Cargando…

Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) has been established as an effective method for removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). The aim of the present study was to explore risk factors for technical difficulties in ESE. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we collected clinical data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jia, Tan, Yuyong, Liu, Deliang, Li, Chenjie, Le, Meixian, Zhou, Hejun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211029808
_version_ 1783750274640248832
author Liu, Jia
Tan, Yuyong
Liu, Deliang
Li, Chenjie
Le, Meixian
Zhou, Hejun
author_facet Liu, Jia
Tan, Yuyong
Liu, Deliang
Li, Chenjie
Le, Meixian
Zhou, Hejun
author_sort Liu, Jia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) has been established as an effective method for removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). The aim of the present study was to explore risk factors for technical difficulties in ESE. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we collected clinical data from patients who underwent ESE for gastric SMTs. Difficult ESE was defined as a procedure time ≥90 minutes, piecemeal resection, and/or occurrence of major adverse events. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the risk factors for a difficult ESE. RESULTS: ESE was successfully performed in 96.5% (195/202) of patients from April 2011 to December 2019. The average tumor size was 17.41 mm, and en bloc resection was achieved in 97.4% of patients (190/195). Five patients (2.56%, 5/195) had complications, including two with delayed bleeding, two with fever, and one with chest pain accompanying ST-T changes in an electrocardiogram. Twenty-four patients (11.88%, 24/202) had a difficult ESE. Logistic analysis showed that outgrowth behavior and an inexperienced surgeon were risk factors for a difficult ESE. CONCLUSION: ESE may be safe and effective to treat patients with gastric SMTs. Outgrowth behavior and an inexperienced surgeon were risk factors for a difficult ESE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8427932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84279322021-09-10 Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor Liu, Jia Tan, Yuyong Liu, Deliang Li, Chenjie Le, Meixian Zhou, Hejun J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) has been established as an effective method for removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). The aim of the present study was to explore risk factors for technical difficulties in ESE. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we collected clinical data from patients who underwent ESE for gastric SMTs. Difficult ESE was defined as a procedure time ≥90 minutes, piecemeal resection, and/or occurrence of major adverse events. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the risk factors for a difficult ESE. RESULTS: ESE was successfully performed in 96.5% (195/202) of patients from April 2011 to December 2019. The average tumor size was 17.41 mm, and en bloc resection was achieved in 97.4% of patients (190/195). Five patients (2.56%, 5/195) had complications, including two with delayed bleeding, two with fever, and one with chest pain accompanying ST-T changes in an electrocardiogram. Twenty-four patients (11.88%, 24/202) had a difficult ESE. Logistic analysis showed that outgrowth behavior and an inexperienced surgeon were risk factors for a difficult ESE. CONCLUSION: ESE may be safe and effective to treat patients with gastric SMTs. Outgrowth behavior and an inexperienced surgeon were risk factors for a difficult ESE. SAGE Publications 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8427932/ /pubmed/34488485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211029808 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Retrospective Clinical Research Report
Liu, Jia
Tan, Yuyong
Liu, Deliang
Li, Chenjie
Le, Meixian
Zhou, Hejun
Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor
title Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor
title_full Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor
title_fullStr Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor
title_full_unstemmed Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor
title_short Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor
title_sort factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor
topic Retrospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211029808
work_keys_str_mv AT liujia factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor
AT tanyuyong factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor
AT liudeliang factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor
AT lichenjie factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor
AT lemeixian factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor
AT zhouhejun factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor