwara comparativeprospectiveclinicalevaluationofcomputeraideddesigncomputeraidedmanufacturingmilledbiohpppeekinlaysandzirconiainlays |