Cargando…

B‐cell haematological malignancies and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: Could immunological interventions influence the outcome?

B cell haematological malignancies (HMs) have been described as the worst cancer type for concomitant COVID‐19 in terms of mortality, with rates up to 65%. This risk factor for COVID‐19 cannot only be explained by comorbidities and advanced age of patients, but aggravated by secondary immunodeficien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ochoa‐Grullón, Juliana, Peña Cortijo, Ascensión, Guevara‐Hoyer, Kissy, Jiménez García, Carlos, de la Fuente, Eduardo, de la Peña, Antonia Rodríguez, Fernández‐Arquero, Miguel, González Fernández, Ata, Sánchez‐Ramón, Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.249
_version_ 1783750109491625984
author Ochoa‐Grullón, Juliana
Peña Cortijo, Ascensión
Guevara‐Hoyer, Kissy
Jiménez García, Carlos
de la Fuente, Eduardo
de la Peña, Antonia Rodríguez
Fernández‐Arquero, Miguel
González Fernández, Ata
Sánchez‐Ramón, Silvia
author_facet Ochoa‐Grullón, Juliana
Peña Cortijo, Ascensión
Guevara‐Hoyer, Kissy
Jiménez García, Carlos
de la Fuente, Eduardo
de la Peña, Antonia Rodríguez
Fernández‐Arquero, Miguel
González Fernández, Ata
Sánchez‐Ramón, Silvia
author_sort Ochoa‐Grullón, Juliana
collection PubMed
description B cell haematological malignancies (HMs) have been described as the worst cancer type for concomitant COVID‐19 in terms of mortality, with rates up to 65%. This risk factor for COVID‐19 cannot only be explained by comorbidities and advanced age of patients, but aggravated by secondary immunodeficiency (SID). We aimed at evaluating the impact of COVID‐19 on 86 HM patients with concomitant SID from a single centre. Only 14 HM patients of 86 (16.28%) patients suffered COVID‐19, with mortality rate of 7%. When we considered patients according to B‐cell defect only or multiple immune defect overlap (B‐T‐cell/NK cells/complement), patients with immune defect overlap presented 5.30‐fold higher risk of COVID‐19 than only B cell defect (95% CI, 1.67–17.0) (p = 0.004). Seven (50%) patients were on active IgRT; while five (36%) had received prior mucosal vaccines for respiratory infections. Our results show that modelling SID in HM may contribute to better prediction of infectious risk and to prompt more targeted and timely preventive therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8426868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84268682021-09-09 B‐cell haematological malignancies and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: Could immunological interventions influence the outcome? Ochoa‐Grullón, Juliana Peña Cortijo, Ascensión Guevara‐Hoyer, Kissy Jiménez García, Carlos de la Fuente, Eduardo de la Peña, Antonia Rodríguez Fernández‐Arquero, Miguel González Fernández, Ata Sánchez‐Ramón, Silvia EJHaem Short Reports B cell haematological malignancies (HMs) have been described as the worst cancer type for concomitant COVID‐19 in terms of mortality, with rates up to 65%. This risk factor for COVID‐19 cannot only be explained by comorbidities and advanced age of patients, but aggravated by secondary immunodeficiency (SID). We aimed at evaluating the impact of COVID‐19 on 86 HM patients with concomitant SID from a single centre. Only 14 HM patients of 86 (16.28%) patients suffered COVID‐19, with mortality rate of 7%. When we considered patients according to B‐cell defect only or multiple immune defect overlap (B‐T‐cell/NK cells/complement), patients with immune defect overlap presented 5.30‐fold higher risk of COVID‐19 than only B cell defect (95% CI, 1.67–17.0) (p = 0.004). Seven (50%) patients were on active IgRT; while five (36%) had received prior mucosal vaccines for respiratory infections. Our results show that modelling SID in HM may contribute to better prediction of infectious risk and to prompt more targeted and timely preventive therapies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8426868/ /pubmed/34518828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.249 Text en © 2021 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Reports
Ochoa‐Grullón, Juliana
Peña Cortijo, Ascensión
Guevara‐Hoyer, Kissy
Jiménez García, Carlos
de la Fuente, Eduardo
de la Peña, Antonia Rodríguez
Fernández‐Arquero, Miguel
González Fernández, Ata
Sánchez‐Ramón, Silvia
B‐cell haematological malignancies and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: Could immunological interventions influence the outcome?
title B‐cell haematological malignancies and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: Could immunological interventions influence the outcome?
title_full B‐cell haematological malignancies and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: Could immunological interventions influence the outcome?
title_fullStr B‐cell haematological malignancies and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: Could immunological interventions influence the outcome?
title_full_unstemmed B‐cell haematological malignancies and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: Could immunological interventions influence the outcome?
title_short B‐cell haematological malignancies and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: Could immunological interventions influence the outcome?
title_sort b‐cell haematological malignancies and sars‐cov‐2 infection: could immunological interventions influence the outcome?
topic Short Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.249
work_keys_str_mv AT ochoagrullonjuliana bcellhaematologicalmalignanciesandsarscov2infectioncouldimmunologicalinterventionsinfluencetheoutcome
AT penacortijoascension bcellhaematologicalmalignanciesandsarscov2infectioncouldimmunologicalinterventionsinfluencetheoutcome
AT guevarahoyerkissy bcellhaematologicalmalignanciesandsarscov2infectioncouldimmunologicalinterventionsinfluencetheoutcome
AT jimenezgarciacarlos bcellhaematologicalmalignanciesandsarscov2infectioncouldimmunologicalinterventionsinfluencetheoutcome
AT delafuenteeduardo bcellhaematologicalmalignanciesandsarscov2infectioncouldimmunologicalinterventionsinfluencetheoutcome
AT delapenaantoniarodriguez bcellhaematologicalmalignanciesandsarscov2infectioncouldimmunologicalinterventionsinfluencetheoutcome
AT fernandezarqueromiguel bcellhaematologicalmalignanciesandsarscov2infectioncouldimmunologicalinterventionsinfluencetheoutcome
AT gonzalezfernandezata bcellhaematologicalmalignanciesandsarscov2infectioncouldimmunologicalinterventionsinfluencetheoutcome
AT sanchezramonsilvia bcellhaematologicalmalignanciesandsarscov2infectioncouldimmunologicalinterventionsinfluencetheoutcome