Cargando…

Implementation of a real‐time, ultrasound‐guided prostate HDR brachytherapy program

This work presents a comprehensive commissioning and workflow development process of a real‐time, ultrasound (US) image‐guided treatment planning system (TPS), a stepper and a US unit. To adequately benchmark the system, commissioning tasks were separated into (1) US imaging, (2) stepper mechanical,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Blake R., Strand, Sarah A., Dunkerley, David, Flynn, Ryan T., Besemer, Abigail E., Kos, Jennifer D., Caster, Joseph M., Wagner, Bonnie S., Kim, Yusung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34312999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13363
_version_ 1783749939833077760
author Smith, Blake R.
Strand, Sarah A.
Dunkerley, David
Flynn, Ryan T.
Besemer, Abigail E.
Kos, Jennifer D.
Caster, Joseph M.
Wagner, Bonnie S.
Kim, Yusung
author_facet Smith, Blake R.
Strand, Sarah A.
Dunkerley, David
Flynn, Ryan T.
Besemer, Abigail E.
Kos, Jennifer D.
Caster, Joseph M.
Wagner, Bonnie S.
Kim, Yusung
author_sort Smith, Blake R.
collection PubMed
description This work presents a comprehensive commissioning and workflow development process of a real‐time, ultrasound (US) image‐guided treatment planning system (TPS), a stepper and a US unit. To adequately benchmark the system, commissioning tasks were separated into (1) US imaging, (2) stepper mechanical, and (3) treatment planning aspects. Quality assurance US imaging measurements were performed following the AAPM TG‐128 and GEC‐ESTRO recommendations and consisted of benchmarking the spatial resolution, accuracy, and low‐contrast detectability. Mechanical tests were first used to benchmark the electronic encoders within the stepper and were later expanded to evaluate the needle free length calculation accuracy. Needle reconstruction accuracy was rigorously evaluated at the treatment planning level. The calibration length of each probe was redundantly checked between the calculated and measured needle free length, which was found to be within 1 mm for a variety of scenarios. Needle placement relative to a reference fiducial and coincidence of imaging coordinate origins were verified to within 1 mm in both sagittal and transverse imaging planes. The source strength was also calibrated within the interstitial needle and was found to be 1.14% lower than when measured in a plastic needle. Dose calculations in the TPS and secondary dose calculation software were benchmarked against manual TG‐43 calculations. Calculations among the three calculation methods agreed within 1% for all calculated points. Source positioning and dummy coincidence was tested following the recommendations of the TG‐40 report. Finally, the development of the clinical workflow, checklists, and planning objectives are discussed and included within this report. The commissioning of real‐time, US‐guided HDR prostate systems requires careful consideration among several facets including the image quality, dosimetric, and mechanical accuracy. The TPS relies on each of these components to develop and administer a treatment plan, and as such, should be carefully examined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8425918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84259182021-09-13 Implementation of a real‐time, ultrasound‐guided prostate HDR brachytherapy program Smith, Blake R. Strand, Sarah A. Dunkerley, David Flynn, Ryan T. Besemer, Abigail E. Kos, Jennifer D. Caster, Joseph M. Wagner, Bonnie S. Kim, Yusung J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This work presents a comprehensive commissioning and workflow development process of a real‐time, ultrasound (US) image‐guided treatment planning system (TPS), a stepper and a US unit. To adequately benchmark the system, commissioning tasks were separated into (1) US imaging, (2) stepper mechanical, and (3) treatment planning aspects. Quality assurance US imaging measurements were performed following the AAPM TG‐128 and GEC‐ESTRO recommendations and consisted of benchmarking the spatial resolution, accuracy, and low‐contrast detectability. Mechanical tests were first used to benchmark the electronic encoders within the stepper and were later expanded to evaluate the needle free length calculation accuracy. Needle reconstruction accuracy was rigorously evaluated at the treatment planning level. The calibration length of each probe was redundantly checked between the calculated and measured needle free length, which was found to be within 1 mm for a variety of scenarios. Needle placement relative to a reference fiducial and coincidence of imaging coordinate origins were verified to within 1 mm in both sagittal and transverse imaging planes. The source strength was also calibrated within the interstitial needle and was found to be 1.14% lower than when measured in a plastic needle. Dose calculations in the TPS and secondary dose calculation software were benchmarked against manual TG‐43 calculations. Calculations among the three calculation methods agreed within 1% for all calculated points. Source positioning and dummy coincidence was tested following the recommendations of the TG‐40 report. Finally, the development of the clinical workflow, checklists, and planning objectives are discussed and included within this report. The commissioning of real‐time, US‐guided HDR prostate systems requires careful consideration among several facets including the image quality, dosimetric, and mechanical accuracy. The TPS relies on each of these components to develop and administer a treatment plan, and as such, should be carefully examined. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8425918/ /pubmed/34312999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13363 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Smith, Blake R.
Strand, Sarah A.
Dunkerley, David
Flynn, Ryan T.
Besemer, Abigail E.
Kos, Jennifer D.
Caster, Joseph M.
Wagner, Bonnie S.
Kim, Yusung
Implementation of a real‐time, ultrasound‐guided prostate HDR brachytherapy program
title Implementation of a real‐time, ultrasound‐guided prostate HDR brachytherapy program
title_full Implementation of a real‐time, ultrasound‐guided prostate HDR brachytherapy program
title_fullStr Implementation of a real‐time, ultrasound‐guided prostate HDR brachytherapy program
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a real‐time, ultrasound‐guided prostate HDR brachytherapy program
title_short Implementation of a real‐time, ultrasound‐guided prostate HDR brachytherapy program
title_sort implementation of a real‐time, ultrasound‐guided prostate hdr brachytherapy program
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34312999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13363
work_keys_str_mv AT smithblaker implementationofarealtimeultrasoundguidedprostatehdrbrachytherapyprogram
AT strandsaraha implementationofarealtimeultrasoundguidedprostatehdrbrachytherapyprogram
AT dunkerleydavid implementationofarealtimeultrasoundguidedprostatehdrbrachytherapyprogram
AT flynnryant implementationofarealtimeultrasoundguidedprostatehdrbrachytherapyprogram
AT besemerabigaile implementationofarealtimeultrasoundguidedprostatehdrbrachytherapyprogram
AT kosjenniferd implementationofarealtimeultrasoundguidedprostatehdrbrachytherapyprogram
AT casterjosephm implementationofarealtimeultrasoundguidedprostatehdrbrachytherapyprogram
AT wagnerbonnies implementationofarealtimeultrasoundguidedprostatehdrbrachytherapyprogram
AT kimyusung implementationofarealtimeultrasoundguidedprostatehdrbrachytherapyprogram