Cargando…

Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of changing the scan mode of the Elekta X‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the accuracy of dose calculation, which may be affected by computed tomography (CT) value errors in three dimensions. METHODS: We used the electron density phantom an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taniguchi, Takuya, Hara, Takanori, Shimozato, Tomohiro, Hyodo, Fuminori, Ono, Kose, Nakaya, Shuto, Noda, Yoshifumi, Kato, Hiroki, Tanaka, Osamu, Matsuo, Masayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34375008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13384
_version_ 1783749944328323072
author Taniguchi, Takuya
Hara, Takanori
Shimozato, Tomohiro
Hyodo, Fuminori
Ono, Kose
Nakaya, Shuto
Noda, Yoshifumi
Kato, Hiroki
Tanaka, Osamu
Matsuo, Masayuki
author_facet Taniguchi, Takuya
Hara, Takanori
Shimozato, Tomohiro
Hyodo, Fuminori
Ono, Kose
Nakaya, Shuto
Noda, Yoshifumi
Kato, Hiroki
Tanaka, Osamu
Matsuo, Masayuki
author_sort Taniguchi, Takuya
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of changing the scan mode of the Elekta X‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the accuracy of dose calculation, which may be affected by computed tomography (CT) value errors in three dimensions. METHODS: We used the electron density phantom and measured the CT values in three dimensions. CT values were compared with planning computed tomography (pCT) values for various materials. The evaluated scan modes were for head and neck (S‐scan), chest (M‐scan), and pelvis (L‐scan) with various collimators and filter systems. To evaluate the effects of the CT value error of the CBCT on dose error, Monte Carlo calculations of dosimetry were performed using pCT and CBCT images. RESULTS: The L‐scan had a CT value error of approximately 800 HU at the isocenter compared with the pCT. Furthermore, inhomogeneity in the longitudinal CT value profile was observed in the bone material. The dose error for ±100 HU difference in CT values for the S‐scan and M‐scan was within ±2%. The center of the L‐scan had a CT error of approximately 800 HU and a dose error of approximately 6%. The dose error of the L‐scan occurred in the beam path in the case of both single field and two parallel opposed fields, and the maximum error occurred at the center of the phantom in the case of both the 4‐field box and single‐arc techniques. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the three‐dimensional CT value characteristics of the CBCT by evaluating the CT value error obtained under various imaging conditions. It was found that the L‐scan is considerably affected by not having a unique bowtie filter, and the S‐scan without the bowtie filter causes CT value errors in the longitudinal direction. Moreover, the CBCT dose errors for the 4‐field box and single‐arc irradiation techniques converge to the isocenter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8425939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84259392021-09-13 Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography Taniguchi, Takuya Hara, Takanori Shimozato, Tomohiro Hyodo, Fuminori Ono, Kose Nakaya, Shuto Noda, Yoshifumi Kato, Hiroki Tanaka, Osamu Matsuo, Masayuki J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of changing the scan mode of the Elekta X‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the accuracy of dose calculation, which may be affected by computed tomography (CT) value errors in three dimensions. METHODS: We used the electron density phantom and measured the CT values in three dimensions. CT values were compared with planning computed tomography (pCT) values for various materials. The evaluated scan modes were for head and neck (S‐scan), chest (M‐scan), and pelvis (L‐scan) with various collimators and filter systems. To evaluate the effects of the CT value error of the CBCT on dose error, Monte Carlo calculations of dosimetry were performed using pCT and CBCT images. RESULTS: The L‐scan had a CT value error of approximately 800 HU at the isocenter compared with the pCT. Furthermore, inhomogeneity in the longitudinal CT value profile was observed in the bone material. The dose error for ±100 HU difference in CT values for the S‐scan and M‐scan was within ±2%. The center of the L‐scan had a CT error of approximately 800 HU and a dose error of approximately 6%. The dose error of the L‐scan occurred in the beam path in the case of both single field and two parallel opposed fields, and the maximum error occurred at the center of the phantom in the case of both the 4‐field box and single‐arc techniques. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the three‐dimensional CT value characteristics of the CBCT by evaluating the CT value error obtained under various imaging conditions. It was found that the L‐scan is considerably affected by not having a unique bowtie filter, and the S‐scan without the bowtie filter causes CT value errors in the longitudinal direction. Moreover, the CBCT dose errors for the 4‐field box and single‐arc irradiation techniques converge to the isocenter. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8425939/ /pubmed/34375008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13384 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Taniguchi, Takuya
Hara, Takanori
Shimozato, Tomohiro
Hyodo, Fuminori
Ono, Kose
Nakaya, Shuto
Noda, Yoshifumi
Kato, Hiroki
Tanaka, Osamu
Matsuo, Masayuki
Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography
title Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography
title_full Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography
title_fullStr Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography
title_short Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography
title_sort effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with elekta x‐ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34375008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13384
work_keys_str_mv AT taniguchitakuya effectofcomputedtomographyvalueerrorondosecalculationinadaptiveradiotherapywithelektaxrayvolumeimagingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT haratakanori effectofcomputedtomographyvalueerrorondosecalculationinadaptiveradiotherapywithelektaxrayvolumeimagingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT shimozatotomohiro effectofcomputedtomographyvalueerrorondosecalculationinadaptiveradiotherapywithelektaxrayvolumeimagingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT hyodofuminori effectofcomputedtomographyvalueerrorondosecalculationinadaptiveradiotherapywithelektaxrayvolumeimagingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT onokose effectofcomputedtomographyvalueerrorondosecalculationinadaptiveradiotherapywithelektaxrayvolumeimagingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT nakayashuto effectofcomputedtomographyvalueerrorondosecalculationinadaptiveradiotherapywithelektaxrayvolumeimagingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT nodayoshifumi effectofcomputedtomographyvalueerrorondosecalculationinadaptiveradiotherapywithelektaxrayvolumeimagingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT katohiroki effectofcomputedtomographyvalueerrorondosecalculationinadaptiveradiotherapywithelektaxrayvolumeimagingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT tanakaosamu effectofcomputedtomographyvalueerrorondosecalculationinadaptiveradiotherapywithelektaxrayvolumeimagingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT matsuomasayuki effectofcomputedtomographyvalueerrorondosecalculationinadaptiveradiotherapywithelektaxrayvolumeimagingconebeamcomputedtomography