Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma: an institutional experience

Core needle biopsy (CNB) is gaining in importance due to its advantages in the matter of patient morbidity, time and cost. Nevertheless, controversies still exist regarding the biopsy technique of choice for the accurate diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). This retrospective cohort study compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cernakova, Miroslava, Hobusch, Gerhard M., Amann, Gabriele, Funovics, Philipp T., Windhager, Reinhard, Panotopoulos, Joannis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96953-w
_version_ 1783750054053412864
author Cernakova, Miroslava
Hobusch, Gerhard M.
Amann, Gabriele
Funovics, Philipp T.
Windhager, Reinhard
Panotopoulos, Joannis
author_facet Cernakova, Miroslava
Hobusch, Gerhard M.
Amann, Gabriele
Funovics, Philipp T.
Windhager, Reinhard
Panotopoulos, Joannis
author_sort Cernakova, Miroslava
collection PubMed
description Core needle biopsy (CNB) is gaining in importance due to its advantages in the matter of patient morbidity, time and cost. Nevertheless, controversies still exist regarding the biopsy technique of choice for the accurate diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). This retrospective cohort study compared the diagnostic performance between ultrasound-guided CNB and incisional biopsy (IB), both performed by orthopedic surgeons. The aims of the study were to answer the following questions: (1) Is ultrasound-guided CNB a highly reliable modality for diagnosing STSs? (2) Is CNB equally useful to IB for identifying histologic subtype? (3) Had patients who underwent CNB a reduced risk of complications? One-hundred and fifty-three patients who underwent resection of soft tissue sarcoma were classified into two groups according to biopsy technique prior to surgery; CNB group (n = 95) and IB group (n = 58). The final surgical specimens were in 40 patients liposarcoma (myxoid, pleomorphic and dedifferentiated), 39 undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), 33 myxofibrosarcoma, 10 synovial sarcoma, 10 leiomyosarcoma and in the remaining 21 patients different soft tissue sarcoma entities. Sarcoma location of 71 patients was in the thigh, 19 in the lower leg, 22 in the upper arm and shoulder area; 10 in the knee and gluteal region, 9 in the thoracic region, the residual 12 in other body areas. Malignancy was correctly diagnosed in 87% (83 of 95) for the CNB group and 93% (54/58) for the IB group. Correct identification rate of histologic subtype was 80% (76 of 95) in the CNB group and 83% (48 of 58) in the IB group. There were no significant differences in the correct diagnosis rates of malignancy and subtype between the two techniques. No complications were seen in the CNB group, whereas 2 patients in whom IB was performed developed pulmonary embolism and 1 patient surgical site infection. Ultrasound-guided CNB is highly accurate and not inferior to IB in diagnosing the dignity of lesions and histologic subtype in patients with suspected STSs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8426501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84265012021-09-10 Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma: an institutional experience Cernakova, Miroslava Hobusch, Gerhard M. Amann, Gabriele Funovics, Philipp T. Windhager, Reinhard Panotopoulos, Joannis Sci Rep Article Core needle biopsy (CNB) is gaining in importance due to its advantages in the matter of patient morbidity, time and cost. Nevertheless, controversies still exist regarding the biopsy technique of choice for the accurate diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). This retrospective cohort study compared the diagnostic performance between ultrasound-guided CNB and incisional biopsy (IB), both performed by orthopedic surgeons. The aims of the study were to answer the following questions: (1) Is ultrasound-guided CNB a highly reliable modality for diagnosing STSs? (2) Is CNB equally useful to IB for identifying histologic subtype? (3) Had patients who underwent CNB a reduced risk of complications? One-hundred and fifty-three patients who underwent resection of soft tissue sarcoma were classified into two groups according to biopsy technique prior to surgery; CNB group (n = 95) and IB group (n = 58). The final surgical specimens were in 40 patients liposarcoma (myxoid, pleomorphic and dedifferentiated), 39 undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), 33 myxofibrosarcoma, 10 synovial sarcoma, 10 leiomyosarcoma and in the remaining 21 patients different soft tissue sarcoma entities. Sarcoma location of 71 patients was in the thigh, 19 in the lower leg, 22 in the upper arm and shoulder area; 10 in the knee and gluteal region, 9 in the thoracic region, the residual 12 in other body areas. Malignancy was correctly diagnosed in 87% (83 of 95) for the CNB group and 93% (54/58) for the IB group. Correct identification rate of histologic subtype was 80% (76 of 95) in the CNB group and 83% (48 of 58) in the IB group. There were no significant differences in the correct diagnosis rates of malignancy and subtype between the two techniques. No complications were seen in the CNB group, whereas 2 patients in whom IB was performed developed pulmonary embolism and 1 patient surgical site infection. Ultrasound-guided CNB is highly accurate and not inferior to IB in diagnosing the dignity of lesions and histologic subtype in patients with suspected STSs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8426501/ /pubmed/34497298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96953-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Cernakova, Miroslava
Hobusch, Gerhard M.
Amann, Gabriele
Funovics, Philipp T.
Windhager, Reinhard
Panotopoulos, Joannis
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma: an institutional experience
title Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma: an institutional experience
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma: an institutional experience
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma: an institutional experience
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma: an institutional experience
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma: an institutional experience
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma: an institutional experience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96953-w
work_keys_str_mv AT cernakovamiroslava diagnosticaccuracyofultrasoundguidedcoreneedlebiopsyversusincisionalbiopsyinsofttissuesarcomaaninstitutionalexperience
AT hobuschgerhardm diagnosticaccuracyofultrasoundguidedcoreneedlebiopsyversusincisionalbiopsyinsofttissuesarcomaaninstitutionalexperience
AT amanngabriele diagnosticaccuracyofultrasoundguidedcoreneedlebiopsyversusincisionalbiopsyinsofttissuesarcomaaninstitutionalexperience
AT funovicsphilippt diagnosticaccuracyofultrasoundguidedcoreneedlebiopsyversusincisionalbiopsyinsofttissuesarcomaaninstitutionalexperience
AT windhagerreinhard diagnosticaccuracyofultrasoundguidedcoreneedlebiopsyversusincisionalbiopsyinsofttissuesarcomaaninstitutionalexperience
AT panotopoulosjoannis diagnosticaccuracyofultrasoundguidedcoreneedlebiopsyversusincisionalbiopsyinsofttissuesarcomaaninstitutionalexperience