Cargando…
A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes
Diffusible iodine‐based contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) visualizes soft tissue from micro‐CT (µCT) scans of specimens to uncover internal features and natural history information without incurring physical damage via dissection. Unlike hard‐tissue imaging, taxonomic sampling within di...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7467 |
_version_ | 1783750201363660800 |
---|---|
author | Callahan, Sean Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M. Nagesan, Ramon S. Gray, Jaimi A. Davis Rabosky, Alison R. |
author_facet | Callahan, Sean Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M. Nagesan, Ramon S. Gray, Jaimi A. Davis Rabosky, Alison R. |
author_sort | Callahan, Sean |
collection | PubMed |
description | Diffusible iodine‐based contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) visualizes soft tissue from micro‐CT (µCT) scans of specimens to uncover internal features and natural history information without incurring physical damage via dissection. Unlike hard‐tissue imaging, taxonomic sampling within diceCT datasets is currently limited. To initiate best practices for diceCT in a nonmodel group, we outline a guide for staining and high‐throughput µCT scanning in snakes. We scanned the entire body and one region of interest (i.e., head) for 23 specimens representing 23 species from the clades Aniliidae, Dipsadinae, Colubrinae, Elapidae, Lamprophiidae, and Viperidae. We generated 82 scans that include 1.25% Lugol's iodine stained (soft tissue) and unstained (skeletal) data for each specimen. We found that duration of optimal staining time increased linearly with body size; head radius was the best indicator. Postreconstruction of scans, optimal staining was evident by evenly distributed grayscale values and clear differentiation among soft‐tissue anatomy. Under and over stained specimens produced poor contrast among soft tissues, which was often exacerbated by user bias during “digital dissections” (i.e., segmentation). Regardless, all scans produced usable data from which we assessed a range of downstream analytical applications within ecology and evolution (e.g., predator‐prey interactions, life history, and morphological evolution). Ethanol destaining reversed the known effects of iodine on the exterior appearance of physical specimens, but required substantially more time than reported for other destaining methods. We discuss the feasibility of implementing diceCT techniques for a new user, including approximate financial and temporal commitments, required facilities, and potential effects of staining on specimens. We present the first high‐throughput workflow for full‐body skeletal and diceCT scanning in snakes, which can be generalized to any elongate vertebrates, and increases publicly available diceCT scans for reptiles by an order of magnitude. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8427571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84275712021-09-13 A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes Callahan, Sean Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M. Nagesan, Ramon S. Gray, Jaimi A. Davis Rabosky, Alison R. Ecol Evol Original Research Diffusible iodine‐based contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) visualizes soft tissue from micro‐CT (µCT) scans of specimens to uncover internal features and natural history information without incurring physical damage via dissection. Unlike hard‐tissue imaging, taxonomic sampling within diceCT datasets is currently limited. To initiate best practices for diceCT in a nonmodel group, we outline a guide for staining and high‐throughput µCT scanning in snakes. We scanned the entire body and one region of interest (i.e., head) for 23 specimens representing 23 species from the clades Aniliidae, Dipsadinae, Colubrinae, Elapidae, Lamprophiidae, and Viperidae. We generated 82 scans that include 1.25% Lugol's iodine stained (soft tissue) and unstained (skeletal) data for each specimen. We found that duration of optimal staining time increased linearly with body size; head radius was the best indicator. Postreconstruction of scans, optimal staining was evident by evenly distributed grayscale values and clear differentiation among soft‐tissue anatomy. Under and over stained specimens produced poor contrast among soft tissues, which was often exacerbated by user bias during “digital dissections” (i.e., segmentation). Regardless, all scans produced usable data from which we assessed a range of downstream analytical applications within ecology and evolution (e.g., predator‐prey interactions, life history, and morphological evolution). Ethanol destaining reversed the known effects of iodine on the exterior appearance of physical specimens, but required substantially more time than reported for other destaining methods. We discuss the feasibility of implementing diceCT techniques for a new user, including approximate financial and temporal commitments, required facilities, and potential effects of staining on specimens. We present the first high‐throughput workflow for full‐body skeletal and diceCT scanning in snakes, which can be generalized to any elongate vertebrates, and increases publicly available diceCT scans for reptiles by an order of magnitude. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8427571/ /pubmed/34522326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7467 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Callahan, Sean Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M. Nagesan, Ramon S. Gray, Jaimi A. Davis Rabosky, Alison R. A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes |
title | A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes |
title_full | A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes |
title_fullStr | A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes |
title_full_unstemmed | A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes |
title_short | A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes |
title_sort | guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput dicect scanning in snakes |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7467 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT callahansean aguideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes AT croweriddelljennam aguideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes AT nagesanramons aguideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes AT grayjaimia aguideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes AT davisraboskyalisonr aguideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes AT callahansean guideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes AT croweriddelljennam guideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes AT nagesanramons guideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes AT grayjaimia guideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes AT davisraboskyalisonr guideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes |