Cargando…

An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018

INTRODUCTION: Despite prioritization, routine antenatal influenza vaccine coverage is < 16% in South Africa. We aimed to describe maternal influenza vaccine coverage in 27 antenatal clinics (ANCs) in Gauteng and Western Cape (WC) Provinces, where in collaboration with the Department of Health (Do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bishop, Kate, McMorrow, Meredith, Meiring, Susan, Walaza, Sibongile, Rossi, Liza, Mhlanga, Sarona, Tempia, Stefano, Mathunjwa, Azwifarwi, Kleynhans, Jackie, Appiah, Grace D., McAnerney, Johanna M., Zar, Heather J., Cohen, Cheryl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34503508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06962-8
_version_ 1783750277710479360
author Bishop, Kate
McMorrow, Meredith
Meiring, Susan
Walaza, Sibongile
Rossi, Liza
Mhlanga, Sarona
Tempia, Stefano
Mathunjwa, Azwifarwi
Kleynhans, Jackie
Appiah, Grace D.
McAnerney, Johanna M.
Zar, Heather J.
Cohen, Cheryl
author_facet Bishop, Kate
McMorrow, Meredith
Meiring, Susan
Walaza, Sibongile
Rossi, Liza
Mhlanga, Sarona
Tempia, Stefano
Mathunjwa, Azwifarwi
Kleynhans, Jackie
Appiah, Grace D.
McAnerney, Johanna M.
Zar, Heather J.
Cohen, Cheryl
author_sort Bishop, Kate
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite prioritization, routine antenatal influenza vaccine coverage is < 16% in South Africa. We aimed to describe maternal influenza vaccine coverage in 27 antenatal clinics (ANCs) in Gauteng and Western Cape (WC) Provinces, where in collaboration with the Department of Health (DoH), we augmented the annual influenza vaccination programme among pregnant women. METHODS: From 2015 through 2018, 40,230 additional doses of influenza vaccine were added to the available stock and administered as part of routine antenatal care. Educational talks were given daily and data were collected on women attending ANCs. We compared characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated women using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We screened 62,979 pregnant women during the period when Southern Hemisphere influenza vaccines were available (27,068 in Gauteng and 35,911 in WC). Vaccine coverage at the targeted clinics was 78.7% (49,355/62682), although pregnant women in WC were more likely to be vaccinated compared to those in the Gauteng (Odds ratio (OR) =3.7 p < 0.001). Women aged 25—29 and > 35 years were less likely to be vaccinated than women aged 18—24 years (OR = 0.9 p = 0.053; OR = 0.9 p < 0.001). HIV positive status was not associated with vaccination (OR = 1.0 p = 0.266). Reasons for not vaccinating included: vaccine stock-outs where ANCs depleted available stock of vaccines and/or were awaiting delivery of vaccines (54.6%, 6949/12723), refusal/indecision (25.8%, 3285), and current illness that contraindicated vaccination (19.6%, 2489). CONCLUSION: Antenatal vaccination uptake was likely improved by the increased vaccine supply and vaccine education offered during our campaign.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8427945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84279452021-09-10 An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 Bishop, Kate McMorrow, Meredith Meiring, Susan Walaza, Sibongile Rossi, Liza Mhlanga, Sarona Tempia, Stefano Mathunjwa, Azwifarwi Kleynhans, Jackie Appiah, Grace D. McAnerney, Johanna M. Zar, Heather J. Cohen, Cheryl BMC Health Serv Res Research INTRODUCTION: Despite prioritization, routine antenatal influenza vaccine coverage is < 16% in South Africa. We aimed to describe maternal influenza vaccine coverage in 27 antenatal clinics (ANCs) in Gauteng and Western Cape (WC) Provinces, where in collaboration with the Department of Health (DoH), we augmented the annual influenza vaccination programme among pregnant women. METHODS: From 2015 through 2018, 40,230 additional doses of influenza vaccine were added to the available stock and administered as part of routine antenatal care. Educational talks were given daily and data were collected on women attending ANCs. We compared characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated women using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We screened 62,979 pregnant women during the period when Southern Hemisphere influenza vaccines were available (27,068 in Gauteng and 35,911 in WC). Vaccine coverage at the targeted clinics was 78.7% (49,355/62682), although pregnant women in WC were more likely to be vaccinated compared to those in the Gauteng (Odds ratio (OR) =3.7 p < 0.001). Women aged 25—29 and > 35 years were less likely to be vaccinated than women aged 18—24 years (OR = 0.9 p = 0.053; OR = 0.9 p < 0.001). HIV positive status was not associated with vaccination (OR = 1.0 p = 0.266). Reasons for not vaccinating included: vaccine stock-outs where ANCs depleted available stock of vaccines and/or were awaiting delivery of vaccines (54.6%, 6949/12723), refusal/indecision (25.8%, 3285), and current illness that contraindicated vaccination (19.6%, 2489). CONCLUSION: Antenatal vaccination uptake was likely improved by the increased vaccine supply and vaccine education offered during our campaign. BioMed Central 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8427945/ /pubmed/34503508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06962-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bishop, Kate
McMorrow, Meredith
Meiring, Susan
Walaza, Sibongile
Rossi, Liza
Mhlanga, Sarona
Tempia, Stefano
Mathunjwa, Azwifarwi
Kleynhans, Jackie
Appiah, Grace D.
McAnerney, Johanna M.
Zar, Heather J.
Cohen, Cheryl
An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018
title An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018
title_full An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018
title_fullStr An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018
title_short An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018
title_sort evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of south africa, 2015 – 2018
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34503508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06962-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bishopkate anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT mcmorrowmeredith anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT meiringsusan anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT walazasibongile anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT rossiliza anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT mhlangasarona anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT tempiastefano anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT mathunjwaazwifarwi anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT kleynhansjackie anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT appiahgraced anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT mcanerneyjohannam anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT zarheatherj anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT cohencheryl anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT bishopkate evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT mcmorrowmeredith evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT meiringsusan evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT walazasibongile evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT rossiliza evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT mhlangasarona evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT tempiastefano evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT mathunjwaazwifarwi evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT kleynhansjackie evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT appiahgraced evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT mcanerneyjohannam evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT zarheatherj evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018
AT cohencheryl evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018