Cargando…
An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018
INTRODUCTION: Despite prioritization, routine antenatal influenza vaccine coverage is < 16% in South Africa. We aimed to describe maternal influenza vaccine coverage in 27 antenatal clinics (ANCs) in Gauteng and Western Cape (WC) Provinces, where in collaboration with the Department of Health (Do...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34503508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06962-8 |
_version_ | 1783750277710479360 |
---|---|
author | Bishop, Kate McMorrow, Meredith Meiring, Susan Walaza, Sibongile Rossi, Liza Mhlanga, Sarona Tempia, Stefano Mathunjwa, Azwifarwi Kleynhans, Jackie Appiah, Grace D. McAnerney, Johanna M. Zar, Heather J. Cohen, Cheryl |
author_facet | Bishop, Kate McMorrow, Meredith Meiring, Susan Walaza, Sibongile Rossi, Liza Mhlanga, Sarona Tempia, Stefano Mathunjwa, Azwifarwi Kleynhans, Jackie Appiah, Grace D. McAnerney, Johanna M. Zar, Heather J. Cohen, Cheryl |
author_sort | Bishop, Kate |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite prioritization, routine antenatal influenza vaccine coverage is < 16% in South Africa. We aimed to describe maternal influenza vaccine coverage in 27 antenatal clinics (ANCs) in Gauteng and Western Cape (WC) Provinces, where in collaboration with the Department of Health (DoH), we augmented the annual influenza vaccination programme among pregnant women. METHODS: From 2015 through 2018, 40,230 additional doses of influenza vaccine were added to the available stock and administered as part of routine antenatal care. Educational talks were given daily and data were collected on women attending ANCs. We compared characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated women using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We screened 62,979 pregnant women during the period when Southern Hemisphere influenza vaccines were available (27,068 in Gauteng and 35,911 in WC). Vaccine coverage at the targeted clinics was 78.7% (49,355/62682), although pregnant women in WC were more likely to be vaccinated compared to those in the Gauteng (Odds ratio (OR) =3.7 p < 0.001). Women aged 25—29 and > 35 years were less likely to be vaccinated than women aged 18—24 years (OR = 0.9 p = 0.053; OR = 0.9 p < 0.001). HIV positive status was not associated with vaccination (OR = 1.0 p = 0.266). Reasons for not vaccinating included: vaccine stock-outs where ANCs depleted available stock of vaccines and/or were awaiting delivery of vaccines (54.6%, 6949/12723), refusal/indecision (25.8%, 3285), and current illness that contraindicated vaccination (19.6%, 2489). CONCLUSION: Antenatal vaccination uptake was likely improved by the increased vaccine supply and vaccine education offered during our campaign. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8427945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84279452021-09-10 An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 Bishop, Kate McMorrow, Meredith Meiring, Susan Walaza, Sibongile Rossi, Liza Mhlanga, Sarona Tempia, Stefano Mathunjwa, Azwifarwi Kleynhans, Jackie Appiah, Grace D. McAnerney, Johanna M. Zar, Heather J. Cohen, Cheryl BMC Health Serv Res Research INTRODUCTION: Despite prioritization, routine antenatal influenza vaccine coverage is < 16% in South Africa. We aimed to describe maternal influenza vaccine coverage in 27 antenatal clinics (ANCs) in Gauteng and Western Cape (WC) Provinces, where in collaboration with the Department of Health (DoH), we augmented the annual influenza vaccination programme among pregnant women. METHODS: From 2015 through 2018, 40,230 additional doses of influenza vaccine were added to the available stock and administered as part of routine antenatal care. Educational talks were given daily and data were collected on women attending ANCs. We compared characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated women using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We screened 62,979 pregnant women during the period when Southern Hemisphere influenza vaccines were available (27,068 in Gauteng and 35,911 in WC). Vaccine coverage at the targeted clinics was 78.7% (49,355/62682), although pregnant women in WC were more likely to be vaccinated compared to those in the Gauteng (Odds ratio (OR) =3.7 p < 0.001). Women aged 25—29 and > 35 years were less likely to be vaccinated than women aged 18—24 years (OR = 0.9 p = 0.053; OR = 0.9 p < 0.001). HIV positive status was not associated with vaccination (OR = 1.0 p = 0.266). Reasons for not vaccinating included: vaccine stock-outs where ANCs depleted available stock of vaccines and/or were awaiting delivery of vaccines (54.6%, 6949/12723), refusal/indecision (25.8%, 3285), and current illness that contraindicated vaccination (19.6%, 2489). CONCLUSION: Antenatal vaccination uptake was likely improved by the increased vaccine supply and vaccine education offered during our campaign. BioMed Central 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8427945/ /pubmed/34503508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06962-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bishop, Kate McMorrow, Meredith Meiring, Susan Walaza, Sibongile Rossi, Liza Mhlanga, Sarona Tempia, Stefano Mathunjwa, Azwifarwi Kleynhans, Jackie Appiah, Grace D. McAnerney, Johanna M. Zar, Heather J. Cohen, Cheryl An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 |
title | An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 |
title_full | An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 |
title_short | An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 |
title_sort | evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of south africa, 2015 – 2018 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34503508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06962-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bishopkate anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT mcmorrowmeredith anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT meiringsusan anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT walazasibongile anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT rossiliza anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT mhlangasarona anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT tempiastefano anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT mathunjwaazwifarwi anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT kleynhansjackie anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT appiahgraced anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT mcanerneyjohannam anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT zarheatherj anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT cohencheryl anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT bishopkate evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT mcmorrowmeredith evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT meiringsusan evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT walazasibongile evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT rossiliza evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT mhlangasarona evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT tempiastefano evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT mathunjwaazwifarwi evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT kleynhansjackie evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT appiahgraced evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT mcanerneyjohannam evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT zarheatherj evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT cohencheryl evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 |