Cargando…

Moderate plant–soil feedbacks have small effects on the biodiversity–productivity relationship: A field experiment

Plant–soil feedback (PSF) has gained attention as a mechanism promoting plant growth and coexistence. However, most PSF research has measured monoculture growth in greenhouse conditions. Translating PSFs into effects on plant growth in field communities remains an important frontier for PSF research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grenzer, Josephine, Kulmatiski, Andrew, Forero, Leslie, Ebeling, Anne, Eisenhauer, Nico, Norton, Jeanette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7819
_version_ 1783750204173844480
author Grenzer, Josephine
Kulmatiski, Andrew
Forero, Leslie
Ebeling, Anne
Eisenhauer, Nico
Norton, Jeanette
author_facet Grenzer, Josephine
Kulmatiski, Andrew
Forero, Leslie
Ebeling, Anne
Eisenhauer, Nico
Norton, Jeanette
author_sort Grenzer, Josephine
collection PubMed
description Plant–soil feedback (PSF) has gained attention as a mechanism promoting plant growth and coexistence. However, most PSF research has measured monoculture growth in greenhouse conditions. Translating PSFs into effects on plant growth in field communities remains an important frontier for PSF research. Using a 4‐year, factorial field experiment in Jena, Germany, we measured the growth of nine grassland species on soils conditioned by each of the target species (i.e., 72 PSFs). Plant community models were parameterized with or without these PSF effects, and model predictions were compared to plant biomass production in diversity–productivity experiments. Plants created soils that changed subsequent plant biomass by 40%. However, because they were both positive and negative, the average PSF effect was 14% less growth on “home” than on “away” soils. Nine‐species plant communities produced 29 to 37% more biomass for polycultures than for monocultures due primarily to selection effects. With or without PSF, plant community models predicted 28%–29% more biomass for polycultures than for monocultures, again due primarily to selection effects. Synthesis: Despite causing 40% changes in plant biomass, PSFs had little effect on model predictions of plant community biomass across a range of species richness. While somewhat surprising, a lack of a PSF effect was appropriate in this site because species richness effects in this study were caused by selection effects and not complementarity effects (PSFs are a complementarity mechanism). Our plant community models helped us describe several reasons that even large PSF may not affect plant productivity. Notably, we found that dominant species demonstrated small PSF, suggesting there may be selective pressure for plants to create neutral PSF. Broadly, testing PSFs in plant communities in field conditions provided a more realistic understanding of how PSFs affect plant growth in communities in the context of other species traits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8427583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84275832021-09-13 Moderate plant–soil feedbacks have small effects on the biodiversity–productivity relationship: A field experiment Grenzer, Josephine Kulmatiski, Andrew Forero, Leslie Ebeling, Anne Eisenhauer, Nico Norton, Jeanette Ecol Evol Original Research Plant–soil feedback (PSF) has gained attention as a mechanism promoting plant growth and coexistence. However, most PSF research has measured monoculture growth in greenhouse conditions. Translating PSFs into effects on plant growth in field communities remains an important frontier for PSF research. Using a 4‐year, factorial field experiment in Jena, Germany, we measured the growth of nine grassland species on soils conditioned by each of the target species (i.e., 72 PSFs). Plant community models were parameterized with or without these PSF effects, and model predictions were compared to plant biomass production in diversity–productivity experiments. Plants created soils that changed subsequent plant biomass by 40%. However, because they were both positive and negative, the average PSF effect was 14% less growth on “home” than on “away” soils. Nine‐species plant communities produced 29 to 37% more biomass for polycultures than for monocultures due primarily to selection effects. With or without PSF, plant community models predicted 28%–29% more biomass for polycultures than for monocultures, again due primarily to selection effects. Synthesis: Despite causing 40% changes in plant biomass, PSFs had little effect on model predictions of plant community biomass across a range of species richness. While somewhat surprising, a lack of a PSF effect was appropriate in this site because species richness effects in this study were caused by selection effects and not complementarity effects (PSFs are a complementarity mechanism). Our plant community models helped us describe several reasons that even large PSF may not affect plant productivity. Notably, we found that dominant species demonstrated small PSF, suggesting there may be selective pressure for plants to create neutral PSF. Broadly, testing PSFs in plant communities in field conditions provided a more realistic understanding of how PSFs affect plant growth in communities in the context of other species traits. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8427583/ /pubmed/34522331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7819 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Grenzer, Josephine
Kulmatiski, Andrew
Forero, Leslie
Ebeling, Anne
Eisenhauer, Nico
Norton, Jeanette
Moderate plant–soil feedbacks have small effects on the biodiversity–productivity relationship: A field experiment
title Moderate plant–soil feedbacks have small effects on the biodiversity–productivity relationship: A field experiment
title_full Moderate plant–soil feedbacks have small effects on the biodiversity–productivity relationship: A field experiment
title_fullStr Moderate plant–soil feedbacks have small effects on the biodiversity–productivity relationship: A field experiment
title_full_unstemmed Moderate plant–soil feedbacks have small effects on the biodiversity–productivity relationship: A field experiment
title_short Moderate plant–soil feedbacks have small effects on the biodiversity–productivity relationship: A field experiment
title_sort moderate plant–soil feedbacks have small effects on the biodiversity–productivity relationship: a field experiment
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7819
work_keys_str_mv AT grenzerjosephine moderateplantsoilfeedbackshavesmalleffectsonthebiodiversityproductivityrelationshipafieldexperiment
AT kulmatiskiandrew moderateplantsoilfeedbackshavesmalleffectsonthebiodiversityproductivityrelationshipafieldexperiment
AT foreroleslie moderateplantsoilfeedbackshavesmalleffectsonthebiodiversityproductivityrelationshipafieldexperiment
AT ebelinganne moderateplantsoilfeedbackshavesmalleffectsonthebiodiversityproductivityrelationshipafieldexperiment
AT eisenhauernico moderateplantsoilfeedbackshavesmalleffectsonthebiodiversityproductivityrelationshipafieldexperiment
AT nortonjeanette moderateplantsoilfeedbackshavesmalleffectsonthebiodiversityproductivityrelationshipafieldexperiment