Cargando…

Prediction of Mumps Incidence Trend in China Based on Difference Grey Model and Artificial Neural Network Learning

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the prediction efficiency of back propagation (BP) network and grey model (GM) (1.1) for mumps infectious diseases and compare the application effect of the two models. METHODS: By calculating the average incidence rate of mumps in January 2014 –2016, we conducted the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Jin, Liu, Mingming, Xue, Zhigang, Wang, Zhe, Pan, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568179
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i7.6630
_version_ 1783750101040103424
author Jia, Jin
Liu, Mingming
Xue, Zhigang
Wang, Zhe
Pan, Yu
author_facet Jia, Jin
Liu, Mingming
Xue, Zhigang
Wang, Zhe
Pan, Yu
author_sort Jia, Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the prediction efficiency of back propagation (BP) network and grey model (GM) (1.1) for mumps infectious diseases and compare the application effect of the two models. METHODS: By calculating the average incidence rate of mumps in January 2014 –2016, we conducted the modeling of the BP time series, GM (1,1) grey model and the combination models of them, and predicted the incidence rate in June 2016 in comparison with the actual one. We compared the quarterly incidence rate to test the two prediction models, and compared the advantages and disadvantages of these models. RESULTS: R value of BP model was 68.45%, for GM (1,1) was 58.49%, and for combined forecasting model was 86.95%. We used the principal component analysis clustering method to control the samples, and found that the samples were close to the population mean. We found that the GM (1.1) model was more suitable for the prediction of mumps infection mode. We carried out dimension reduction analysis on the model data, and the accuracy of the data after dimension reduction is within the range of Da. For the discrete degree of the data in the combined model, matlab pipeline was used to verify the reliability of the data and results. By calculation after manifold optimization small error probability was P=0.875 and semi mean relative error 2.43%. CONCLUSION: BP, GM (1,1) is a better method for modeling the epidemic trend of mumps in China, but the efficiency of prediction is not as high as the combination of them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8426770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84267702021-09-24 Prediction of Mumps Incidence Trend in China Based on Difference Grey Model and Artificial Neural Network Learning Jia, Jin Liu, Mingming Xue, Zhigang Wang, Zhe Pan, Yu Iran J Public Health Original Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the prediction efficiency of back propagation (BP) network and grey model (GM) (1.1) for mumps infectious diseases and compare the application effect of the two models. METHODS: By calculating the average incidence rate of mumps in January 2014 –2016, we conducted the modeling of the BP time series, GM (1,1) grey model and the combination models of them, and predicted the incidence rate in June 2016 in comparison with the actual one. We compared the quarterly incidence rate to test the two prediction models, and compared the advantages and disadvantages of these models. RESULTS: R value of BP model was 68.45%, for GM (1,1) was 58.49%, and for combined forecasting model was 86.95%. We used the principal component analysis clustering method to control the samples, and found that the samples were close to the population mean. We found that the GM (1.1) model was more suitable for the prediction of mumps infection mode. We carried out dimension reduction analysis on the model data, and the accuracy of the data after dimension reduction is within the range of Da. For the discrete degree of the data in the combined model, matlab pipeline was used to verify the reliability of the data and results. By calculation after manifold optimization small error probability was P=0.875 and semi mean relative error 2.43%. CONCLUSION: BP, GM (1,1) is a better method for modeling the epidemic trend of mumps in China, but the efficiency of prediction is not as high as the combination of them. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8426770/ /pubmed/34568179 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i7.6630 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jia et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jia, Jin
Liu, Mingming
Xue, Zhigang
Wang, Zhe
Pan, Yu
Prediction of Mumps Incidence Trend in China Based on Difference Grey Model and Artificial Neural Network Learning
title Prediction of Mumps Incidence Trend in China Based on Difference Grey Model and Artificial Neural Network Learning
title_full Prediction of Mumps Incidence Trend in China Based on Difference Grey Model and Artificial Neural Network Learning
title_fullStr Prediction of Mumps Incidence Trend in China Based on Difference Grey Model and Artificial Neural Network Learning
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Mumps Incidence Trend in China Based on Difference Grey Model and Artificial Neural Network Learning
title_short Prediction of Mumps Incidence Trend in China Based on Difference Grey Model and Artificial Neural Network Learning
title_sort prediction of mumps incidence trend in china based on difference grey model and artificial neural network learning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568179
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i7.6630
work_keys_str_mv AT jiajin predictionofmumpsincidencetrendinchinabasedondifferencegreymodelandartificialneuralnetworklearning
AT liumingming predictionofmumpsincidencetrendinchinabasedondifferencegreymodelandartificialneuralnetworklearning
AT xuezhigang predictionofmumpsincidencetrendinchinabasedondifferencegreymodelandartificialneuralnetworklearning
AT wangzhe predictionofmumpsincidencetrendinchinabasedondifferencegreymodelandartificialneuralnetworklearning
AT panyu predictionofmumpsincidencetrendinchinabasedondifferencegreymodelandartificialneuralnetworklearning