Cargando…

Comparison of uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulation with vitamin‐K antagonists during AF‐ablation in the clinical routine. A single center register

BACKGROUND: Uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) in AF‐ablation is recommended, proven by randomized trials. The outcome and the periinterventional differences between DOACs and VKA in the real world clinical practice are discussed controversial. HYPOTHESIS: To investigate efficiency and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christoph, Marian, Youssef, Akram, Svitil, Jan, Forkmann, Mathias, Huo, Yan, Gaspar, Thomas, Francke, Alexander, Schoen, Steffen, Quick, Silvio, Wunderlich, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34312888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23676
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) in AF‐ablation is recommended, proven by randomized trials. The outcome and the periinterventional differences between DOACs and VKA in the real world clinical practice are discussed controversial. HYPOTHESIS: To investigate efficiency and safety of uninterrupted DOAC therapy compared to VKA during AF‐Ablation in real world setting with a focus on periinterventional heparin dosage.