Cargando…

Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Although most research universities offer investigators help in obtaining patents for inventions, investigators generally have few resources for scaling up non-patentable innovations, such as health behavior change interventions. In 2017, the dissemination and implementation (D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quanbeck, Andrew, Johnson, Roberta A., Saha-Muldowney, Mondira, Resnik, Felice, Hirschfield, Sheena, Meline, Rachael R., Mahoney, Jane E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.828
_version_ 1783750195449692160
author Quanbeck, Andrew
Johnson, Roberta A.
Saha-Muldowney, Mondira
Resnik, Felice
Hirschfield, Sheena
Meline, Rachael R.
Mahoney, Jane E.
author_facet Quanbeck, Andrew
Johnson, Roberta A.
Saha-Muldowney, Mondira
Resnik, Felice
Hirschfield, Sheena
Meline, Rachael R.
Mahoney, Jane E.
author_sort Quanbeck, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Although most research universities offer investigators help in obtaining patents for inventions, investigators generally have few resources for scaling up non-patentable innovations, such as health behavior change interventions. In 2017, the dissemination and implementation (D & I) team at the University of Wisconsin’s Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) created the Evidence-to-Implementation (E2I) award to encourage the scale-up of proven, non-patentable health interventions. The award was intended to give investigators financial support and business expertise to prepare evidence-based interventions for scale-up. METHODS: The D & I team adapted a set of criteria named Critical Factors Assessment, which has proven effective in predicting the success of entrepreneurial ventures outside the health care environment, to use as review criteria for the program. In March 2018 and February 2020, multidisciplinary panels assessed proposals using a review process loosely based on the one used by the NIH for grant proposals, replacing the traditional NIH scoring criteria with the eight predictive factors included in Critical Factors Assessment. RESULTS: two applications in 2018 and three applications in 2020 earned awards. Funding has ended for the first two awardees, and both innovations have advanced successfully. CONCLUSION: Late-stage translation, though often overlooked by the academic community, is essential to maximizing the overall impact of the science generated by CTSAs. The Evidence-to-implementation award provides a working model for supporting late-stage translation within a CTSA environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8427544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84275442021-09-14 Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award Quanbeck, Andrew Johnson, Roberta A. Saha-Muldowney, Mondira Resnik, Felice Hirschfield, Sheena Meline, Rachael R. Mahoney, Jane E. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Although most research universities offer investigators help in obtaining patents for inventions, investigators generally have few resources for scaling up non-patentable innovations, such as health behavior change interventions. In 2017, the dissemination and implementation (D & I) team at the University of Wisconsin’s Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) created the Evidence-to-Implementation (E2I) award to encourage the scale-up of proven, non-patentable health interventions. The award was intended to give investigators financial support and business expertise to prepare evidence-based interventions for scale-up. METHODS: The D & I team adapted a set of criteria named Critical Factors Assessment, which has proven effective in predicting the success of entrepreneurial ventures outside the health care environment, to use as review criteria for the program. In March 2018 and February 2020, multidisciplinary panels assessed proposals using a review process loosely based on the one used by the NIH for grant proposals, replacing the traditional NIH scoring criteria with the eight predictive factors included in Critical Factors Assessment. RESULTS: two applications in 2018 and three applications in 2020 earned awards. Funding has ended for the first two awardees, and both innovations have advanced successfully. CONCLUSION: Late-stage translation, though often overlooked by the academic community, is essential to maximizing the overall impact of the science generated by CTSAs. The Evidence-to-implementation award provides a working model for supporting late-stage translation within a CTSA environment. Cambridge University Press 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8427544/ /pubmed/34527299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.828 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Quanbeck, Andrew
Johnson, Roberta A.
Saha-Muldowney, Mondira
Resnik, Felice
Hirschfield, Sheena
Meline, Rachael R.
Mahoney, Jane E.
Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award
title Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award
title_full Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award
title_fullStr Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award
title_full_unstemmed Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award
title_short Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award
title_sort encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: infrastructure development for the “evidence-to-implementation” award
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.828
work_keys_str_mv AT quanbeckandrew encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward
AT johnsonrobertaa encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward
AT sahamuldowneymondira encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward
AT resnikfelice encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward
AT hirschfieldsheena encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward
AT melinerachaelr encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward
AT mahoneyjanee encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward