Cargando…
Investigation of Different Free Image Analysis Software for High-Throughput Droplet Detection
[Image: see text] Droplet microfluidics has revealed innovative strategies in biology and chemistry. This advancement has delivered novel quantification methods, such as droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and an antibiotic heteroresistance analysis tool. For droplet analysis, research...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c02664 |
_version_ | 1783750216998977536 |
---|---|
author | Sanka, Immanuel Bartkova, Simona Pata, Pille Smolander, Olli-Pekka Scheler, Ott |
author_facet | Sanka, Immanuel Bartkova, Simona Pata, Pille Smolander, Olli-Pekka Scheler, Ott |
author_sort | Sanka, Immanuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Droplet microfluidics has revealed innovative strategies in biology and chemistry. This advancement has delivered novel quantification methods, such as droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and an antibiotic heteroresistance analysis tool. For droplet analysis, researchers often use image-based detection techniques. Unfortunately, the analysis of images may require specific tools or programming skills to produce the expected results. In order to address the issue, we explore the potential use of standalone freely available software to perform image-based droplet detection. We select the four most popular software and classify them into rule-based and machine learning-based types after assessing the software’s modules. We test and evaluate the software’s (i) ability to detect droplets, (ii) accuracy and precision, and (iii) overall components and supporting material. In our experimental setting, we find that the rule-based type of software is better suited for image-based droplet detection. The rule-based type of software also has a simpler workflow or pipeline, especially aimed for non-experienced users. In our case, CellProfiler (CP) offers the most user-friendly experience for both single image and batch processing analyses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8427638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84276382021-09-10 Investigation of Different Free Image Analysis Software for High-Throughput Droplet Detection Sanka, Immanuel Bartkova, Simona Pata, Pille Smolander, Olli-Pekka Scheler, Ott ACS Omega [Image: see text] Droplet microfluidics has revealed innovative strategies in biology and chemistry. This advancement has delivered novel quantification methods, such as droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and an antibiotic heteroresistance analysis tool. For droplet analysis, researchers often use image-based detection techniques. Unfortunately, the analysis of images may require specific tools or programming skills to produce the expected results. In order to address the issue, we explore the potential use of standalone freely available software to perform image-based droplet detection. We select the four most popular software and classify them into rule-based and machine learning-based types after assessing the software’s modules. We test and evaluate the software’s (i) ability to detect droplets, (ii) accuracy and precision, and (iii) overall components and supporting material. In our experimental setting, we find that the rule-based type of software is better suited for image-based droplet detection. The rule-based type of software also has a simpler workflow or pipeline, especially aimed for non-experienced users. In our case, CellProfiler (CP) offers the most user-friendly experience for both single image and batch processing analyses. American Chemical Society 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8427638/ /pubmed/34514234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c02664 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Sanka, Immanuel Bartkova, Simona Pata, Pille Smolander, Olli-Pekka Scheler, Ott Investigation of Different Free Image Analysis Software for High-Throughput Droplet Detection |
title | Investigation of Different Free Image Analysis Software
for High-Throughput Droplet Detection |
title_full | Investigation of Different Free Image Analysis Software
for High-Throughput Droplet Detection |
title_fullStr | Investigation of Different Free Image Analysis Software
for High-Throughput Droplet Detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigation of Different Free Image Analysis Software
for High-Throughput Droplet Detection |
title_short | Investigation of Different Free Image Analysis Software
for High-Throughput Droplet Detection |
title_sort | investigation of different free image analysis software
for high-throughput droplet detection |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c02664 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sankaimmanuel investigationofdifferentfreeimageanalysissoftwareforhighthroughputdropletdetection AT bartkovasimona investigationofdifferentfreeimageanalysissoftwareforhighthroughputdropletdetection AT patapille investigationofdifferentfreeimageanalysissoftwareforhighthroughputdropletdetection AT smolanderollipekka investigationofdifferentfreeimageanalysissoftwareforhighthroughputdropletdetection AT schelerott investigationofdifferentfreeimageanalysissoftwareforhighthroughputdropletdetection |