Cargando…

Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to provide data regarding use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in rectal cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE library, EMBASE, and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between DWI and metastatic and non-metast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Surov, Alexey, Meyer, Hans-Jonas, Pech, Maciej, Powerski, Maciej, Omari, Jasan, Wienke, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03986-8
_version_ 1783750004571111424
author Surov, Alexey
Meyer, Hans-Jonas
Pech, Maciej
Powerski, Maciej
Omari, Jasan
Wienke, Andreas
author_facet Surov, Alexey
Meyer, Hans-Jonas
Pech, Maciej
Powerski, Maciej
Omari, Jasan
Wienke, Andreas
author_sort Surov, Alexey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our aim was to provide data regarding use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in rectal cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE library, EMBASE, and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between DWI and metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer up to February 2021. Overall, 9 studies were included into the analysis. Number, mean value, and standard deviation of DWI parameters including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic and non-metastatic LN were extracted from the literature. The methodological quality of the studies was investigated according to the QUADAS-2 assessment. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian, and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used to account the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean DWI values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated for metastatic and non-metastatic LN. RESULTS: ADC values were reported for 1376 LN, 623 (45.3%) metastatic LN, and 754 (54.7%) non-metastatic LN. The calculated mean ADC value (× 10(−3) mm(2)/s) of metastatic LN was 1.05, 95%CI (0.94, 1.15). The calculated mean ADC value of the non-metastatic LN was 1.17, 95%CI (1.01, 1.33). The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 0.81, 95%CI (0.74, 0.89) and 0.67, 95%CI (0.54, 0.79). CONCLUSION: No reliable ADC threshold can be recommended for distinguishing of metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8426255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84262552021-09-09 Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis Surov, Alexey Meyer, Hans-Jonas Pech, Maciej Powerski, Maciej Omari, Jasan Wienke, Andreas Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Our aim was to provide data regarding use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in rectal cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE library, EMBASE, and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between DWI and metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer up to February 2021. Overall, 9 studies were included into the analysis. Number, mean value, and standard deviation of DWI parameters including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic and non-metastatic LN were extracted from the literature. The methodological quality of the studies was investigated according to the QUADAS-2 assessment. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian, and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used to account the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean DWI values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated for metastatic and non-metastatic LN. RESULTS: ADC values were reported for 1376 LN, 623 (45.3%) metastatic LN, and 754 (54.7%) non-metastatic LN. The calculated mean ADC value (× 10(−3) mm(2)/s) of metastatic LN was 1.05, 95%CI (0.94, 1.15). The calculated mean ADC value of the non-metastatic LN was 1.17, 95%CI (1.01, 1.33). The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 0.81, 95%CI (0.74, 0.89) and 0.67, 95%CI (0.54, 0.79). CONCLUSION: No reliable ADC threshold can be recommended for distinguishing of metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8426255/ /pubmed/34184127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03986-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Surov, Alexey
Meyer, Hans-Jonas
Pech, Maciej
Powerski, Maciej
Omari, Jasan
Wienke, Andreas
Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
title Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
title_short Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
title_sort apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03986-8
work_keys_str_mv AT surovalexey apparentdiffusioncoefficientcannotdiscriminatemetastaticandnonmetastaticlymphnodesinrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT meyerhansjonas apparentdiffusioncoefficientcannotdiscriminatemetastaticandnonmetastaticlymphnodesinrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT pechmaciej apparentdiffusioncoefficientcannotdiscriminatemetastaticandnonmetastaticlymphnodesinrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT powerskimaciej apparentdiffusioncoefficientcannotdiscriminatemetastaticandnonmetastaticlymphnodesinrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT omarijasan apparentdiffusioncoefficientcannotdiscriminatemetastaticandnonmetastaticlymphnodesinrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT wienkeandreas apparentdiffusioncoefficientcannotdiscriminatemetastaticandnonmetastaticlymphnodesinrectalcancerametaanalysis