Cargando…

PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview

BACKGROUND: A large number of protocols for Systematic Reviews (SR) of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). This study aimed to analyze the innovativeness and rigoro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Haiyin, Ji, Zhaochen, Feng, Chaonan, Pang, Wentai, Chen, Zhe, Zhang, Junhua, Wang, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100774
_version_ 1783749880870600704
author Hu, Haiyin
Ji, Zhaochen
Feng, Chaonan
Pang, Wentai
Chen, Zhe
Zhang, Junhua
Wang, Hui
author_facet Hu, Haiyin
Ji, Zhaochen
Feng, Chaonan
Pang, Wentai
Chen, Zhe
Zhang, Junhua
Wang, Hui
author_sort Hu, Haiyin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A large number of protocols for Systematic Reviews (SR) of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). This study aimed to analyze the innovativeness and rigorousness of the SR protocols and make recommendations for the design and implementation of future SRs on TCM for COVID-19. This effort is likely to enhance the value of the produced information and prevent the futility of the research. METHODS: PROSPERO was searched comprehensively for identifying SRs of TCM for COVID-19 from the inception of the database to August 2020. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and cross-checked the retrieved information for consistency. The following details were recorded: database, registration time, organizations, types of research included, participants, interventions, and outcome measures. All extracted data were analyzed by an overview. The “P - participants, I - interventions, C - controls, and O - outcomes (PICO)” included in the protocols were compared for similarity. The outcomes of the included SR protocols were compared with the newly published Core Outcome Sets (COSs). RESULTS: A total of 80 protocols of SR related to TCM for COVID-19 were obtained after a primary search, and finally 71 protocols were included. The majority of the protocols were from China. Thirty-two organizations participated in the protocol registrations, including 11 hospitals and 21 universities/colleges. However, some protocols were not innovative or rigorous enough, as the PICO of some protocols were similar and non-specific, and the searched literature was incomprehensive. In addition, COS is not commonly adopted. CONCLUSIONS: Registering a protocol of SR is an effective way to ensure the usefulness of the produced information, and to avoid the duplication of research and the wastage of resources. In future SR protocols, it is important to focus on and solve the methodological problems such as non-specific PICO, incomprehensive literature retrieval, and improper outcome measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8425636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84256362021-09-09 PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview Hu, Haiyin Ji, Zhaochen Feng, Chaonan Pang, Wentai Chen, Zhe Zhang, Junhua Wang, Hui Integr Med Res Review Article BACKGROUND: A large number of protocols for Systematic Reviews (SR) of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). This study aimed to analyze the innovativeness and rigorousness of the SR protocols and make recommendations for the design and implementation of future SRs on TCM for COVID-19. This effort is likely to enhance the value of the produced information and prevent the futility of the research. METHODS: PROSPERO was searched comprehensively for identifying SRs of TCM for COVID-19 from the inception of the database to August 2020. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and cross-checked the retrieved information for consistency. The following details were recorded: database, registration time, organizations, types of research included, participants, interventions, and outcome measures. All extracted data were analyzed by an overview. The “P - participants, I - interventions, C - controls, and O - outcomes (PICO)” included in the protocols were compared for similarity. The outcomes of the included SR protocols were compared with the newly published Core Outcome Sets (COSs). RESULTS: A total of 80 protocols of SR related to TCM for COVID-19 were obtained after a primary search, and finally 71 protocols were included. The majority of the protocols were from China. Thirty-two organizations participated in the protocol registrations, including 11 hospitals and 21 universities/colleges. However, some protocols were not innovative or rigorous enough, as the PICO of some protocols were similar and non-specific, and the searched literature was incomprehensive. In addition, COS is not commonly adopted. CONCLUSIONS: Registering a protocol of SR is an effective way to ensure the usefulness of the produced information, and to avoid the duplication of research and the wastage of resources. In future SR protocols, it is important to focus on and solve the methodological problems such as non-specific PICO, incomprehensive literature retrieval, and improper outcome measures. Elsevier 2021 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8425636/ /pubmed/34518798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100774 Text en © 2021 Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Hu, Haiyin
Ji, Zhaochen
Feng, Chaonan
Pang, Wentai
Chen, Zhe
Zhang, Junhua
Wang, Hui
PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
title PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
title_full PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
title_fullStr PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
title_full_unstemmed PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
title_short PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
title_sort prospero's systematic review protocols of traditional chinese medicine for covid-19: an overview
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100774
work_keys_str_mv AT huhaiyin prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT jizhaochen prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT fengchaonan prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT pangwentai prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT chenzhe prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT zhangjunhua prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT wanghui prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview