Cargando…

Radiation dose for 320‐row dose‐modulated dynamic coronary CT angiography

OBJECTIVES: The area detector 320‐row CT scanner, which can cover the whole heart in one rotation, can aid in reducing radiation exposure during electrocardiography (ECG)‐gated coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Recently, researchers have proposed dose‐modulated dynamic CCTA with a 320‐row scanner for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Izoe, Yukako, Nagao, Michinobu, Tokai, Mei, Hashimoto, Hiroyuki, Tanaka, Isao, Chida, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34375023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13390
_version_ 1783749942651650048
author Izoe, Yukako
Nagao, Michinobu
Tokai, Mei
Hashimoto, Hiroyuki
Tanaka, Isao
Chida, Koichi
author_facet Izoe, Yukako
Nagao, Michinobu
Tokai, Mei
Hashimoto, Hiroyuki
Tanaka, Isao
Chida, Koichi
author_sort Izoe, Yukako
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The area detector 320‐row CT scanner, which can cover the whole heart in one rotation, can aid in reducing radiation exposure during electrocardiography (ECG)‐gated coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Recently, researchers have proposed dose‐modulated dynamic CCTA with a 320‐row scanner for the detection of functional myocardial ischemia. In the present study, we compared and validated the radiation dose of this method with that of the standard CCTA method and the latest diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included a total of 164 consecutive patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent CCTA with a 320‐row scanner. The patients were randomly divided into dynamic and standard CCTA groups, and the CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) calculated by the CT system were compared between the two protocols and with the latest DRL. RESULTS: Standard and dynamic CCTA scans were performed in 77 and 87 patients, respectively. CTDIvol was significantly higher for standard CCTA than for dynamic CCTA (41 ± 35 mGy vs. 22 ± 7 mGy, p = 0.0014). DLP was also significantly higher for standard CCTA than for dynamic CCTA (864 ± 702 mGy × cm vs. 434 ± 106 mGy × cm, p < .0001). For standard scans, CTDIvol and DLP exceeded the 2020 DRL in Japan in 16% (12/77) and 17% (13/77) of cases, respectively. In contrast, rates for the dynamic scan were only 1% (1/87) for CTDIvol and 0% (0/87) for DLP. CONCLUSION: The dose of radiation exposure during dynamic CCTA with a 320‐row scanner does not exceed that of standard CCTA and is sufficient to meet the latest DRL. Thus, our results suggest that the method is safe from the perspective of radiation exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8425931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84259312021-09-13 Radiation dose for 320‐row dose‐modulated dynamic coronary CT angiography Izoe, Yukako Nagao, Michinobu Tokai, Mei Hashimoto, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Isao Chida, Koichi J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging OBJECTIVES: The area detector 320‐row CT scanner, which can cover the whole heart in one rotation, can aid in reducing radiation exposure during electrocardiography (ECG)‐gated coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Recently, researchers have proposed dose‐modulated dynamic CCTA with a 320‐row scanner for the detection of functional myocardial ischemia. In the present study, we compared and validated the radiation dose of this method with that of the standard CCTA method and the latest diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included a total of 164 consecutive patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent CCTA with a 320‐row scanner. The patients were randomly divided into dynamic and standard CCTA groups, and the CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) calculated by the CT system were compared between the two protocols and with the latest DRL. RESULTS: Standard and dynamic CCTA scans were performed in 77 and 87 patients, respectively. CTDIvol was significantly higher for standard CCTA than for dynamic CCTA (41 ± 35 mGy vs. 22 ± 7 mGy, p = 0.0014). DLP was also significantly higher for standard CCTA than for dynamic CCTA (864 ± 702 mGy × cm vs. 434 ± 106 mGy × cm, p < .0001). For standard scans, CTDIvol and DLP exceeded the 2020 DRL in Japan in 16% (12/77) and 17% (13/77) of cases, respectively. In contrast, rates for the dynamic scan were only 1% (1/87) for CTDIvol and 0% (0/87) for DLP. CONCLUSION: The dose of radiation exposure during dynamic CCTA with a 320‐row scanner does not exceed that of standard CCTA and is sufficient to meet the latest DRL. Thus, our results suggest that the method is safe from the perspective of radiation exposure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8425931/ /pubmed/34375023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13390 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Izoe, Yukako
Nagao, Michinobu
Tokai, Mei
Hashimoto, Hiroyuki
Tanaka, Isao
Chida, Koichi
Radiation dose for 320‐row dose‐modulated dynamic coronary CT angiography
title Radiation dose for 320‐row dose‐modulated dynamic coronary CT angiography
title_full Radiation dose for 320‐row dose‐modulated dynamic coronary CT angiography
title_fullStr Radiation dose for 320‐row dose‐modulated dynamic coronary CT angiography
title_full_unstemmed Radiation dose for 320‐row dose‐modulated dynamic coronary CT angiography
title_short Radiation dose for 320‐row dose‐modulated dynamic coronary CT angiography
title_sort radiation dose for 320‐row dose‐modulated dynamic coronary ct angiography
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34375023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13390
work_keys_str_mv AT izoeyukako radiationdosefor320rowdosemodulateddynamiccoronaryctangiography
AT nagaomichinobu radiationdosefor320rowdosemodulateddynamiccoronaryctangiography
AT tokaimei radiationdosefor320rowdosemodulateddynamiccoronaryctangiography
AT hashimotohiroyuki radiationdosefor320rowdosemodulateddynamiccoronaryctangiography
AT tanakaisao radiationdosefor320rowdosemodulateddynamiccoronaryctangiography
AT chidakoichi radiationdosefor320rowdosemodulateddynamiccoronaryctangiography