Cargando…

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies

Patients with infection can develop sepsis, and their mortality can be high. An important aspect in the treatment of sepsis is adequate management of the infection. DATA SOURCES: Using a modified Delphi approach, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign research committee recently published a series of 26 prio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin-Loeches, Ignacio, Nunnally, Mark E., Hellman, Judith, Lat, Ishaq, Martin, Greg S., Jog, Sameer, Kesecioglu, Jozef, De Backer, Daniel, Coopersmith, Craig M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000511
_version_ 1783749920291815424
author Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
Nunnally, Mark E.
Hellman, Judith
Lat, Ishaq
Martin, Greg S.
Jog, Sameer
Kesecioglu, Jozef
De Backer, Daniel
Coopersmith, Craig M.
author_facet Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
Nunnally, Mark E.
Hellman, Judith
Lat, Ishaq
Martin, Greg S.
Jog, Sameer
Kesecioglu, Jozef
De Backer, Daniel
Coopersmith, Craig M.
author_sort Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
collection PubMed
description Patients with infection can develop sepsis, and their mortality can be high. An important aspect in the treatment of sepsis is adequate management of the infection. DATA SOURCES: Using a modified Delphi approach, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign research committee recently published a series of 26 priorities for sepsis and septic shock. STUDY SELECTION: Task force members with specific expertise were tasked with generating expanded reviews for all infection questions and a subset of adjunctive therapy questions from the larger list of sepsis priorities. Each question was addressed by one of the six task force members. DATA EXTRACTION: In-depth reviews were then edited by the group as a whole, with added input from the committee cochairs. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six questions were addressed: 1) should empiric antibiotic combination therapy be used in sepsis or septic shock? 2) does optimization of antimicrobial pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics impact patient outcomes in sepsis? 3) should viral reactivation resulting from sepsis-induced immunosuppression be treated with antiviral therapy in critically ill septic patients? 4) should rapid diagnostic tests be implemented in clinical practice? 5) what is the role of lung-protective ventilation in sepsis patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome? and 6) how do we determine the efficacy of “blood purification” therapies such as endotoxin absorbers, cytokine absorbers, and plasmapheresis. CONCLUSIONS: The research committee members for the Surviving Sepsis Campaign aimed to explore research questions in order to provide existing evidence and highlight areas of uncertainty and future directions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8425836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84258362021-09-10 Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies Martin-Loeches, Ignacio Nunnally, Mark E. Hellman, Judith Lat, Ishaq Martin, Greg S. Jog, Sameer Kesecioglu, Jozef De Backer, Daniel Coopersmith, Craig M. Crit Care Explor Review Article Patients with infection can develop sepsis, and their mortality can be high. An important aspect in the treatment of sepsis is adequate management of the infection. DATA SOURCES: Using a modified Delphi approach, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign research committee recently published a series of 26 priorities for sepsis and septic shock. STUDY SELECTION: Task force members with specific expertise were tasked with generating expanded reviews for all infection questions and a subset of adjunctive therapy questions from the larger list of sepsis priorities. Each question was addressed by one of the six task force members. DATA EXTRACTION: In-depth reviews were then edited by the group as a whole, with added input from the committee cochairs. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six questions were addressed: 1) should empiric antibiotic combination therapy be used in sepsis or septic shock? 2) does optimization of antimicrobial pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics impact patient outcomes in sepsis? 3) should viral reactivation resulting from sepsis-induced immunosuppression be treated with antiviral therapy in critically ill septic patients? 4) should rapid diagnostic tests be implemented in clinical practice? 5) what is the role of lung-protective ventilation in sepsis patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome? and 6) how do we determine the efficacy of “blood purification” therapies such as endotoxin absorbers, cytokine absorbers, and plasmapheresis. CONCLUSIONS: The research committee members for the Surviving Sepsis Campaign aimed to explore research questions in order to provide existing evidence and highlight areas of uncertainty and future directions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8425836/ /pubmed/34514420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000511 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Review Article
Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
Nunnally, Mark E.
Hellman, Judith
Lat, Ishaq
Martin, Greg S.
Jog, Sameer
Kesecioglu, Jozef
De Backer, Daniel
Coopersmith, Craig M.
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies
title Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies
title_full Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies
title_fullStr Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies
title_full_unstemmed Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies
title_short Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies
title_sort surviving sepsis campaign: research opportunities for infection and blood purification therapies
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000511
work_keys_str_mv AT martinloechesignacio survivingsepsiscampaignresearchopportunitiesforinfectionandbloodpurificationtherapies
AT nunnallymarke survivingsepsiscampaignresearchopportunitiesforinfectionandbloodpurificationtherapies
AT hellmanjudith survivingsepsiscampaignresearchopportunitiesforinfectionandbloodpurificationtherapies
AT latishaq survivingsepsiscampaignresearchopportunitiesforinfectionandbloodpurificationtherapies
AT martingregs survivingsepsiscampaignresearchopportunitiesforinfectionandbloodpurificationtherapies
AT jogsameer survivingsepsiscampaignresearchopportunitiesforinfectionandbloodpurificationtherapies
AT kesecioglujozef survivingsepsiscampaignresearchopportunitiesforinfectionandbloodpurificationtherapies
AT debackerdaniel survivingsepsiscampaignresearchopportunitiesforinfectionandbloodpurificationtherapies
AT coopersmithcraigm survivingsepsiscampaignresearchopportunitiesforinfectionandbloodpurificationtherapies