Cargando…

The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale Predicts Clinical Outcomes 1 Year After Lung Transplantation: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

Objectives: It has been recommended that all candidates for lung transplantation undergo pre-transplant psychosocial evaluation for risk assessment. However, psychosocial issues are only important if they correlate with outcomes after transplantation. Methods: In this prospective study patients who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nöhre, Mariel, de Zwaan, Martina, Bauer-Hohmann, Maximilian, Ius, Fabio, Valtin, Christina, Gottlieb, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512417
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.704319
_version_ 1783750071814193152
author Nöhre, Mariel
de Zwaan, Martina
Bauer-Hohmann, Maximilian
Ius, Fabio
Valtin, Christina
Gottlieb, Jens
author_facet Nöhre, Mariel
de Zwaan, Martina
Bauer-Hohmann, Maximilian
Ius, Fabio
Valtin, Christina
Gottlieb, Jens
author_sort Nöhre, Mariel
collection PubMed
description Objectives: It has been recommended that all candidates for lung transplantation undergo pre-transplant psychosocial evaluation for risk assessment. However, psychosocial issues are only important if they correlate with outcomes after transplantation. Methods: In this prospective study patients who were referred for lung transplantation from 2016 to 2018 (n = 352) at Hannover Medical School were evaluated using the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS). Clinical outcomes included listing, and post-transplant outcomes including mortality, medical aspects such as lung allograft dysfunction, hospitalizations, and renal function, behavioral aspects such as BMI and adherence, and mental issues such as levels of depression, anxiety, and quality of life. TERS scores were divided into tertiles and, in addition, the impact of the two subscale scores—“defiance” and “emotional sensitivity”—was investigated. Results: Of the patients who were transplanted (n = 271) and were still alive (n = 251), 240 had already reached their 1-year assessment at the end of 2020 and were evaluated 1 year after the operation. A subgroup of 143 received an extended mental assessment. BMI, adherence scores, levels of anxiety, depression, and quality of life 1 year post-transplantation differed significantly between TERS tertiles with higher TERS scores predicting less favorable outcomes. The TERS subscale “defiance” was predictive of BMI and adherence whereas the TERS subscale “emotional sensitivity” was predictive of symptoms of anxiety and depression, and quality of life 1 year after transplantation. Patients in the lowest TERS tertile were more likely to having been listed and—as a trend—to having survived the first year after transplantation Conclusions: Our findings show that psychosocial factors as measured by TERS score are predictors of behavioral and mental outcomes 1 year after lung transplantation. The TERS allows us to focus on psychosocial risk factors that can be treated or minimized before or after transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8426579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84265792021-09-10 The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale Predicts Clinical Outcomes 1 Year After Lung Transplantation: A Prospective Longitudinal Study Nöhre, Mariel de Zwaan, Martina Bauer-Hohmann, Maximilian Ius, Fabio Valtin, Christina Gottlieb, Jens Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Objectives: It has been recommended that all candidates for lung transplantation undergo pre-transplant psychosocial evaluation for risk assessment. However, psychosocial issues are only important if they correlate with outcomes after transplantation. Methods: In this prospective study patients who were referred for lung transplantation from 2016 to 2018 (n = 352) at Hannover Medical School were evaluated using the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS). Clinical outcomes included listing, and post-transplant outcomes including mortality, medical aspects such as lung allograft dysfunction, hospitalizations, and renal function, behavioral aspects such as BMI and adherence, and mental issues such as levels of depression, anxiety, and quality of life. TERS scores were divided into tertiles and, in addition, the impact of the two subscale scores—“defiance” and “emotional sensitivity”—was investigated. Results: Of the patients who were transplanted (n = 271) and were still alive (n = 251), 240 had already reached their 1-year assessment at the end of 2020 and were evaluated 1 year after the operation. A subgroup of 143 received an extended mental assessment. BMI, adherence scores, levels of anxiety, depression, and quality of life 1 year post-transplantation differed significantly between TERS tertiles with higher TERS scores predicting less favorable outcomes. The TERS subscale “defiance” was predictive of BMI and adherence whereas the TERS subscale “emotional sensitivity” was predictive of symptoms of anxiety and depression, and quality of life 1 year after transplantation. Patients in the lowest TERS tertile were more likely to having been listed and—as a trend—to having survived the first year after transplantation Conclusions: Our findings show that psychosocial factors as measured by TERS score are predictors of behavioral and mental outcomes 1 year after lung transplantation. The TERS allows us to focus on psychosocial risk factors that can be treated or minimized before or after transplantation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8426579/ /pubmed/34512417 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.704319 Text en Copyright © 2021 Nöhre, de Zwaan, Bauer-Hohmann, Ius, Valtin and Gottlieb. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Nöhre, Mariel
de Zwaan, Martina
Bauer-Hohmann, Maximilian
Ius, Fabio
Valtin, Christina
Gottlieb, Jens
The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale Predicts Clinical Outcomes 1 Year After Lung Transplantation: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
title The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale Predicts Clinical Outcomes 1 Year After Lung Transplantation: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
title_full The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale Predicts Clinical Outcomes 1 Year After Lung Transplantation: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
title_fullStr The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale Predicts Clinical Outcomes 1 Year After Lung Transplantation: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
title_full_unstemmed The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale Predicts Clinical Outcomes 1 Year After Lung Transplantation: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
title_short The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale Predicts Clinical Outcomes 1 Year After Lung Transplantation: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
title_sort transplant evaluation rating scale predicts clinical outcomes 1 year after lung transplantation: a prospective longitudinal study
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512417
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.704319
work_keys_str_mv AT nohremariel thetransplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT dezwaanmartina thetransplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT bauerhohmannmaximilian thetransplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT iusfabio thetransplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT valtinchristina thetransplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT gottliebjens thetransplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT nohremariel transplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT dezwaanmartina transplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT bauerhohmannmaximilian transplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT iusfabio transplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT valtinchristina transplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT gottliebjens transplantevaluationratingscalepredictsclinicaloutcomes1yearafterlungtransplantationaprospectivelongitudinalstudy