Cargando…
Structuring of plant communities across agricultural landscape mosaics: the importance of connectivity and the scale of effect
BACKGROUND: Plant communities of fragmented agricultural landscapes, are subject to patch isolation and scale-dependent effects. Variation in configuration, composition, and distance from one another affect biological processes of disturbance, productivity, and the movement ecology of species. Howev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34503449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01903-9 |
_version_ | 1783750267171241984 |
---|---|
author | McLeish, Michael Peláez, Adrián Pagán, Israel Gavilán, Rosario Fraile, Aurora García-Arenal, Fernando |
author_facet | McLeish, Michael Peláez, Adrián Pagán, Israel Gavilán, Rosario Fraile, Aurora García-Arenal, Fernando |
author_sort | McLeish, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Plant communities of fragmented agricultural landscapes, are subject to patch isolation and scale-dependent effects. Variation in configuration, composition, and distance from one another affect biological processes of disturbance, productivity, and the movement ecology of species. However, connectivity and spatial structuring among these diverse communities are rarely considered together in the investigation of biological processes. Spatially optimised predictor variables that are based on informed measures of connectivity among communities, offer a solution to untangling multiple processes that drive biodiversity. RESULTS: To address the gap between theory and practice, a novel spatial optimisation method that incorporates hypotheses of community connectivity, was used to estimate the scale of effect of biotic and abiotic factors that distinguish plant communities. We tested: (1) whether different hypotheses of connectivity among sites was important to measuring diversity and environmental variation among plant communities; and (2) whether spatially optimised variables of species relative abundance and the abiotic environment among communities were consistent with diversity parameters in distinguishing four habitat types; namely Crop, Edge, Oak, and Wasteland. The global estimates of spatial autocorrelation, which did not consider environmental variation among sites, indicated significant positive autocorrelation under four hypotheses of landscape connectivity. The spatially optimised approach indicated significant positive and negative autocorrelation of species relative abundance at fine and broad scales, which depended on the measure of connectivity and environmental variation among sites. CONCLUSIONS: These findings showed that variation in community diversity parameters does not necessarily correspond to underlying spatial structuring of species relative abundance. The technique used to generate spatially-optimised predictors is extendible to incorporate multiple variables of interest along with a priori hypotheses of landscape connectivity. Spatially-optimised variables with appropriate definitions of connectivity might be better than diversity parameters in explaining functional differences among communities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-021-01903-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8427894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84278942021-09-10 Structuring of plant communities across agricultural landscape mosaics: the importance of connectivity and the scale of effect McLeish, Michael Peláez, Adrián Pagán, Israel Gavilán, Rosario Fraile, Aurora García-Arenal, Fernando BMC Ecol Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Plant communities of fragmented agricultural landscapes, are subject to patch isolation and scale-dependent effects. Variation in configuration, composition, and distance from one another affect biological processes of disturbance, productivity, and the movement ecology of species. However, connectivity and spatial structuring among these diverse communities are rarely considered together in the investigation of biological processes. Spatially optimised predictor variables that are based on informed measures of connectivity among communities, offer a solution to untangling multiple processes that drive biodiversity. RESULTS: To address the gap between theory and practice, a novel spatial optimisation method that incorporates hypotheses of community connectivity, was used to estimate the scale of effect of biotic and abiotic factors that distinguish plant communities. We tested: (1) whether different hypotheses of connectivity among sites was important to measuring diversity and environmental variation among plant communities; and (2) whether spatially optimised variables of species relative abundance and the abiotic environment among communities were consistent with diversity parameters in distinguishing four habitat types; namely Crop, Edge, Oak, and Wasteland. The global estimates of spatial autocorrelation, which did not consider environmental variation among sites, indicated significant positive autocorrelation under four hypotheses of landscape connectivity. The spatially optimised approach indicated significant positive and negative autocorrelation of species relative abundance at fine and broad scales, which depended on the measure of connectivity and environmental variation among sites. CONCLUSIONS: These findings showed that variation in community diversity parameters does not necessarily correspond to underlying spatial structuring of species relative abundance. The technique used to generate spatially-optimised predictors is extendible to incorporate multiple variables of interest along with a priori hypotheses of landscape connectivity. Spatially-optimised variables with appropriate definitions of connectivity might be better than diversity parameters in explaining functional differences among communities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-021-01903-9. BioMed Central 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8427894/ /pubmed/34503449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01903-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McLeish, Michael Peláez, Adrián Pagán, Israel Gavilán, Rosario Fraile, Aurora García-Arenal, Fernando Structuring of plant communities across agricultural landscape mosaics: the importance of connectivity and the scale of effect |
title | Structuring of plant communities across agricultural landscape mosaics: the importance of connectivity and the scale of effect |
title_full | Structuring of plant communities across agricultural landscape mosaics: the importance of connectivity and the scale of effect |
title_fullStr | Structuring of plant communities across agricultural landscape mosaics: the importance of connectivity and the scale of effect |
title_full_unstemmed | Structuring of plant communities across agricultural landscape mosaics: the importance of connectivity and the scale of effect |
title_short | Structuring of plant communities across agricultural landscape mosaics: the importance of connectivity and the scale of effect |
title_sort | structuring of plant communities across agricultural landscape mosaics: the importance of connectivity and the scale of effect |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34503449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01903-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcleishmichael structuringofplantcommunitiesacrossagriculturallandscapemosaicstheimportanceofconnectivityandthescaleofeffect AT pelaezadrian structuringofplantcommunitiesacrossagriculturallandscapemosaicstheimportanceofconnectivityandthescaleofeffect AT paganisrael structuringofplantcommunitiesacrossagriculturallandscapemosaicstheimportanceofconnectivityandthescaleofeffect AT gavilanrosario structuringofplantcommunitiesacrossagriculturallandscapemosaicstheimportanceofconnectivityandthescaleofeffect AT fraileaurora structuringofplantcommunitiesacrossagriculturallandscapemosaicstheimportanceofconnectivityandthescaleofeffect AT garciaarenalfernando structuringofplantcommunitiesacrossagriculturallandscapemosaicstheimportanceofconnectivityandthescaleofeffect |