Cargando…
Review on Comparison of Different Energy Storage Technologies Used in Micro-Energy Harvesting, WSNs, Low-Cost Microelectronic Devices: Challenges and Recommendations
This paper reviews energy storage systems, in general, and for specific applications in low-cost micro-energy harvesting (MEH) systems, low-cost microelectronic devices, and wireless sensor networks (WSNs). With the development of electronic gadgets, low-cost microelectronic devices and WSNs, the ne...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155041 |
_version_ | 1783750338998697984 |
---|---|
author | Riaz, Amna Sarker, Mahidur R. Saad, Mohamad Hanif Md Mohamed, Ramizi |
author_facet | Riaz, Amna Sarker, Mahidur R. Saad, Mohamad Hanif Md Mohamed, Ramizi |
author_sort | Riaz, Amna |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper reviews energy storage systems, in general, and for specific applications in low-cost micro-energy harvesting (MEH) systems, low-cost microelectronic devices, and wireless sensor networks (WSNs). With the development of electronic gadgets, low-cost microelectronic devices and WSNs, the need for an efficient, light and reliable energy storage device is increased. The current energy storage systems (ESS) have the disadvantages of self-discharging, energy density, life cycles, and cost. The ambient energy resources are the best option as an energy source, but the main challenge in harvesting energy from ambient sources is the instability of the source of energy. Due to the explosion of lithium batteries in many cases, and the pros associated with them, the design of an efficient device, which is more reliable and efficient than conventional batteries, is important. This review paper focused on the issues of the reliability and performance of electrical ESS, and, especially, discussed the technical challenges and suggested solutions for ESS (batteries, supercapacitors, and for a hybrid combination of supercapacitors and batteries) in detail. Nowadays, the main market of batteries is WSNs, but in the last decade, the world’s attention has turned toward supercapacitors as a good alternative of batteries. The main advantages of supercapacitors are their light weight, volume, greater life cycle, turbo charging/discharging, high energy density and power density, low cost, easy maintenance, and no pollution. This study reviews supercapacitors as a better alternative of batteries in low-cost electronic devices, WSNs, and MEH systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8428241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84282412021-09-10 Review on Comparison of Different Energy Storage Technologies Used in Micro-Energy Harvesting, WSNs, Low-Cost Microelectronic Devices: Challenges and Recommendations Riaz, Amna Sarker, Mahidur R. Saad, Mohamad Hanif Md Mohamed, Ramizi Sensors (Basel) Review This paper reviews energy storage systems, in general, and for specific applications in low-cost micro-energy harvesting (MEH) systems, low-cost microelectronic devices, and wireless sensor networks (WSNs). With the development of electronic gadgets, low-cost microelectronic devices and WSNs, the need for an efficient, light and reliable energy storage device is increased. The current energy storage systems (ESS) have the disadvantages of self-discharging, energy density, life cycles, and cost. The ambient energy resources are the best option as an energy source, but the main challenge in harvesting energy from ambient sources is the instability of the source of energy. Due to the explosion of lithium batteries in many cases, and the pros associated with them, the design of an efficient device, which is more reliable and efficient than conventional batteries, is important. This review paper focused on the issues of the reliability and performance of electrical ESS, and, especially, discussed the technical challenges and suggested solutions for ESS (batteries, supercapacitors, and for a hybrid combination of supercapacitors and batteries) in detail. Nowadays, the main market of batteries is WSNs, but in the last decade, the world’s attention has turned toward supercapacitors as a good alternative of batteries. The main advantages of supercapacitors are their light weight, volume, greater life cycle, turbo charging/discharging, high energy density and power density, low cost, easy maintenance, and no pollution. This study reviews supercapacitors as a better alternative of batteries in low-cost electronic devices, WSNs, and MEH systems. MDPI 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8428241/ /pubmed/34372278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155041 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Riaz, Amna Sarker, Mahidur R. Saad, Mohamad Hanif Md Mohamed, Ramizi Review on Comparison of Different Energy Storage Technologies Used in Micro-Energy Harvesting, WSNs, Low-Cost Microelectronic Devices: Challenges and Recommendations |
title | Review on Comparison of Different Energy Storage Technologies Used in Micro-Energy Harvesting, WSNs, Low-Cost Microelectronic Devices: Challenges and Recommendations |
title_full | Review on Comparison of Different Energy Storage Technologies Used in Micro-Energy Harvesting, WSNs, Low-Cost Microelectronic Devices: Challenges and Recommendations |
title_fullStr | Review on Comparison of Different Energy Storage Technologies Used in Micro-Energy Harvesting, WSNs, Low-Cost Microelectronic Devices: Challenges and Recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Review on Comparison of Different Energy Storage Technologies Used in Micro-Energy Harvesting, WSNs, Low-Cost Microelectronic Devices: Challenges and Recommendations |
title_short | Review on Comparison of Different Energy Storage Technologies Used in Micro-Energy Harvesting, WSNs, Low-Cost Microelectronic Devices: Challenges and Recommendations |
title_sort | review on comparison of different energy storage technologies used in micro-energy harvesting, wsns, low-cost microelectronic devices: challenges and recommendations |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155041 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riazamna reviewoncomparisonofdifferentenergystoragetechnologiesusedinmicroenergyharvestingwsnslowcostmicroelectronicdeviceschallengesandrecommendations AT sarkermahidurr reviewoncomparisonofdifferentenergystoragetechnologiesusedinmicroenergyharvestingwsnslowcostmicroelectronicdeviceschallengesandrecommendations AT saadmohamadhanifmd reviewoncomparisonofdifferentenergystoragetechnologiesusedinmicroenergyharvestingwsnslowcostmicroelectronicdeviceschallengesandrecommendations AT mohamedramizi reviewoncomparisonofdifferentenergystoragetechnologiesusedinmicroenergyharvestingwsnslowcostmicroelectronicdeviceschallengesandrecommendations |