Cargando…

Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE) provides better outcomes than open techniques, particularly in terms of post-operative recovery and pulmonary complications. However, in addition to requiring advanced technical skills, thoracoscopic access makes it hard to perform esop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peri, A., Furbetta, N., Viganò, J., Pugliese, L., Di Franco, G., Latteri, F. S., Mineo, N., Bruno, F. C., Gallo, V., Morelli, L., Pietrabissa, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34499220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08715-4
_version_ 1783750333888987136
author Peri, A.
Furbetta, N.
Viganò, J.
Pugliese, L.
Di Franco, G.
Latteri, F. S.
Mineo, N.
Bruno, F. C.
Gallo, V.
Morelli, L.
Pietrabissa, A.
author_facet Peri, A.
Furbetta, N.
Viganò, J.
Pugliese, L.
Di Franco, G.
Latteri, F. S.
Mineo, N.
Bruno, F. C.
Gallo, V.
Morelli, L.
Pietrabissa, A.
author_sort Peri, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE) provides better outcomes than open techniques, particularly in terms of post-operative recovery and pulmonary complications. However, in addition to requiring advanced technical skills, thoracoscopic access makes it hard to perform esophagogastric anastomosis safely, and the reported rates of anastomotic leak vary from 5 to 16%. Several minimally invasive esophago-gastric anastomotic techniques have been described, but to date strong evidence to support one technique over the others is still lacking. We herein report the technical details and preliminary results of a new robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis technique. METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2020, 12 cases of laparoscopic/thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis were performed. The gastric conduit was prepared and tailored taking care of vascularization with a complete resection of the gastric fundus. The anastomosis consisted of a robot-assisted, hand-sewn four layers of absorbable monofilament running barbed suture (V-lock). The posterior outer layer incorporated the gastric and esophageal staple lines. RESULTS: The post-operative course was uneventful in nine cases. Two patients developed chyloperitoneum, one patient a Sars-Cov-2 infection, and one patient a late anastomotic stricture. In all cases, there were no anastomotic leaks or delayed gastric conduit emptying. The median post-operative stay was 13 days (min 7, max 37 days); the longest in-hospital stay was recorded in patients who developed chyloperitoneum. CONCLUSION: Despite the small series, we believe that our technique looks to be promising, safe, and reproducible. Some key points may be useful to guarantee a low complications rate after MIILE, particularly regarding anastomotic leaks and delayed emptying: the resection of the gastric fundus, the use of robot assistance, the incorporation of the staple lines in the posterior aspect of the anastomosis, and the use of barbed suture. Further cases are needed to validate the preliminary, but very encouraging, results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08715-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8428217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84282172021-09-10 Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy Peri, A. Furbetta, N. Viganò, J. Pugliese, L. Di Franco, G. Latteri, F. S. Mineo, N. Bruno, F. C. Gallo, V. Morelli, L. Pietrabissa, A. Surg Endosc Dynamic Manuscript BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE) provides better outcomes than open techniques, particularly in terms of post-operative recovery and pulmonary complications. However, in addition to requiring advanced technical skills, thoracoscopic access makes it hard to perform esophagogastric anastomosis safely, and the reported rates of anastomotic leak vary from 5 to 16%. Several minimally invasive esophago-gastric anastomotic techniques have been described, but to date strong evidence to support one technique over the others is still lacking. We herein report the technical details and preliminary results of a new robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis technique. METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2020, 12 cases of laparoscopic/thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis were performed. The gastric conduit was prepared and tailored taking care of vascularization with a complete resection of the gastric fundus. The anastomosis consisted of a robot-assisted, hand-sewn four layers of absorbable monofilament running barbed suture (V-lock). The posterior outer layer incorporated the gastric and esophageal staple lines. RESULTS: The post-operative course was uneventful in nine cases. Two patients developed chyloperitoneum, one patient a Sars-Cov-2 infection, and one patient a late anastomotic stricture. In all cases, there were no anastomotic leaks or delayed gastric conduit emptying. The median post-operative stay was 13 days (min 7, max 37 days); the longest in-hospital stay was recorded in patients who developed chyloperitoneum. CONCLUSION: Despite the small series, we believe that our technique looks to be promising, safe, and reproducible. Some key points may be useful to guarantee a low complications rate after MIILE, particularly regarding anastomotic leaks and delayed emptying: the resection of the gastric fundus, the use of robot assistance, the incorporation of the staple lines in the posterior aspect of the anastomosis, and the use of barbed suture. Further cases are needed to validate the preliminary, but very encouraging, results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08715-4. Springer US 2021-09-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8428217/ /pubmed/34499220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08715-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Dynamic Manuscript
Peri, A.
Furbetta, N.
Viganò, J.
Pugliese, L.
Di Franco, G.
Latteri, F. S.
Mineo, N.
Bruno, F. C.
Gallo, V.
Morelli, L.
Pietrabissa, A.
Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
title Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
title_full Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
title_fullStr Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
title_full_unstemmed Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
title_short Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
title_sort technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive ivor lewis esophagectomy
topic Dynamic Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34499220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08715-4
work_keys_str_mv AT peria technicaldetailsforarobotassistedhandsewnesophagogastricanastomosisduringminimallyinvasiveivorlewisesophagectomy
AT furbettan technicaldetailsforarobotassistedhandsewnesophagogastricanastomosisduringminimallyinvasiveivorlewisesophagectomy
AT viganoj technicaldetailsforarobotassistedhandsewnesophagogastricanastomosisduringminimallyinvasiveivorlewisesophagectomy
AT pugliesel technicaldetailsforarobotassistedhandsewnesophagogastricanastomosisduringminimallyinvasiveivorlewisesophagectomy
AT difrancog technicaldetailsforarobotassistedhandsewnesophagogastricanastomosisduringminimallyinvasiveivorlewisesophagectomy
AT latterifs technicaldetailsforarobotassistedhandsewnesophagogastricanastomosisduringminimallyinvasiveivorlewisesophagectomy
AT mineon technicaldetailsforarobotassistedhandsewnesophagogastricanastomosisduringminimallyinvasiveivorlewisesophagectomy
AT brunofc technicaldetailsforarobotassistedhandsewnesophagogastricanastomosisduringminimallyinvasiveivorlewisesophagectomy
AT gallov technicaldetailsforarobotassistedhandsewnesophagogastricanastomosisduringminimallyinvasiveivorlewisesophagectomy
AT morellil technicaldetailsforarobotassistedhandsewnesophagogastricanastomosisduringminimallyinvasiveivorlewisesophagectomy
AT pietrabissaa technicaldetailsforarobotassistedhandsewnesophagogastricanastomosisduringminimallyinvasiveivorlewisesophagectomy