Cargando…

Radiobiological Implications of Nanoparticles Following Radiation Treatment

Materials with a high atomic number (Z) are shown to cause an increase in the level of cell kill by ionizing radiation when introduced into tumor cells. This study uses in vitro experiments to investigate the differences in radiosensitization between two cell lines (MCF‐7 and U87) and three commerci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Reem, Schettino, Giuseppe, Royle, Gary, Barry, Miriam, Pankhurst, Quentin A., Tillement, Olivier, Russell, Ben, Ricketts, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.201900411
_version_ 1783750181560254464
author Ahmad, Reem
Schettino, Giuseppe
Royle, Gary
Barry, Miriam
Pankhurst, Quentin A.
Tillement, Olivier
Russell, Ben
Ricketts, Kate
author_facet Ahmad, Reem
Schettino, Giuseppe
Royle, Gary
Barry, Miriam
Pankhurst, Quentin A.
Tillement, Olivier
Russell, Ben
Ricketts, Kate
author_sort Ahmad, Reem
collection PubMed
description Materials with a high atomic number (Z) are shown to cause an increase in the level of cell kill by ionizing radiation when introduced into tumor cells. This study uses in vitro experiments to investigate the differences in radiosensitization between two cell lines (MCF‐7 and U87) and three commercially available nanoparticles (gold, gadolinium, and iron oxide) irradiated by 6 MV X‐rays. To assess cell survival, clonogenic assays are carried out for all variables considered, with a concentration of 0.5 mg mL(−1) for each nanoparticle material used. This study demonstrates differences in cell survival between nanoparticles and cell line. U87 shows the greatest enhancement with gadolinium nanoparticles (2.02 ± 0.36), whereas MCF‐7 cells have higher enhancement with gold nanoparticles (1.74 ± 0.08). Mass spectrometry, however, shows highest elemental uptake with iron oxide and U87 cells with 4.95 ± 0.82 pg of iron oxide per cell. A complex relationship between cellular elemental uptake is demonstrated, highlighting an inverse correlation with the enhancement, but a positive relation with DNA damage when comparing the same nanoparticle between the two cell lines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8427468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84274682021-09-13 Radiobiological Implications of Nanoparticles Following Radiation Treatment Ahmad, Reem Schettino, Giuseppe Royle, Gary Barry, Miriam Pankhurst, Quentin A. Tillement, Olivier Russell, Ben Ricketts, Kate Part Part Syst Charact Full Papers Materials with a high atomic number (Z) are shown to cause an increase in the level of cell kill by ionizing radiation when introduced into tumor cells. This study uses in vitro experiments to investigate the differences in radiosensitization between two cell lines (MCF‐7 and U87) and three commercially available nanoparticles (gold, gadolinium, and iron oxide) irradiated by 6 MV X‐rays. To assess cell survival, clonogenic assays are carried out for all variables considered, with a concentration of 0.5 mg mL(−1) for each nanoparticle material used. This study demonstrates differences in cell survival between nanoparticles and cell line. U87 shows the greatest enhancement with gadolinium nanoparticles (2.02 ± 0.36), whereas MCF‐7 cells have higher enhancement with gold nanoparticles (1.74 ± 0.08). Mass spectrometry, however, shows highest elemental uptake with iron oxide and U87 cells with 4.95 ± 0.82 pg of iron oxide per cell. A complex relationship between cellular elemental uptake is demonstrated, highlighting an inverse correlation with the enhancement, but a positive relation with DNA damage when comparing the same nanoparticle between the two cell lines. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-03 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8427468/ /pubmed/34526737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.201900411 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Ahmad, Reem
Schettino, Giuseppe
Royle, Gary
Barry, Miriam
Pankhurst, Quentin A.
Tillement, Olivier
Russell, Ben
Ricketts, Kate
Radiobiological Implications of Nanoparticles Following Radiation Treatment
title Radiobiological Implications of Nanoparticles Following Radiation Treatment
title_full Radiobiological Implications of Nanoparticles Following Radiation Treatment
title_fullStr Radiobiological Implications of Nanoparticles Following Radiation Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Radiobiological Implications of Nanoparticles Following Radiation Treatment
title_short Radiobiological Implications of Nanoparticles Following Radiation Treatment
title_sort radiobiological implications of nanoparticles following radiation treatment
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.201900411
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadreem radiobiologicalimplicationsofnanoparticlesfollowingradiationtreatment
AT schettinogiuseppe radiobiologicalimplicationsofnanoparticlesfollowingradiationtreatment
AT roylegary radiobiologicalimplicationsofnanoparticlesfollowingradiationtreatment
AT barrymiriam radiobiologicalimplicationsofnanoparticlesfollowingradiationtreatment
AT pankhurstquentina radiobiologicalimplicationsofnanoparticlesfollowingradiationtreatment
AT tillementolivier radiobiologicalimplicationsofnanoparticlesfollowingradiationtreatment
AT russellben radiobiologicalimplicationsofnanoparticlesfollowingradiationtreatment
AT rickettskate radiobiologicalimplicationsofnanoparticlesfollowingradiationtreatment