Cargando…

Validity and reliability of tooth color selection by smartphone photography and software applications

AIM: This study assessed the validity and reliability of color selection by smartphone photography using two smartphone applications and Adobe Photoshop software. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vitro comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The validity and reliability of dental tooth shade recognition (D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammadi, Abolghasem, Bakhtiari, Zeinab, Mighani, Fatemeh, Bakhtiari, Fatemeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380816
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_193_21
_version_ 1783749839734964224
author Mohammadi, Abolghasem
Bakhtiari, Zeinab
Mighani, Fatemeh
Bakhtiari, Fatemeh
author_facet Mohammadi, Abolghasem
Bakhtiari, Zeinab
Mighani, Fatemeh
Bakhtiari, Fatemeh
author_sort Mohammadi, Abolghasem
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study assessed the validity and reliability of color selection by smartphone photography using two smartphone applications and Adobe Photoshop software. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vitro comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The validity and reliability of dental tooth shade recognition (DTSR), Chromatcher, and Adobe Photoshop were evaluated for color selection of shade tabs. The iPhone 7 camera in automatic mode was used for photography. Images were captured using Smile Lite with/without polarized filter and with camera flash. To assess the reliability, nine Vita Lumin Vacuum shade tabs were chosen and each was photographed for 10 times using Smile Lite. The reliability of DTSR, Chromatcher, and Photoshop in shade-taking was calculated. To assess their validity, 16 shade tabs of Vita Lumin Vacuum and 26 shade tabs of Vita 3D Master were photographed using the aforementioned lighting conditions. The color of photographs was calibrated and shade-taking was performed and compared with the shade suggested by SpectroShade as reference. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were analyzed using Two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc test. RESULTS: The reliability of Photoshop, DTSR, and Chromatcher was 98.88%, 63.3%, and 100%, respectively. The validity of Photoshop was significantly higher than other software programs (P < 0.05). Chromatcher had higher validity than DTSR (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Shade-taking by calibrated smartphone pictures and Adobe Photoshop has high validity and reliability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8425373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84253732022-07-01 Validity and reliability of tooth color selection by smartphone photography and software applications Mohammadi, Abolghasem Bakhtiari, Zeinab Mighani, Fatemeh Bakhtiari, Fatemeh J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIM: This study assessed the validity and reliability of color selection by smartphone photography using two smartphone applications and Adobe Photoshop software. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vitro comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The validity and reliability of dental tooth shade recognition (DTSR), Chromatcher, and Adobe Photoshop were evaluated for color selection of shade tabs. The iPhone 7 camera in automatic mode was used for photography. Images were captured using Smile Lite with/without polarized filter and with camera flash. To assess the reliability, nine Vita Lumin Vacuum shade tabs were chosen and each was photographed for 10 times using Smile Lite. The reliability of DTSR, Chromatcher, and Photoshop in shade-taking was calculated. To assess their validity, 16 shade tabs of Vita Lumin Vacuum and 26 shade tabs of Vita 3D Master were photographed using the aforementioned lighting conditions. The color of photographs was calibrated and shade-taking was performed and compared with the shade suggested by SpectroShade as reference. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were analyzed using Two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc test. RESULTS: The reliability of Photoshop, DTSR, and Chromatcher was 98.88%, 63.3%, and 100%, respectively. The validity of Photoshop was significantly higher than other software programs (P < 0.05). Chromatcher had higher validity than DTSR (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Shade-taking by calibrated smartphone pictures and Adobe Photoshop has high validity and reliability. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8425373/ /pubmed/34380816 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_193_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohammadi, Abolghasem
Bakhtiari, Zeinab
Mighani, Fatemeh
Bakhtiari, Fatemeh
Validity and reliability of tooth color selection by smartphone photography and software applications
title Validity and reliability of tooth color selection by smartphone photography and software applications
title_full Validity and reliability of tooth color selection by smartphone photography and software applications
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of tooth color selection by smartphone photography and software applications
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of tooth color selection by smartphone photography and software applications
title_short Validity and reliability of tooth color selection by smartphone photography and software applications
title_sort validity and reliability of tooth color selection by smartphone photography and software applications
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380816
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_193_21
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadiabolghasem validityandreliabilityoftoothcolorselectionbysmartphonephotographyandsoftwareapplications
AT bakhtiarizeinab validityandreliabilityoftoothcolorselectionbysmartphonephotographyandsoftwareapplications
AT mighanifatemeh validityandreliabilityoftoothcolorselectionbysmartphonephotographyandsoftwareapplications
AT bakhtiarifatemeh validityandreliabilityoftoothcolorselectionbysmartphonephotographyandsoftwareapplications