Cargando…
Intraoperative anaphylaxis due to aprotinin after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests and basophil activation tests: a case report
BACKGROUND: There are few cases of anaphylaxis after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old woman underwent partial lung resection under general anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced uneventfully. Shortly after applying absorbable suture reinforcem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34495416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40981-021-00472-6 |
_version_ | 1783750039432069120 |
---|---|
author | Orihara, Masaki Takazawa, Tomonori Horiuchi, Tatsuo Sakamoto, Shinya Uchiyama, Mutsumi Saito, Shigeru |
author_facet | Orihara, Masaki Takazawa, Tomonori Horiuchi, Tatsuo Sakamoto, Shinya Uchiyama, Mutsumi Saito, Shigeru |
author_sort | Orihara, Masaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are few cases of anaphylaxis after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old woman underwent partial lung resection under general anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced uneventfully. Shortly after applying absorbable suture reinforcement felt that contained fibrin sealant, her systolic blood pressure fell to approximately 70 mmHg, along with facial flushing. Anaphylaxis was diagnosed based on the clinical symptoms and high serum tryptase levels. Three months after the event, skin tests were performed with all agents and were positive only for fibrin sealant vial no. 2, whose main component is aprotinin. Subsequently, basophil activation tests using fibrin sealant vial no. 2 and pure aprotinin demonstrated that the causative agent was likely aprotinin. CONCLUSIONS: We diagnosed aprotinin-induced anaphylaxis using skin tests and basophil activation tests. The occurrence of anaphylaxis should be considered when changes in vital signs are observed after the use of fibrin sealant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8426421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84264212021-09-29 Intraoperative anaphylaxis due to aprotinin after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests and basophil activation tests: a case report Orihara, Masaki Takazawa, Tomonori Horiuchi, Tatsuo Sakamoto, Shinya Uchiyama, Mutsumi Saito, Shigeru JA Clin Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: There are few cases of anaphylaxis after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old woman underwent partial lung resection under general anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced uneventfully. Shortly after applying absorbable suture reinforcement felt that contained fibrin sealant, her systolic blood pressure fell to approximately 70 mmHg, along with facial flushing. Anaphylaxis was diagnosed based on the clinical symptoms and high serum tryptase levels. Three months after the event, skin tests were performed with all agents and were positive only for fibrin sealant vial no. 2, whose main component is aprotinin. Subsequently, basophil activation tests using fibrin sealant vial no. 2 and pure aprotinin demonstrated that the causative agent was likely aprotinin. CONCLUSIONS: We diagnosed aprotinin-induced anaphylaxis using skin tests and basophil activation tests. The occurrence of anaphylaxis should be considered when changes in vital signs are observed after the use of fibrin sealant. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8426421/ /pubmed/34495416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40981-021-00472-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Case Report Orihara, Masaki Takazawa, Tomonori Horiuchi, Tatsuo Sakamoto, Shinya Uchiyama, Mutsumi Saito, Shigeru Intraoperative anaphylaxis due to aprotinin after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests and basophil activation tests: a case report |
title | Intraoperative anaphylaxis due to aprotinin after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests and basophil activation tests: a case report |
title_full | Intraoperative anaphylaxis due to aprotinin after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests and basophil activation tests: a case report |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative anaphylaxis due to aprotinin after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests and basophil activation tests: a case report |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative anaphylaxis due to aprotinin after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests and basophil activation tests: a case report |
title_short | Intraoperative anaphylaxis due to aprotinin after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests and basophil activation tests: a case report |
title_sort | intraoperative anaphylaxis due to aprotinin after local application of fibrin sealant diagnosed by skin tests and basophil activation tests: a case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34495416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40981-021-00472-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oriharamasaki intraoperativeanaphylaxisduetoaprotininafterlocalapplicationoffibrinsealantdiagnosedbyskintestsandbasophilactivationtestsacasereport AT takazawatomonori intraoperativeanaphylaxisduetoaprotininafterlocalapplicationoffibrinsealantdiagnosedbyskintestsandbasophilactivationtestsacasereport AT horiuchitatsuo intraoperativeanaphylaxisduetoaprotininafterlocalapplicationoffibrinsealantdiagnosedbyskintestsandbasophilactivationtestsacasereport AT sakamotoshinya intraoperativeanaphylaxisduetoaprotininafterlocalapplicationoffibrinsealantdiagnosedbyskintestsandbasophilactivationtestsacasereport AT uchiyamamutsumi intraoperativeanaphylaxisduetoaprotininafterlocalapplicationoffibrinsealantdiagnosedbyskintestsandbasophilactivationtestsacasereport AT saitoshigeru intraoperativeanaphylaxisduetoaprotininafterlocalapplicationoffibrinsealantdiagnosedbyskintestsandbasophilactivationtestsacasereport |