Cargando…
Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Although most research universities offer investigators help in obtaining patents for inventions, investigators generally have few resources for scaling up non-patentable innovations, such as health behavior change interventions. In 2017, the dissemination and implementation (D...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.828 |
_version_ | 1783750195449692160 |
---|---|
author | Quanbeck, Andrew Johnson, Roberta A. Saha-Muldowney, Mondira Resnik, Felice Hirschfield, Sheena Meline, Rachael R. Mahoney, Jane E. |
author_facet | Quanbeck, Andrew Johnson, Roberta A. Saha-Muldowney, Mondira Resnik, Felice Hirschfield, Sheena Meline, Rachael R. Mahoney, Jane E. |
author_sort | Quanbeck, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Although most research universities offer investigators help in obtaining patents for inventions, investigators generally have few resources for scaling up non-patentable innovations, such as health behavior change interventions. In 2017, the dissemination and implementation (D & I) team at the University of Wisconsin’s Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) created the Evidence-to-Implementation (E2I) award to encourage the scale-up of proven, non-patentable health interventions. The award was intended to give investigators financial support and business expertise to prepare evidence-based interventions for scale-up. METHODS: The D & I team adapted a set of criteria named Critical Factors Assessment, which has proven effective in predicting the success of entrepreneurial ventures outside the health care environment, to use as review criteria for the program. In March 2018 and February 2020, multidisciplinary panels assessed proposals using a review process loosely based on the one used by the NIH for grant proposals, replacing the traditional NIH scoring criteria with the eight predictive factors included in Critical Factors Assessment. RESULTS: two applications in 2018 and three applications in 2020 earned awards. Funding has ended for the first two awardees, and both innovations have advanced successfully. CONCLUSION: Late-stage translation, though often overlooked by the academic community, is essential to maximizing the overall impact of the science generated by CTSAs. The Evidence-to-implementation award provides a working model for supporting late-stage translation within a CTSA environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8427544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84275442021-09-14 Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award Quanbeck, Andrew Johnson, Roberta A. Saha-Muldowney, Mondira Resnik, Felice Hirschfield, Sheena Meline, Rachael R. Mahoney, Jane E. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Although most research universities offer investigators help in obtaining patents for inventions, investigators generally have few resources for scaling up non-patentable innovations, such as health behavior change interventions. In 2017, the dissemination and implementation (D & I) team at the University of Wisconsin’s Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) created the Evidence-to-Implementation (E2I) award to encourage the scale-up of proven, non-patentable health interventions. The award was intended to give investigators financial support and business expertise to prepare evidence-based interventions for scale-up. METHODS: The D & I team adapted a set of criteria named Critical Factors Assessment, which has proven effective in predicting the success of entrepreneurial ventures outside the health care environment, to use as review criteria for the program. In March 2018 and February 2020, multidisciplinary panels assessed proposals using a review process loosely based on the one used by the NIH for grant proposals, replacing the traditional NIH scoring criteria with the eight predictive factors included in Critical Factors Assessment. RESULTS: two applications in 2018 and three applications in 2020 earned awards. Funding has ended for the first two awardees, and both innovations have advanced successfully. CONCLUSION: Late-stage translation, though often overlooked by the academic community, is essential to maximizing the overall impact of the science generated by CTSAs. The Evidence-to-implementation award provides a working model for supporting late-stage translation within a CTSA environment. Cambridge University Press 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8427544/ /pubmed/34527299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.828 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Quanbeck, Andrew Johnson, Roberta A. Saha-Muldowney, Mondira Resnik, Felice Hirschfield, Sheena Meline, Rachael R. Mahoney, Jane E. Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award |
title | Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award |
title_full | Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award |
title_fullStr | Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award |
title_full_unstemmed | Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award |
title_short | Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award |
title_sort | encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: infrastructure development for the “evidence-to-implementation” award |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.828 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quanbeckandrew encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward AT johnsonrobertaa encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward AT sahamuldowneymondira encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward AT resnikfelice encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward AT hirschfieldsheena encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward AT melinerachaelr encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward AT mahoneyjanee encouragingthescaleupofproveninterventionsinfrastructuredevelopmentfortheevidencetoimplementationaward |