Cargando…

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Therapies for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: There is significant controversy relating to whether chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) can be treated with pulmonary arterial hypertension- (PAH-) targeted therapies and which therapy is the optimal choice for patients. A large number of randomized controlled trials (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yusi, Li, Fang, Luo, Jun, Chen, Jingyuan, Luo, Peng, Li, Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1626971
_version_ 1783749968741269504
author Chen, Yusi
Li, Fang
Luo, Jun
Chen, Jingyuan
Luo, Peng
Li, Jiang
author_facet Chen, Yusi
Li, Fang
Luo, Jun
Chen, Jingyuan
Luo, Peng
Li, Jiang
author_sort Chen, Yusi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is significant controversy relating to whether chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) can be treated with pulmonary arterial hypertension- (PAH-) targeted therapies and which therapy is the optimal choice for patients. A large number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared PAH-targeted therapies with placebo or conventional therapies. In this study, we aimed to compare all of the PAH-targeted medications that are used to treat CTEPH and rank their efficacy by the application of network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register, https://clinicaltrials.gov, and who.int/trialsearch/, for relevant RCTs published up to January 2020. In addition to traditional meta-analysis, we also performed NMA in our systematic review, as deployed in a previous protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42020173765). RESULTS: Our study identified eight eligible RCTs that evaluated seven PAH-targeted therapies in 703 patients with CTEPH. NMA revealed that riociguat was ranked first as the most optimized therapy for ameliorating the 6-minute walk distance with a probability of 80.4%. Bosentan was significantly better than others with regard to reducing brain natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide with a probability of 84.3%. Sildenafil was identified as the best drug in terms of improving the New York Heart Association/World Health Organization functional class with a probability of 87.3%. Treprostinil and macitentan were more beneficial than other drugs in reducing pulmonary vascular resistance and lowering the incidence of clinical worsening with probabilities of 86.2% and 79.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Analysis revealed positive advantages for the use of PAH-targeted drugs in patients with CTEPH. Overall, treprostinil and riociguat were superior to all other PAH-targeted medications in most of the outcomes investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8426079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84260792021-09-09 Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Therapies for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Chen, Yusi Li, Fang Luo, Jun Chen, Jingyuan Luo, Peng Li, Jiang Can Respir J Review Article BACKGROUND: There is significant controversy relating to whether chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) can be treated with pulmonary arterial hypertension- (PAH-) targeted therapies and which therapy is the optimal choice for patients. A large number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared PAH-targeted therapies with placebo or conventional therapies. In this study, we aimed to compare all of the PAH-targeted medications that are used to treat CTEPH and rank their efficacy by the application of network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register, https://clinicaltrials.gov, and who.int/trialsearch/, for relevant RCTs published up to January 2020. In addition to traditional meta-analysis, we also performed NMA in our systematic review, as deployed in a previous protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42020173765). RESULTS: Our study identified eight eligible RCTs that evaluated seven PAH-targeted therapies in 703 patients with CTEPH. NMA revealed that riociguat was ranked first as the most optimized therapy for ameliorating the 6-minute walk distance with a probability of 80.4%. Bosentan was significantly better than others with regard to reducing brain natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide with a probability of 84.3%. Sildenafil was identified as the best drug in terms of improving the New York Heart Association/World Health Organization functional class with a probability of 87.3%. Treprostinil and macitentan were more beneficial than other drugs in reducing pulmonary vascular resistance and lowering the incidence of clinical worsening with probabilities of 86.2% and 79.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Analysis revealed positive advantages for the use of PAH-targeted drugs in patients with CTEPH. Overall, treprostinil and riociguat were superior to all other PAH-targeted medications in most of the outcomes investigated. Hindawi 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8426079/ /pubmed/34512819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1626971 Text en Copyright © 2021 Yusi Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Chen, Yusi
Li, Fang
Luo, Jun
Chen, Jingyuan
Luo, Peng
Li, Jiang
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Therapies for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Therapies for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Therapies for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Therapies for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Therapies for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Therapies for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1626971
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyusi comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftargetedtherapiesforchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lifang comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftargetedtherapiesforchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT luojun comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftargetedtherapiesforchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenjingyuan comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftargetedtherapiesforchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT luopeng comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftargetedtherapiesforchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lijiang comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftargetedtherapiesforchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis