Cargando…

A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes

Diffusible iodine‐based contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) visualizes soft tissue from micro‐CT (µCT) scans of specimens to uncover internal features and natural history information without incurring physical damage via dissection. Unlike hard‐tissue imaging, taxonomic sampling within di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Callahan, Sean, Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M., Nagesan, Ramon S., Gray, Jaimi A., Davis Rabosky, Alison R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7467
_version_ 1783750201363660800
author Callahan, Sean
Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M.
Nagesan, Ramon S.
Gray, Jaimi A.
Davis Rabosky, Alison R.
author_facet Callahan, Sean
Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M.
Nagesan, Ramon S.
Gray, Jaimi A.
Davis Rabosky, Alison R.
author_sort Callahan, Sean
collection PubMed
description Diffusible iodine‐based contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) visualizes soft tissue from micro‐CT (µCT) scans of specimens to uncover internal features and natural history information without incurring physical damage via dissection. Unlike hard‐tissue imaging, taxonomic sampling within diceCT datasets is currently limited. To initiate best practices for diceCT in a nonmodel group, we outline a guide for staining and high‐throughput µCT scanning in snakes. We scanned the entire body and one region of interest (i.e., head) for 23 specimens representing 23 species from the clades Aniliidae, Dipsadinae, Colubrinae, Elapidae, Lamprophiidae, and Viperidae. We generated 82 scans that include 1.25% Lugol's iodine stained (soft tissue) and unstained (skeletal) data for each specimen. We found that duration of optimal staining time increased linearly with body size; head radius was the best indicator. Postreconstruction of scans, optimal staining was evident by evenly distributed grayscale values and clear differentiation among soft‐tissue anatomy. Under and over stained specimens produced poor contrast among soft tissues, which was often exacerbated by user bias during “digital dissections” (i.e., segmentation). Regardless, all scans produced usable data from which we assessed a range of downstream analytical applications within ecology and evolution (e.g., predator‐prey interactions, life history, and morphological evolution). Ethanol destaining reversed the known effects of iodine on the exterior appearance of physical specimens, but required substantially more time than reported for other destaining methods. We discuss the feasibility of implementing diceCT techniques for a new user, including approximate financial and temporal commitments, required facilities, and potential effects of staining on specimens. We present the first high‐throughput workflow for full‐body skeletal and diceCT scanning in snakes, which can be generalized to any elongate vertebrates, and increases publicly available diceCT scans for reptiles by an order of magnitude.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8427571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84275712021-09-13 A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes Callahan, Sean Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M. Nagesan, Ramon S. Gray, Jaimi A. Davis Rabosky, Alison R. Ecol Evol Original Research Diffusible iodine‐based contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) visualizes soft tissue from micro‐CT (µCT) scans of specimens to uncover internal features and natural history information without incurring physical damage via dissection. Unlike hard‐tissue imaging, taxonomic sampling within diceCT datasets is currently limited. To initiate best practices for diceCT in a nonmodel group, we outline a guide for staining and high‐throughput µCT scanning in snakes. We scanned the entire body and one region of interest (i.e., head) for 23 specimens representing 23 species from the clades Aniliidae, Dipsadinae, Colubrinae, Elapidae, Lamprophiidae, and Viperidae. We generated 82 scans that include 1.25% Lugol's iodine stained (soft tissue) and unstained (skeletal) data for each specimen. We found that duration of optimal staining time increased linearly with body size; head radius was the best indicator. Postreconstruction of scans, optimal staining was evident by evenly distributed grayscale values and clear differentiation among soft‐tissue anatomy. Under and over stained specimens produced poor contrast among soft tissues, which was often exacerbated by user bias during “digital dissections” (i.e., segmentation). Regardless, all scans produced usable data from which we assessed a range of downstream analytical applications within ecology and evolution (e.g., predator‐prey interactions, life history, and morphological evolution). Ethanol destaining reversed the known effects of iodine on the exterior appearance of physical specimens, but required substantially more time than reported for other destaining methods. We discuss the feasibility of implementing diceCT techniques for a new user, including approximate financial and temporal commitments, required facilities, and potential effects of staining on specimens. We present the first high‐throughput workflow for full‐body skeletal and diceCT scanning in snakes, which can be generalized to any elongate vertebrates, and increases publicly available diceCT scans for reptiles by an order of magnitude. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8427571/ /pubmed/34522326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7467 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Callahan, Sean
Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M.
Nagesan, Ramon S.
Gray, Jaimi A.
Davis Rabosky, Alison R.
A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes
title A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes
title_full A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes
title_fullStr A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes
title_full_unstemmed A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes
title_short A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes
title_sort guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput dicect scanning in snakes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7467
work_keys_str_mv AT callahansean aguideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes
AT croweriddelljennam aguideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes
AT nagesanramons aguideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes
AT grayjaimia aguideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes
AT davisraboskyalisonr aguideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes
AT callahansean guideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes
AT croweriddelljennam guideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes
AT nagesanramons guideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes
AT grayjaimia guideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes
AT davisraboskyalisonr guideforoptimaliodinestainingandhighthroughputdicectscanninginsnakes