Cargando…
Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor
OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) has been established as an effective method for removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). The aim of the present study was to explore risk factors for technical difficulties in ESE. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we collected clinical data...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211029808 |
_version_ | 1783750274640248832 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Jia Tan, Yuyong Liu, Deliang Li, Chenjie Le, Meixian Zhou, Hejun |
author_facet | Liu, Jia Tan, Yuyong Liu, Deliang Li, Chenjie Le, Meixian Zhou, Hejun |
author_sort | Liu, Jia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) has been established as an effective method for removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). The aim of the present study was to explore risk factors for technical difficulties in ESE. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we collected clinical data from patients who underwent ESE for gastric SMTs. Difficult ESE was defined as a procedure time ≥90 minutes, piecemeal resection, and/or occurrence of major adverse events. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the risk factors for a difficult ESE. RESULTS: ESE was successfully performed in 96.5% (195/202) of patients from April 2011 to December 2019. The average tumor size was 17.41 mm, and en bloc resection was achieved in 97.4% of patients (190/195). Five patients (2.56%, 5/195) had complications, including two with delayed bleeding, two with fever, and one with chest pain accompanying ST-T changes in an electrocardiogram. Twenty-four patients (11.88%, 24/202) had a difficult ESE. Logistic analysis showed that outgrowth behavior and an inexperienced surgeon were risk factors for a difficult ESE. CONCLUSION: ESE may be safe and effective to treat patients with gastric SMTs. Outgrowth behavior and an inexperienced surgeon were risk factors for a difficult ESE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8427932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84279322021-09-10 Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor Liu, Jia Tan, Yuyong Liu, Deliang Li, Chenjie Le, Meixian Zhou, Hejun J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) has been established as an effective method for removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). The aim of the present study was to explore risk factors for technical difficulties in ESE. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we collected clinical data from patients who underwent ESE for gastric SMTs. Difficult ESE was defined as a procedure time ≥90 minutes, piecemeal resection, and/or occurrence of major adverse events. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the risk factors for a difficult ESE. RESULTS: ESE was successfully performed in 96.5% (195/202) of patients from April 2011 to December 2019. The average tumor size was 17.41 mm, and en bloc resection was achieved in 97.4% of patients (190/195). Five patients (2.56%, 5/195) had complications, including two with delayed bleeding, two with fever, and one with chest pain accompanying ST-T changes in an electrocardiogram. Twenty-four patients (11.88%, 24/202) had a difficult ESE. Logistic analysis showed that outgrowth behavior and an inexperienced surgeon were risk factors for a difficult ESE. CONCLUSION: ESE may be safe and effective to treat patients with gastric SMTs. Outgrowth behavior and an inexperienced surgeon were risk factors for a difficult ESE. SAGE Publications 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8427932/ /pubmed/34488485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211029808 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Clinical Research Report Liu, Jia Tan, Yuyong Liu, Deliang Li, Chenjie Le, Meixian Zhou, Hejun Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor |
title | Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor |
title_full | Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor |
title_fullStr | Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor |
title_short | Factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor |
title_sort | factors predicting technical difficulties during endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumor |
topic | Retrospective Clinical Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211029808 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liujia factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor AT tanyuyong factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor AT liudeliang factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor AT lichenjie factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor AT lemeixian factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor AT zhouhejun factorspredictingtechnicaldifficultiesduringendoscopicsubmucosalexcavationforgastricsubmucosaltumor |