Cargando…
The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study
BACKGROUND: Continuous infusion of propofol has been used to achieve sedation in children. However, the relationship between the effect-site concentration (C(e)) of propofol and sedation scale has not been previously examined. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34503455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01446-y |
_version_ | 1783750279639859200 |
---|---|
author | Jang, Young-Eun Ji, Sang-Hwan Lee, Ji-Hyun Kim, Eun-Hee Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Hee-Soo |
author_facet | Jang, Young-Eun Ji, Sang-Hwan Lee, Ji-Hyun Kim, Eun-Hee Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Hee-Soo |
author_sort | Jang, Young-Eun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Continuous infusion of propofol has been used to achieve sedation in children. However, the relationship between the effect-site concentration (C(e)) of propofol and sedation scale has not been previously examined. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the C(e) of propofol and the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) score in children with population pharmacodynamic modeling. METHODS: A total of 30 patients (aged 3 to 6 years) who underwent surgery under general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil lasting more than 1 h were enrolled in this study. Sedation levels were evaluated using the UMSS score every 20 s by a 1 μg/mL stepwise increase in the C(e) of propofol during the induction of anesthesia. The pharmacodynamic relationship between the C(e) of propofol and UMSS score was analyzed by logistic regression with nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. RESULTS: The estimated C(e50) (95% confidence interval) of propofol to yield UMSS scores equal to or greater than n were 1.84 (1.54–2.14), 2.64 (2.20–3.08), 3.98 (3.66–4.30), and 4.78 (4.53–5.03) μg/mL for n = 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The slope steepness for the relationship of the C(e) versus sedative response to propofol (95% confidence interval) was 5.76 (4.00–7.52). CONCLUSIONS: We quantified the pharmacodynamic relationship between the C(e) of propofol and UMSS score, and this finding may be helpful to predict the sedation score at the target C(e) of propofol in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (No.: NCT03195686, Date of registration: 22/06/2017). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8427954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84279542021-09-10 The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study Jang, Young-Eun Ji, Sang-Hwan Lee, Ji-Hyun Kim, Eun-Hee Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Hee-Soo BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Continuous infusion of propofol has been used to achieve sedation in children. However, the relationship between the effect-site concentration (C(e)) of propofol and sedation scale has not been previously examined. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the C(e) of propofol and the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) score in children with population pharmacodynamic modeling. METHODS: A total of 30 patients (aged 3 to 6 years) who underwent surgery under general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil lasting more than 1 h were enrolled in this study. Sedation levels were evaluated using the UMSS score every 20 s by a 1 μg/mL stepwise increase in the C(e) of propofol during the induction of anesthesia. The pharmacodynamic relationship between the C(e) of propofol and UMSS score was analyzed by logistic regression with nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. RESULTS: The estimated C(e50) (95% confidence interval) of propofol to yield UMSS scores equal to or greater than n were 1.84 (1.54–2.14), 2.64 (2.20–3.08), 3.98 (3.66–4.30), and 4.78 (4.53–5.03) μg/mL for n = 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The slope steepness for the relationship of the C(e) versus sedative response to propofol (95% confidence interval) was 5.76 (4.00–7.52). CONCLUSIONS: We quantified the pharmacodynamic relationship between the C(e) of propofol and UMSS score, and this finding may be helpful to predict the sedation score at the target C(e) of propofol in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (No.: NCT03195686, Date of registration: 22/06/2017). BioMed Central 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8427954/ /pubmed/34503455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01446-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Jang, Young-Eun Ji, Sang-Hwan Lee, Ji-Hyun Kim, Eun-Hee Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Hee-Soo The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study |
title | The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study |
title_full | The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study |
title_fullStr | The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study |
title_full_unstemmed | The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study |
title_short | The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study |
title_sort | relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34503455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01446-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jangyoungeun therelationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy AT jisanghwan therelationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy AT leejihyun therelationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy AT kimeunhee therelationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy AT kimjintae therelationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy AT kimheesoo therelationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy AT jangyoungeun relationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy AT jisanghwan relationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy AT leejihyun relationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy AT kimeunhee relationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy AT kimjintae relationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy AT kimheesoo relationshipbetweentheeffectsiteconcentrationofpropofolandsedationscaleinchildrenapharmacodynamicmodelingstudy |