Cargando…

Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi

Background and purpose — In Malawi, both skeletal traction (ST) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are used in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, ST being the mainstay treatment. Previous studies have found that IMN has improved outcomes and is less expensive than ST. However, no cost-effective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chokotho, Linda, Donnelley, Claire A, Young, Sven, Lau, Brian C, Wu, Hao-Hua, Mkandawire, Nyengo, Gjertsen, Jan-Erik, Hallan, Geir, Agarwal-Harding, Kiran J, Shearer, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33757393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1897927
_version_ 1783750344839266304
author Chokotho, Linda
Donnelley, Claire A
Young, Sven
Lau, Brian C
Wu, Hao-Hua
Mkandawire, Nyengo
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Hallan, Geir
Agarwal-Harding, Kiran J
Shearer, David
author_facet Chokotho, Linda
Donnelley, Claire A
Young, Sven
Lau, Brian C
Wu, Hao-Hua
Mkandawire, Nyengo
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Hallan, Geir
Agarwal-Harding, Kiran J
Shearer, David
author_sort Chokotho, Linda
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose — In Malawi, both skeletal traction (ST) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are used in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, ST being the mainstay treatment. Previous studies have found that IMN has improved outcomes and is less expensive than ST. However, no cost-effectiveness analyses have yet compared IMN and ST in Malawi. We report the results of a cost-utility analysis (CUA) comparing treatment using either IMN or ST. Patients and methods — This was an economic evaluation study, where a CUA was done using a decision-tree model from the government healthcare payer and societal perspectives with an 1-year time horizon. We obtained EQ-5D-3L utility scores and probabilities from a prospective observational study assessing quality of life and function in 187 adult patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with either IMN or ST. The patients were followed up at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated from utility scores using the area under the curve method. Direct treatment costs were obtained from a prospective micro costing study. Indirect costs included patient lost productivity, patient transportation, meals, and childcare costs associated with hospital stay and follow-up visits. Multiple sensitivity analyses assessed model uncertainty. Results — Total treatment costs were higher for ST ($1,349) compared with IMN ($1,122). QALYs were lower for ST than IMN, 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.76) and 0.77 (CI 0.71–0.82) respectively. Based on lower cost and higher utility, IMN was the dominant strategy. IMN remained dominant in 94% of simulations. IMN would be less cost-effective than ST at a total procedure cost exceeding $880 from the payer’s perspective, or $1,035 from the societal perspective. Interpretation — IMN was cost saving and more effective than ST in the treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures in Malawi, and may be an efficient use of limited healthcare resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8428269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84282692021-09-10 Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi Chokotho, Linda Donnelley, Claire A Young, Sven Lau, Brian C Wu, Hao-Hua Mkandawire, Nyengo Gjertsen, Jan-Erik Hallan, Geir Agarwal-Harding, Kiran J Shearer, David Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose — In Malawi, both skeletal traction (ST) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are used in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, ST being the mainstay treatment. Previous studies have found that IMN has improved outcomes and is less expensive than ST. However, no cost-effectiveness analyses have yet compared IMN and ST in Malawi. We report the results of a cost-utility analysis (CUA) comparing treatment using either IMN or ST. Patients and methods — This was an economic evaluation study, where a CUA was done using a decision-tree model from the government healthcare payer and societal perspectives with an 1-year time horizon. We obtained EQ-5D-3L utility scores and probabilities from a prospective observational study assessing quality of life and function in 187 adult patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with either IMN or ST. The patients were followed up at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated from utility scores using the area under the curve method. Direct treatment costs were obtained from a prospective micro costing study. Indirect costs included patient lost productivity, patient transportation, meals, and childcare costs associated with hospital stay and follow-up visits. Multiple sensitivity analyses assessed model uncertainty. Results — Total treatment costs were higher for ST ($1,349) compared with IMN ($1,122). QALYs were lower for ST than IMN, 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.76) and 0.77 (CI 0.71–0.82) respectively. Based on lower cost and higher utility, IMN was the dominant strategy. IMN remained dominant in 94% of simulations. IMN would be less cost-effective than ST at a total procedure cost exceeding $880 from the payer’s perspective, or $1,035 from the societal perspective. Interpretation — IMN was cost saving and more effective than ST in the treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures in Malawi, and may be an efficient use of limited healthcare resources. Taylor & Francis 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8428269/ /pubmed/33757393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1897927 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chokotho, Linda
Donnelley, Claire A
Young, Sven
Lau, Brian C
Wu, Hao-Hua
Mkandawire, Nyengo
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Hallan, Geir
Agarwal-Harding, Kiran J
Shearer, David
Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi
title Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi
title_full Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi
title_fullStr Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi
title_short Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi
title_sort cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in malawi
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33757393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1897927
work_keys_str_mv AT chokotholinda costutilityanalysisofintramedullarynailingandskeletaltractiontreatmentforpatientswithfemoralshaftfracturesinmalawi
AT donnelleyclairea costutilityanalysisofintramedullarynailingandskeletaltractiontreatmentforpatientswithfemoralshaftfracturesinmalawi
AT youngsven costutilityanalysisofintramedullarynailingandskeletaltractiontreatmentforpatientswithfemoralshaftfracturesinmalawi
AT laubrianc costutilityanalysisofintramedullarynailingandskeletaltractiontreatmentforpatientswithfemoralshaftfracturesinmalawi
AT wuhaohua costutilityanalysisofintramedullarynailingandskeletaltractiontreatmentforpatientswithfemoralshaftfracturesinmalawi
AT mkandawirenyengo costutilityanalysisofintramedullarynailingandskeletaltractiontreatmentforpatientswithfemoralshaftfracturesinmalawi
AT gjertsenjanerik costutilityanalysisofintramedullarynailingandskeletaltractiontreatmentforpatientswithfemoralshaftfracturesinmalawi
AT hallangeir costutilityanalysisofintramedullarynailingandskeletaltractiontreatmentforpatientswithfemoralshaftfracturesinmalawi
AT agarwalhardingkiranj costutilityanalysisofintramedullarynailingandskeletaltractiontreatmentforpatientswithfemoralshaftfracturesinmalawi
AT shearerdavid costutilityanalysisofintramedullarynailingandskeletaltractiontreatmentforpatientswithfemoralshaftfracturesinmalawi