Cargando…

A retrospective analysis of bull:cow ratio effects on pregnancy rates of beef cows previously enrolled in fixed-time artificial insemination protocols

This retrospective study aimed to determine if the number of cows exposed per bull affects pregnancy rates of cows returning to estrus after fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). Data were compiled over the course of 13 breeding seasons (six fall and seven spring seasons) between 2010 and 2017...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timlin, Claire L, Dias, Nicholas W, Hungerford, Laura, Redifer, Tracey, Currin, John F, Mercadante, Vitor R G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab129
_version_ 1783750139031060480
author Timlin, Claire L
Dias, Nicholas W
Hungerford, Laura
Redifer, Tracey
Currin, John F
Mercadante, Vitor R G
author_facet Timlin, Claire L
Dias, Nicholas W
Hungerford, Laura
Redifer, Tracey
Currin, John F
Mercadante, Vitor R G
author_sort Timlin, Claire L
collection PubMed
description This retrospective study aimed to determine if the number of cows exposed per bull affects pregnancy rates of cows returning to estrus after fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). Data were compiled over the course of 13 breeding seasons (six fall and seven spring seasons) between 2010 and 2017 from the Virginia Department of Corrections herd. Available records contained data from 17 farms and 324 groups of cows (average 47 cows/group). Multiparous cows and heifers (average age per group: 5.11 ± 0.14 yr; n = 14,868) were exposed to FTAI. After FTAI, animals were placed on pasture with bulls diagnosed as fertile by a breeding soundness exam for natural service of cows who did not become pregnant to FTAI (n = 7,248; average 22 cows/group). Animals were classified as pregnant to FTAI, to natural service on first return to estrus, or to natural service on second or subsequent estrus determined by fetal aging at pregnancy diagnosis. The bull:cow ratio for the total number of cows exposed ranged from 1:9 to 1:73 with an average of 1:31. The bull:cow ratio considering only open cows exposed after FTAI ranged from 1:2 to 1:44 with an average of 1:14. There was significant negative, small correlation between the bull:cow ratio for total number of cows exposed and return to estrus pregnancy rate in fall breeding seasons (P = 0.01, r(2) = 0.04) but not in spring (P = 0.90). There was a significant negative, small correlation between bull:cow ratio of open cows exposed and pregnancy rates to first return to estrus in fall herds with a single sire (P < 0.001, r(2) = 0.11). There was no correlation in fall herds using multiple sires or spring herds (P ≥ 0.12). Bull:cow ratio accounted for only 1–11% of variation in the pregnancy rates, thus we conclude that a decreased bull:cow ratio (up to 1:73) did not affect natural service return to estrus pregnancy rate. Cattlemen may consider a reduced number of bulls needed for natural service breeding after FTAI, which can decrease bull related costs and increase the economic feasibility of adopting FTAI protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8427174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84271742021-09-09 A retrospective analysis of bull:cow ratio effects on pregnancy rates of beef cows previously enrolled in fixed-time artificial insemination protocols Timlin, Claire L Dias, Nicholas W Hungerford, Laura Redifer, Tracey Currin, John F Mercadante, Vitor R G Transl Anim Sci Reproduction This retrospective study aimed to determine if the number of cows exposed per bull affects pregnancy rates of cows returning to estrus after fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). Data were compiled over the course of 13 breeding seasons (six fall and seven spring seasons) between 2010 and 2017 from the Virginia Department of Corrections herd. Available records contained data from 17 farms and 324 groups of cows (average 47 cows/group). Multiparous cows and heifers (average age per group: 5.11 ± 0.14 yr; n = 14,868) were exposed to FTAI. After FTAI, animals were placed on pasture with bulls diagnosed as fertile by a breeding soundness exam for natural service of cows who did not become pregnant to FTAI (n = 7,248; average 22 cows/group). Animals were classified as pregnant to FTAI, to natural service on first return to estrus, or to natural service on second or subsequent estrus determined by fetal aging at pregnancy diagnosis. The bull:cow ratio for the total number of cows exposed ranged from 1:9 to 1:73 with an average of 1:31. The bull:cow ratio considering only open cows exposed after FTAI ranged from 1:2 to 1:44 with an average of 1:14. There was significant negative, small correlation between the bull:cow ratio for total number of cows exposed and return to estrus pregnancy rate in fall breeding seasons (P = 0.01, r(2) = 0.04) but not in spring (P = 0.90). There was a significant negative, small correlation between bull:cow ratio of open cows exposed and pregnancy rates to first return to estrus in fall herds with a single sire (P < 0.001, r(2) = 0.11). There was no correlation in fall herds using multiple sires or spring herds (P ≥ 0.12). Bull:cow ratio accounted for only 1–11% of variation in the pregnancy rates, thus we conclude that a decreased bull:cow ratio (up to 1:73) did not affect natural service return to estrus pregnancy rate. Cattlemen may consider a reduced number of bulls needed for natural service breeding after FTAI, which can decrease bull related costs and increase the economic feasibility of adopting FTAI protocols. Oxford University Press 2021-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8427174/ /pubmed/34514347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab129 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Reproduction
Timlin, Claire L
Dias, Nicholas W
Hungerford, Laura
Redifer, Tracey
Currin, John F
Mercadante, Vitor R G
A retrospective analysis of bull:cow ratio effects on pregnancy rates of beef cows previously enrolled in fixed-time artificial insemination protocols
title A retrospective analysis of bull:cow ratio effects on pregnancy rates of beef cows previously enrolled in fixed-time artificial insemination protocols
title_full A retrospective analysis of bull:cow ratio effects on pregnancy rates of beef cows previously enrolled in fixed-time artificial insemination protocols
title_fullStr A retrospective analysis of bull:cow ratio effects on pregnancy rates of beef cows previously enrolled in fixed-time artificial insemination protocols
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective analysis of bull:cow ratio effects on pregnancy rates of beef cows previously enrolled in fixed-time artificial insemination protocols
title_short A retrospective analysis of bull:cow ratio effects on pregnancy rates of beef cows previously enrolled in fixed-time artificial insemination protocols
title_sort retrospective analysis of bull:cow ratio effects on pregnancy rates of beef cows previously enrolled in fixed-time artificial insemination protocols
topic Reproduction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab129
work_keys_str_mv AT timlinclairel aretrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols
AT diasnicholasw aretrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols
AT hungerfordlaura aretrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols
AT redifertracey aretrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols
AT currinjohnf aretrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols
AT mercadantevitorrg aretrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols
AT timlinclairel retrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols
AT diasnicholasw retrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols
AT hungerfordlaura retrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols
AT redifertracey retrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols
AT currinjohnf retrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols
AT mercadantevitorrg retrospectiveanalysisofbullcowratioeffectsonpregnancyratesofbeefcowspreviouslyenrolledinfixedtimeartificialinseminationprotocols